Birth Of Modern Counterfire - The British And American Experience In World War I

Nonfiction, History, Military, World War I, Germany, British
Cover of the book Birth Of Modern Counterfire - The British And American Experience In World War I by Major William M. Campsey, Verdun Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Major William M. Campsey ISBN: 9781782897026
Publisher: Verdun Press Publication: August 15, 2014
Imprint: Verdun Press Language: English
Author: Major William M. Campsey
ISBN: 9781782897026
Publisher: Verdun Press
Publication: August 15, 2014
Imprint: Verdun Press
Language: English

This study investigates the original needs for and development of counterfire techniques in World War I. Concentrating on the experiences of the British and the Americans, the examination explores techniques of counterfire and their failures or successes.
The first chapter investigates why World War I was the first war in which modern counterfire techniques were employed. Chapter 2 describes the British experience. Chapters 3 & 4 explain how the Americans trained for and fought in the war. The last chapter analyses those techniques and principles of action that had relevance for both nations.
The study concludes that several techniques were necessary in World War I to suppress enemy artillery. First, efforts to destroy enemy artillery before battles were not as successful as efforts to neutralize it for the duration of the battle. Second, with the enormity of details necessary to collect intelligence, assign targets, preposition ammunition, and execute the program of fire, competent staff work became critical. Third, the intelligence procedures developed in position warfare were insufficient to suppress enemy artillery as the battle line moved progressively forward. Suppression of all terrain in the zone of operations that was capable of holding enemy artillery became necessary. Finally, artillery organization and control must be centralized.
The study also identifies two techniques necessary to exploit successful counterfire. First, surprise over the enemy would invariably gain the initiative. The enemy guns would not recover from the surprise for the duration of time that neutralization fires continued. Second, counterfire must be integrated into the overall fireplan and the infantry scheme of maneuver. It did the commander no good if counterfire was successful only to fail to exploit that success with maneuver.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

This study investigates the original needs for and development of counterfire techniques in World War I. Concentrating on the experiences of the British and the Americans, the examination explores techniques of counterfire and their failures or successes.
The first chapter investigates why World War I was the first war in which modern counterfire techniques were employed. Chapter 2 describes the British experience. Chapters 3 & 4 explain how the Americans trained for and fought in the war. The last chapter analyses those techniques and principles of action that had relevance for both nations.
The study concludes that several techniques were necessary in World War I to suppress enemy artillery. First, efforts to destroy enemy artillery before battles were not as successful as efforts to neutralize it for the duration of the battle. Second, with the enormity of details necessary to collect intelligence, assign targets, preposition ammunition, and execute the program of fire, competent staff work became critical. Third, the intelligence procedures developed in position warfare were insufficient to suppress enemy artillery as the battle line moved progressively forward. Suppression of all terrain in the zone of operations that was capable of holding enemy artillery became necessary. Finally, artillery organization and control must be centralized.
The study also identifies two techniques necessary to exploit successful counterfire. First, surprise over the enemy would invariably gain the initiative. The enemy guns would not recover from the surprise for the duration of time that neutralization fires continued. Second, counterfire must be integrated into the overall fireplan and the infantry scheme of maneuver. It did the commander no good if counterfire was successful only to fail to exploit that success with maneuver.

More books from Verdun Press

Cover of the book The Saga Of Pappy Gunn by Major William M. Campsey
Cover of the book Battlefield Air Interdiction By The Luftwaffe At The Battle Of Kursk - 1943 by Major William M. Campsey
Cover of the book Lightning in the Sky by Major William M. Campsey
Cover of the book Pearl Harbor: Failure of Intelligence? by Major William M. Campsey
Cover of the book Allenby’s Final Triumph [Illustrated Edition] by Major William M. Campsey
Cover of the book The Cross Of Iron by Major William M. Campsey
Cover of the book Guam by Major William M. Campsey
Cover of the book Marines In World War II - The Assault On Peleliu [Illustrated Edition] by Major William M. Campsey
Cover of the book Grapes Of Wrath by Major William M. Campsey
Cover of the book When Elephants Clash - A Critical Analysis Of Major General Paul Emil Von Lettow-Vorbeck by Major William M. Campsey
Cover of the book The Harvard Volunteers In Europe Personal Records Of Experience In Military, Ambulance, And Hospital Service by Major William M. Campsey
Cover of the book Field Marshal William Slim And The Power Of Leadership by Major William M. Campsey
Cover of the book Imperial Japanese Navy Campaign Planning And Design Of The Aleutian-Midway Campaign by Major William M. Campsey
Cover of the book Weather As The Decisive Factor Of The Aleutian Campaign by Major William M. Campsey
Cover of the book Communist Guerilla Warfare by Major William M. Campsey
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy