Antietam And Gettysburg: Tactical Success In An Operational Void

Nonfiction, History, Modern, 19th Century, Americas, United States, Civil War Period (1850-1877), Military
Cover of the book Antietam And Gettysburg: Tactical Success In An Operational Void by Lt.-Cmdr Stephen P.  Black USN, Golden Springs Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Lt.-Cmdr Stephen P. Black USN ISBN: 9781782899280
Publisher: Golden Springs Publishing Publication: November 6, 2015
Imprint: Golden Springs Publishing Language: English
Author: Lt.-Cmdr Stephen P. Black USN
ISBN: 9781782899280
Publisher: Golden Springs Publishing
Publication: November 6, 2015
Imprint: Golden Springs Publishing
Language: English

The Battles of Antietam and Gettysburg are widely recognized as tactical victories for the Union’s Army of the Potomac. Following both battles, however, the respective commanding generals. General McClellan and General Meade, were sharply criticized for having failed to vigorously pursue General Lee and his Army of Northern Virginia in order to deliver a decisive blow. Both Union commanders offered a list of extenuating circumstances, such as battle fatigue, large casualties and lack of supplies, which precluded a “premature” pursuit of General Lee.

Upon examination, however, their inability to conceptualize a decisive pursuit of General Lee’s army points to a direct failure at the operational level of War. Both Union generals were unable to link their tactical victories to any larger strategic objective. The reasons for this from the strategic confusion of a conflict evolving from limited War to total War, and from the void in operational training that left both McClellan and Meade ill prepared to perform successfully at this critical level of Warfare.

Examining this operational void, it becomes apparent that a commander’s construct of War must be complete, that is, fully cognizant of the strategic, operational and tactical levels of War, in order to achieve success beyond the limits of the tactical battlefield. Such an examination points to the criticality of the operational level of Warfare, highlights the importance of the commander’s concept of operations and suggests that an operational commander must grow in the sense that his cognitive processes must be tuned into the dynamics of his environment, not only on a tactical level, but on the operational and strategic level.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

The Battles of Antietam and Gettysburg are widely recognized as tactical victories for the Union’s Army of the Potomac. Following both battles, however, the respective commanding generals. General McClellan and General Meade, were sharply criticized for having failed to vigorously pursue General Lee and his Army of Northern Virginia in order to deliver a decisive blow. Both Union commanders offered a list of extenuating circumstances, such as battle fatigue, large casualties and lack of supplies, which precluded a “premature” pursuit of General Lee.

Upon examination, however, their inability to conceptualize a decisive pursuit of General Lee’s army points to a direct failure at the operational level of War. Both Union generals were unable to link their tactical victories to any larger strategic objective. The reasons for this from the strategic confusion of a conflict evolving from limited War to total War, and from the void in operational training that left both McClellan and Meade ill prepared to perform successfully at this critical level of Warfare.

Examining this operational void, it becomes apparent that a commander’s construct of War must be complete, that is, fully cognizant of the strategic, operational and tactical levels of War, in order to achieve success beyond the limits of the tactical battlefield. Such an examination points to the criticality of the operational level of Warfare, highlights the importance of the commander’s concept of operations and suggests that an operational commander must grow in the sense that his cognitive processes must be tuned into the dynamics of his environment, not only on a tactical level, but on the operational and strategic level.

More books from Golden Springs Publishing

Cover of the book Grant's Emergence As A Strategic Leader July, 1863, To March, 1864 by Lt.-Cmdr Stephen P.  Black USN
Cover of the book Rosecrans’ Staff At Chickamauga by Lt.-Cmdr Stephen P.  Black USN
Cover of the book On Command: An Illustrative Study Of Command And Control In The Army Of Northern Virginia, 1863 by Lt.-Cmdr Stephen P.  Black USN
Cover of the book Towards Gettysburg: A Biography Of General John F. Reynolds by Lt.-Cmdr Stephen P.  Black USN
Cover of the book Staff Ride Handbook For The Vicksburg Campaign, December 1862-July 1863 [Illustrated Edition] by Lt.-Cmdr Stephen P.  Black USN
Cover of the book Wilder's Brigade In The Tullahoma And Chattanooga Campaigns Of The American Civil War by Lt.-Cmdr Stephen P.  Black USN
Cover of the book Economic Philosophy by Lt.-Cmdr Stephen P.  Black USN
Cover of the book Leadership In The Shenandoah Valley And North Africa: Historical Studies In Mission Command by Lt.-Cmdr Stephen P.  Black USN
Cover of the book Slaves, Contrabands, And Freedmen: Union Policy In The Civil War by Lt.-Cmdr Stephen P.  Black USN
Cover of the book Letters Of A Civil War Surgeon by Lt.-Cmdr Stephen P.  Black USN
Cover of the book Jackson And McClellan: A Study In Leadership And Doctrine by Lt.-Cmdr Stephen P.  Black USN
Cover of the book With General Sheridan In Lee's Last Campaign [Illustrated Edition] by Lt.-Cmdr Stephen P.  Black USN
Cover of the book Diving For Pleasure And Treasure by Lt.-Cmdr Stephen P.  Black USN
Cover of the book Flight Into Oblivion by Lt.-Cmdr Stephen P.  Black USN
Cover of the book Confederate High Command At Shiloh by Lt.-Cmdr Stephen P.  Black USN
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy