A Comparative Analysis of Cicero and Aquinas

Nature and the Natural Law

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Natural Law, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy, Ancient, Ethics & Moral Philosophy
Cover of the book A Comparative Analysis of Cicero and Aquinas by Charles P. Nemeth, Bloomsbury Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Charles P. Nemeth ISBN: 9781350009479
Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing Publication: May 18, 2017
Imprint: Bloomsbury Academic Language: English
Author: Charles P. Nemeth
ISBN: 9781350009479
Publisher: Bloomsbury Publishing
Publication: May 18, 2017
Imprint: Bloomsbury Academic
Language: English

In A Comparative Analysis of Cicero and Aquinas, Charles P. Nemeth investigates how, despite their differences, these two figures may be the most compatible brothers in ideas ever conceived in the theory of natural law. Looking to find common threads that run between the philosophies of these two great thinkers of the Classical and Medieval periods, this book aims to determine whether or not there exists a common ground whereby ethical debates and dilemmas can be evaluated. Does comparison between Cicero and Aquinas offer a new pathway for moral measure, based on defined and developed principles? Do they deliver certain moral and ethical principles for human life to which each agree? Instead of a polemical diatribe, comparison between Cicero and Aquinas may edify a method of compromise and afford a more or less restrictive series of judgements about ethical quandaries.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

In A Comparative Analysis of Cicero and Aquinas, Charles P. Nemeth investigates how, despite their differences, these two figures may be the most compatible brothers in ideas ever conceived in the theory of natural law. Looking to find common threads that run between the philosophies of these two great thinkers of the Classical and Medieval periods, this book aims to determine whether or not there exists a common ground whereby ethical debates and dilemmas can be evaluated. Does comparison between Cicero and Aquinas offer a new pathway for moral measure, based on defined and developed principles? Do they deliver certain moral and ethical principles for human life to which each agree? Instead of a polemical diatribe, comparison between Cicero and Aquinas may edify a method of compromise and afford a more or less restrictive series of judgements about ethical quandaries.

More books from Bloomsbury Publishing

Cover of the book America's Political Inventors by Charles P. Nemeth
Cover of the book Coins as Cultural Texts in the World of the New Testament by Charles P. Nemeth
Cover of the book Unreasoned Verdict by Charles P. Nemeth
Cover of the book Soviet Hurricane Aces of World War 2 by Charles P. Nemeth
Cover of the book Temples of Delight by Charles P. Nemeth
Cover of the book Austrian Specialist Troops of the Napoleonic Wars by Charles P. Nemeth
Cover of the book High Noon by Charles P. Nemeth
Cover of the book A Court of Wings and Ruin by Charles P. Nemeth
Cover of the book The Fundamentals of Creative Design by Charles P. Nemeth
Cover of the book The Law of the Single European Market by Charles P. Nemeth
Cover of the book Secular Magic and the Moving Image by Charles P. Nemeth
Cover of the book The Floating Circus by Charles P. Nemeth
Cover of the book Leading from the Edge by Charles P. Nemeth
Cover of the book Concise Mushroom Guide by Charles P. Nemeth
Cover of the book The Caucasus 1942–43 by Charles P. Nemeth
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy