Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Language Arts, Communication
Cover of the book Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning by Douglas Walton, Taylor and Francis
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Douglas Walton ISBN: 9781136687051
Publisher: Taylor and Francis Publication: November 5, 2013
Imprint: Routledge Language: English
Author: Douglas Walton
ISBN: 9781136687051
Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Publication: November 5, 2013
Imprint: Routledge
Language: English

Recent concerns with the evaluation of argumentation in informal logic and speech communication center around nondemonstrative arguments that lead to tentative or defeasible conclusions based on a balance of considerations. Such arguments do not appear to have structures of the kind traditionally identified with deductive and inductive reasoning, but are extremely common and are often called "plausible" or "presumptive," meaning that they are only provisionally acceptable even when they are correct. How is one to judge, by some clearly defined standard, whether such arguments are correct or not in a given instance? The answer lies in what are called argumentation schemes -- forms of argument (structures of inference) that enable one to identify and evaluate common types of argumentation in everyday discourse.

This book identifies 25 argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning and matches a set of critical questions to each. These two elements -- the scheme and the questions -- are then used to evaluate a given argument in a particular case in relation to a context of dialogue in which the argument occurred.

In recent writings on argumentation, there is a good deal of stress placed on how important argumentation schemes are in any attempt to evaluate common arguments in everyday reasoning as correct or fallacious, acceptable or questionable. However, the problem is that the literature thus far has not produced a precise and user-friendly enough analysis of the structures of the argumentation schemes themselves, nor have any of the documented accounts been as helpful, accessible, or systematic as they could be, especially in relation to presumptive reasoning. This book solves the problem by presenting the most common presumptive schemes in an orderly and clear way that makes them explicit and useful as precisely defined structures. As such, it will be an indispensable tool for researchers, students, and teachers in the areas of critical thinking, argumentation, speech communication, informal logic, and discourse analysis.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Recent concerns with the evaluation of argumentation in informal logic and speech communication center around nondemonstrative arguments that lead to tentative or defeasible conclusions based on a balance of considerations. Such arguments do not appear to have structures of the kind traditionally identified with deductive and inductive reasoning, but are extremely common and are often called "plausible" or "presumptive," meaning that they are only provisionally acceptable even when they are correct. How is one to judge, by some clearly defined standard, whether such arguments are correct or not in a given instance? The answer lies in what are called argumentation schemes -- forms of argument (structures of inference) that enable one to identify and evaluate common types of argumentation in everyday discourse.

This book identifies 25 argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning and matches a set of critical questions to each. These two elements -- the scheme and the questions -- are then used to evaluate a given argument in a particular case in relation to a context of dialogue in which the argument occurred.

In recent writings on argumentation, there is a good deal of stress placed on how important argumentation schemes are in any attempt to evaluate common arguments in everyday reasoning as correct or fallacious, acceptable or questionable. However, the problem is that the literature thus far has not produced a precise and user-friendly enough analysis of the structures of the argumentation schemes themselves, nor have any of the documented accounts been as helpful, accessible, or systematic as they could be, especially in relation to presumptive reasoning. This book solves the problem by presenting the most common presumptive schemes in an orderly and clear way that makes them explicit and useful as precisely defined structures. As such, it will be an indispensable tool for researchers, students, and teachers in the areas of critical thinking, argumentation, speech communication, informal logic, and discourse analysis.

More books from Taylor and Francis

Cover of the book Iraq in the Twenty-First Century by Douglas Walton
Cover of the book Environmental Injustice In The U.S. by Douglas Walton
Cover of the book Embodied Relating by Douglas Walton
Cover of the book Nationalism and Ethnic Conflict in Nepal by Douglas Walton
Cover of the book Internal Marketing: Directions for Management by Douglas Walton
Cover of the book The Female Tradition in Physical Education by Douglas Walton
Cover of the book Getting Started with REBT by Douglas Walton
Cover of the book Social Aesthetics and Moral Judgment by Douglas Walton
Cover of the book Action Research for Inclusive Education by Douglas Walton
Cover of the book Middle East and North Africa by Douglas Walton
Cover of the book Olivier Messiaen by Douglas Walton
Cover of the book Pinocchio Goes Postmodern by Douglas Walton
Cover of the book Public Service Provision and Urban Development by Douglas Walton
Cover of the book Measurement in the Social Sciences by Douglas Walton
Cover of the book Oliver Holden (1765-1844) by Douglas Walton
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy