Blinding as a Solution to Bias

Strengthening Biomedical Science, Forensic Science, and Law

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Forensic Science, Social & Cultural Studies, Social Science
Cover of the book Blinding as a Solution to Bias by , Elsevier Science
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: ISBN: 9780128026335
Publisher: Elsevier Science Publication: January 30, 2016
Imprint: Academic Press Language: English
Author:
ISBN: 9780128026335
Publisher: Elsevier Science
Publication: January 30, 2016
Imprint: Academic Press
Language: English

What information should jurors have during court proceedings to render a just decision? Should politicians know who is donating money to their campaigns? Will scientists draw biased conclusions about drug efficacy when they know more about the patient or study population? The potential for bias in decision-making by physicians, lawyers, politicians, and scientists has been recognized for hundreds of years and drawn attention from media and scholars seeking to understand the role that conflicts of interests and other psychological processes play. However, commonly proposed solutions to biased decision-making, such as transparency (disclosing conflicts) or exclusion (avoiding conflicts) do not directly solve the underlying problem of bias and may have unintended consequences.

Robertson and Kesselheim bring together a renowned group of interdisciplinary scholars to consider another way to reduce the risk of biased decision-making: blinding. What are the advantages and limitations of blinding?  How can we quantify the biases in unblinded research? Can we develop new ways to blind decision-makers?  What are the ethical problems with withholding information from decision-makers in the course of blinding?  How can blinding be adapted to legal and scientific procedures and in institutions not previously open to this approach? Fundamentally, these sorts of questions—about who needs to know what—open new doors of inquiry for the design of scientific research studies, regulatory institutions, and courts.

The volume surveys the theory, practice, and future of blinding, drawing upon leading authors with a diverse range of methodologies and areas of expertise, including forensic sciences, medicine, law, philosophy, economics, psychology, sociology, and statistics.

  • Introduces readers to the primary policy issue this book seeks to address: biased decision-making.
  • Provides a focus on blinding as a solution to bias, which has applicability in many domains. 
  • Traces the development of blinding as a solution to bias, and explores the different ways blinding has been employed.
  • Includes case studies to explore particular uses of blinding for statisticians, radiologists, and fingerprint examiners, and whether the jurors and judges who rely upon them will value and understand blinding. 
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

What information should jurors have during court proceedings to render a just decision? Should politicians know who is donating money to their campaigns? Will scientists draw biased conclusions about drug efficacy when they know more about the patient or study population? The potential for bias in decision-making by physicians, lawyers, politicians, and scientists has been recognized for hundreds of years and drawn attention from media and scholars seeking to understand the role that conflicts of interests and other psychological processes play. However, commonly proposed solutions to biased decision-making, such as transparency (disclosing conflicts) or exclusion (avoiding conflicts) do not directly solve the underlying problem of bias and may have unintended consequences.

Robertson and Kesselheim bring together a renowned group of interdisciplinary scholars to consider another way to reduce the risk of biased decision-making: blinding. What are the advantages and limitations of blinding?  How can we quantify the biases in unblinded research? Can we develop new ways to blind decision-makers?  What are the ethical problems with withholding information from decision-makers in the course of blinding?  How can blinding be adapted to legal and scientific procedures and in institutions not previously open to this approach? Fundamentally, these sorts of questions—about who needs to know what—open new doors of inquiry for the design of scientific research studies, regulatory institutions, and courts.

The volume surveys the theory, practice, and future of blinding, drawing upon leading authors with a diverse range of methodologies and areas of expertise, including forensic sciences, medicine, law, philosophy, economics, psychology, sociology, and statistics.

More books from Elsevier Science

Cover of the book Social Justice and Library Work by
Cover of the book Primate Anatomy by
Cover of the book Measures of Personality and Social Psychological Constructs by
Cover of the book Structure to Function of G Protein-Gated Inwardly Rectifying (GIRK) Channels by
Cover of the book Earthquake Hazard, Risk and Disasters by
Cover of the book Culture, Health and Illness by
Cover of the book Corrosion of Metallic Heritage Artefacts by
Cover of the book Architecture of Network Systems by
Cover of the book Cellulases by
Cover of the book An Introduction to Biological Membranes by
Cover of the book Advances in Protein Chemistry and Structural Biology by
Cover of the book Fluvial-Tidal Sedimentology by
Cover of the book Resilience in Complex Socioecological Systems by
Cover of the book Advanced Fibrous Composite Materials for Ballistic Protection by
Cover of the book Mechatronics and Manufacturing Engineering by
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy