Airpower And The Cult Of The Offensive

Nonfiction, History, Middle East, Persian Gulf War, Military
Cover of the book Airpower And The Cult Of The Offensive by Major John R. Carter, Tannenberg Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Major John R. Carter ISBN: 9781786252760
Publisher: Tannenberg Publishing Publication: November 6, 2015
Imprint: Tannenberg Publishing Language: English
Author: Major John R. Carter
ISBN: 9781786252760
Publisher: Tannenberg Publishing
Publication: November 6, 2015
Imprint: Tannenberg Publishing
Language: English

The belief that airpower is inherently offensive is a recurrent theme throughout airpower theory and doctrine. Before World War I, dogmatic belief in the dominance of the offense in land warfare affected the military decisions which resulted in the disaster of the trenches. Termed the “cult of the offensive” by scholars, faith in offense became so unshakable in pre-1914 Europe that military organizations dismissed as irrelevant the numerous indications of the waning power of the offense as technological developments strengthened the defense. With airpower’s professed inclination for offense, could a cult of the offensive perniciously trap airpower doctrine and lead to similarly disastrous consequences?

The study begins by establishing the theoretical background necessary for case study analysis. Airpower defense is defined as those operations conducted to deny another force’s air operations in a designated airspace. Airpower offenses are those operations in the airspace defended by another, or operations conducted outside of one’s actively defended airspace. The relationship between offense and defense is dissected to discover that airpower defense enjoys neither an advantage of position nor of time, so traditional Clausewitzian views relative to the power of the defense do not apply to airpower. Next, the study describes those factors which may inject, or reinforce, a preferential bias for offense into airpower strategy and doctrine. A cult of the offensive is defined as an organizational belief in the power of offense so compelling that the military organization no longer evaluates its offensive doctrine objectively. This leads to an examination of the ramifications postulated to result from offensive ideology.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

The belief that airpower is inherently offensive is a recurrent theme throughout airpower theory and doctrine. Before World War I, dogmatic belief in the dominance of the offense in land warfare affected the military decisions which resulted in the disaster of the trenches. Termed the “cult of the offensive” by scholars, faith in offense became so unshakable in pre-1914 Europe that military organizations dismissed as irrelevant the numerous indications of the waning power of the offense as technological developments strengthened the defense. With airpower’s professed inclination for offense, could a cult of the offensive perniciously trap airpower doctrine and lead to similarly disastrous consequences?

The study begins by establishing the theoretical background necessary for case study analysis. Airpower defense is defined as those operations conducted to deny another force’s air operations in a designated airspace. Airpower offenses are those operations in the airspace defended by another, or operations conducted outside of one’s actively defended airspace. The relationship between offense and defense is dissected to discover that airpower defense enjoys neither an advantage of position nor of time, so traditional Clausewitzian views relative to the power of the defense do not apply to airpower. Next, the study describes those factors which may inject, or reinforce, a preferential bias for offense into airpower strategy and doctrine. A cult of the offensive is defined as an organizational belief in the power of offense so compelling that the military organization no longer evaluates its offensive doctrine objectively. This leads to an examination of the ramifications postulated to result from offensive ideology.

More books from Tannenberg Publishing

Cover of the book An Invisible Scalpel: Low-Visibility Operations in the War on Terror by Major John R. Carter
Cover of the book $1.97-“The Sledgehammer.” by Major John R. Carter
Cover of the book Gathering Of Human Intelligence In Counter-Insurgency Warfare: by Major John R. Carter
Cover of the book Airfield Seizure, The Modern 'Key To The Country' by Major John R. Carter
Cover of the book Letters On Strategy Vol. I [Illustrated Edition] by Major John R. Carter
Cover of the book Engineer Aviation Units In The Southwest Pacific Theater During WWII by Major John R. Carter
Cover of the book Into The Beehive - The Somali Habr Gidr Clan As An Adaptive Enemy by Major John R. Carter
Cover of the book Significance Of The Human Being As An Element In An Information System: by Major John R. Carter
Cover of the book To Save A City: The Berlin Airlift, 1948-1949 [Illustrated Edition] by Major John R. Carter
Cover of the book The 1973 Arab-Israeli War: The Albatross Of Decisive Victory [Illustrated Edition] by Major John R. Carter
Cover of the book Fueling the Fires of Resistance — Army Air Forces Special Operations in the Balkans during World War II [Illustrated Edition] by Major John R. Carter
Cover of the book Command Of The Air by Major John R. Carter
Cover of the book U.S. Marines In Iraq, 2003: Basrah, Baghdad And Beyond: by Major John R. Carter
Cover of the book The Lucky Seventh In The Bulge: A Case Study For The Airland Battle by Major John R. Carter
Cover of the book U.S. Marines In Battle: An-Nasiriyah, 23 March-2 April 2003 [Illustrated Edition] by Major John R. Carter
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy