Approaching the U.S. Constitution

Sacred Covenant or Plaything for Lawyers and Judges

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Legal History, Constitutional, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science
Cover of the book Approaching the U.S. Constitution by Kerry L. Hunter, Lexington Books
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Kerry L. Hunter ISBN: 9780739190838
Publisher: Lexington Books Publication: June 18, 2014
Imprint: Lexington Books Language: English
Author: Kerry L. Hunter
ISBN: 9780739190838
Publisher: Lexington Books
Publication: June 18, 2014
Imprint: Lexington Books
Language: English

By reminding readers that early Supreme Court justices refused to reduce the Constitution to a mere legal document, Approaching the U.S. Constitution provides a definitive response to Reading Law by Antonin Scalia and Bryan Garner. Turning to the vision of Alexander Hamilton found in Federalists No. 78, Hunter argues that rather than seeing the judiciary as America’s legal guardian, Hamilton looked to independent individuals of integrity on the judiciary to be the nation’s collective conscience. For Hamilton, the judiciary’s authority over the legislature does not derive from positive law but is extra-legal by 'design' and is purely moral.

By emphasizing the legal expertise of judges alone, individuals such as Justice Scalia mistakenly demand that judges exercise no human ethical judgment whatsoever. Yet the more this happens, the more the “rule of law” is replaced by the rule of lawyers. Legal sophistry becomes the primary currency wherewith society’s ethical and moral questions are resolved. Moreover, the alleged neutrality of legal analysis is deceptive with its claims of judicial modesty. It is not only undemocratic, it is dictatorial and highly elitist. Public debate over questions of fairness is replaced by an exclusive legalistic debate between lawyers over what is legal. The more Scalia and Garner realize their agenda, the more all appeals to what is moral will be effectively removed from political debate. 'Conservatives' lament the 'removing God from the classroom,' by 'liberals,' yet if the advocates of legalism get their way, God will be effectively removed from the polis altogether.

The answer to preserving both separation of powers and the American commitment to unalienable human rights is to view the Supreme Court in the same way early founders such as Hamilton did and in the way President Abraham Lincoln urged. The Court’s most important function in exercising the power of judicial review is to serve as the nation’s conscience just as it did in Brown v. Board of Education.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

By reminding readers that early Supreme Court justices refused to reduce the Constitution to a mere legal document, Approaching the U.S. Constitution provides a definitive response to Reading Law by Antonin Scalia and Bryan Garner. Turning to the vision of Alexander Hamilton found in Federalists No. 78, Hunter argues that rather than seeing the judiciary as America’s legal guardian, Hamilton looked to independent individuals of integrity on the judiciary to be the nation’s collective conscience. For Hamilton, the judiciary’s authority over the legislature does not derive from positive law but is extra-legal by 'design' and is purely moral.

By emphasizing the legal expertise of judges alone, individuals such as Justice Scalia mistakenly demand that judges exercise no human ethical judgment whatsoever. Yet the more this happens, the more the “rule of law” is replaced by the rule of lawyers. Legal sophistry becomes the primary currency wherewith society’s ethical and moral questions are resolved. Moreover, the alleged neutrality of legal analysis is deceptive with its claims of judicial modesty. It is not only undemocratic, it is dictatorial and highly elitist. Public debate over questions of fairness is replaced by an exclusive legalistic debate between lawyers over what is legal. The more Scalia and Garner realize their agenda, the more all appeals to what is moral will be effectively removed from political debate. 'Conservatives' lament the 'removing God from the classroom,' by 'liberals,' yet if the advocates of legalism get their way, God will be effectively removed from the polis altogether.

The answer to preserving both separation of powers and the American commitment to unalienable human rights is to view the Supreme Court in the same way early founders such as Hamilton did and in the way President Abraham Lincoln urged. The Court’s most important function in exercising the power of judicial review is to serve as the nation’s conscience just as it did in Brown v. Board of Education.

More books from Lexington Books

Cover of the book Rethinking America’s Correctional Policies by Kerry L. Hunter
Cover of the book Islamic Law and Governance in Contemporary Iran by Kerry L. Hunter
Cover of the book Screenplay and Narrative Theory by Kerry L. Hunter
Cover of the book Transcendental Guilt by Kerry L. Hunter
Cover of the book Navigating Power by Kerry L. Hunter
Cover of the book Metaphysical Problems, Political Solutions by Kerry L. Hunter
Cover of the book Periods in Pop Culture by Kerry L. Hunter
Cover of the book Li Ang's Visionary Challenges to Gender, Sex, and Politics by Kerry L. Hunter
Cover of the book Power at the Roots by Kerry L. Hunter
Cover of the book The American-Style University at Large by Kerry L. Hunter
Cover of the book Risk and Crisis Communication by Kerry L. Hunter
Cover of the book Understanding Occupy from Wall Street to Portland by Kerry L. Hunter
Cover of the book Labor and Global Justice by Kerry L. Hunter
Cover of the book René Girard and Creative Reconciliation by Kerry L. Hunter
Cover of the book Dangerous Democracies and Partying Prime Ministers by Kerry L. Hunter
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy