| Author: | Ryan Bennie Lee | ISBN: | 9781301863556 |
| Publisher: | Ryan Bennie Lee | Publication: | January 18, 2013 |
| Imprint: | Smashwords Edition | Language: | English |
| Author: | Ryan Bennie Lee |
| ISBN: | 9781301863556 |
| Publisher: | Ryan Bennie Lee |
| Publication: | January 18, 2013 |
| Imprint: | Smashwords Edition |
| Language: | English |
This is a short creativity essay, using fictional dialog/setting. The topic is about how cell phones evolved. However, the purpose was to incorporated creative fictional dialog into a non-fiction essay. I did that to make the essay more interesting to me.
The reason the topic is about cell phones is because it was a “sample essay” submitted to “AcademicExperts.us”. They were the one who picked the topic. Also, they were the one who rejected this essay, and marked it unfit. One comment they made that really puzzles me… They literal couldn't understand ‘Stone Age’ was a metaphor. However, I’m willingly to admit the first version needs some editing, since it was a time essay on a topic that have not been researched, or provided links. Because it wasn't researched it left me zero time to edit it. This is why I have rewritten it. Still, I am glad they rejected me, for I came across reviews stating “AcademicExperts.us” con writers out of money.
This is a short creativity essay, using fictional dialog/setting. The topic is about how cell phones evolved. However, the purpose was to incorporated creative fictional dialog into a non-fiction essay. I did that to make the essay more interesting to me.
The reason the topic is about cell phones is because it was a “sample essay” submitted to “AcademicExperts.us”. They were the one who picked the topic. Also, they were the one who rejected this essay, and marked it unfit. One comment they made that really puzzles me… They literal couldn't understand ‘Stone Age’ was a metaphor. However, I’m willingly to admit the first version needs some editing, since it was a time essay on a topic that have not been researched, or provided links. Because it wasn't researched it left me zero time to edit it. This is why I have rewritten it. Still, I am glad they rejected me, for I came across reviews stating “AcademicExperts.us” con writers out of money.
