A Moral Theory of Solidarity

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, Politics, History & Theory, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy
Cover of the book A Moral Theory of Solidarity by Avery Kolers, OUP Oxford
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Avery Kolers ISBN: 9780191082436
Publisher: OUP Oxford Publication: June 30, 2016
Imprint: OUP Oxford Language: English
Author: Avery Kolers
ISBN: 9780191082436
Publisher: OUP Oxford
Publication: June 30, 2016
Imprint: OUP Oxford
Language: English

Accounts of solidarity typically defend it in teleological or loyalty terms, justifying it by invoking its goal of promoting justice or its expression of support for a shared community. Such solidarity seems to be a moral option rather than an obligation. In contrast, A Moral Theory of Solidarity develops a deontological theory grounded in equity. With extended reflection on the Spanish conquest of the Americas and the US Civil Rights movement, Kolers defines solidarity as political action on others' terms. Unlike mere alliances and coalitions, solidarity involves a disposition to defer to others' judgment about the best course of action. Such deference overrides individual conscience. Yet such deference is dangerous; a core challenge is then to determine when deference becomes appropriate. Kolers defends deference to those who suffer gravest inequity. Such deference constitutes equitable treatment, in three senses: it is Kantian equity, expressing each person's equal status; it is Aristotelian equity, correcting general rules for particular cases; and deference is 'being an equitable person,' sharing others' fate rather than seizing advantages that they are denied. Treating others equitably is a perfect duty; hence solidarity with victims of inequity is a perfect duty. Further, since equity is valuable in itself, irrespective of any other goal it might promote, such solidarity is intrinsically valuable, not merely instrumentally valuable. Solidarity is then not about promoting justice, but about treating people justly. A Moral Theory of Solidarity engages carefully with recent work on equity in the Kantian and Aristotelian traditions, as well as the demandingness of moral duties, collective action, and unjust benefits, and is a major contribution to a field of growing interest.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Accounts of solidarity typically defend it in teleological or loyalty terms, justifying it by invoking its goal of promoting justice or its expression of support for a shared community. Such solidarity seems to be a moral option rather than an obligation. In contrast, A Moral Theory of Solidarity develops a deontological theory grounded in equity. With extended reflection on the Spanish conquest of the Americas and the US Civil Rights movement, Kolers defines solidarity as political action on others' terms. Unlike mere alliances and coalitions, solidarity involves a disposition to defer to others' judgment about the best course of action. Such deference overrides individual conscience. Yet such deference is dangerous; a core challenge is then to determine when deference becomes appropriate. Kolers defends deference to those who suffer gravest inequity. Such deference constitutes equitable treatment, in three senses: it is Kantian equity, expressing each person's equal status; it is Aristotelian equity, correcting general rules for particular cases; and deference is 'being an equitable person,' sharing others' fate rather than seizing advantages that they are denied. Treating others equitably is a perfect duty; hence solidarity with victims of inequity is a perfect duty. Further, since equity is valuable in itself, irrespective of any other goal it might promote, such solidarity is intrinsically valuable, not merely instrumentally valuable. Solidarity is then not about promoting justice, but about treating people justly. A Moral Theory of Solidarity engages carefully with recent work on equity in the Kantian and Aristotelian traditions, as well as the demandingness of moral duties, collective action, and unjust benefits, and is a major contribution to a field of growing interest.

More books from OUP Oxford

Cover of the book The Art of the Roman Empire by Avery Kolers
Cover of the book Partnership and LLP Law 8e by Avery Kolers
Cover of the book The Foundations of International Investment Law by Avery Kolers
Cover of the book The Oxford Handbook of Africa and Economics by Avery Kolers
Cover of the book The Oxford Handbook of American Bureaucracy by Avery Kolers
Cover of the book A Dictionary of Science by Avery Kolers
Cover of the book Inherited Cardiac Disease by Avery Kolers
Cover of the book Nicolas-Louis De La Caille, Astronomer and Geodesist by Avery Kolers
Cover of the book Homer's Allusive Art by Avery Kolers
Cover of the book Sick Societies by Avery Kolers
Cover of the book Kingdom, Civitas, and County by Avery Kolers
Cover of the book The Ethics of Capital Punishment by Avery Kolers
Cover of the book Twenty Thousand Leagues under the Seas by Avery Kolers
Cover of the book The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Institutional Analysis by Avery Kolers
Cover of the book The Oxford Handbook of Indian Foreign Policy by Avery Kolers
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy