Class, Politics, and the Decline of Deference in England, 1968-2000

Nonfiction, History, British, Social & Cultural Studies, Social Science
Cover of the book Class, Politics, and the Decline of Deference in England, 1968-2000 by Florence Sutcliffe-Braithwaite, OUP Oxford
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Florence Sutcliffe-Braithwaite ISBN: 9780192540720
Publisher: OUP Oxford Publication: March 1, 2018
Imprint: OUP Oxford Language: English
Author: Florence Sutcliffe-Braithwaite
ISBN: 9780192540720
Publisher: OUP Oxford
Publication: March 1, 2018
Imprint: OUP Oxford
Language: English

In late twentieth-century England, inequality was rocketing, yet some have suggested that the politics of class was declining in significance, while others argue that class identities lost little power. Neither interpretation is satisfactory: class remained important to 'ordinary' people's narratives about social change and their own identities throughout the period 1968-2000, but in changing ways. Using self-narratives drawn from a wide range of sources - the raw materials of sociological studies, transcripts from oral history projects, Mass Observation, and autobiography - the book examines class identities and narratives of social change between 1968 and 2000, showing that by the end of the period, class was often seen as an historical identity, related to background and heritage, and that many felt strict class boundaries had blurred quite profoundly since 1945. Class snobberies 'went underground', as many people from all backgrounds began to assert that what was important was authenticity, individuality, and ordinariness. In fact, Sutcliffe-Braithwaite argues that it is more useful to understand the cultural changes of these years through the lens of the decline of deference, which transformed people's attitudes towards class, and towards politics. The study also examines the claim that Thatcher and New Labour wrote class out of politics, arguing that this simple - and highly political - narrative misses important points. Thatcher was driven by political ideology and necessity to try to dismiss the importance of class, while the New Labour project was good at listening to voters - particularly swing voters in marginal seats - and echoing back what they were increasingly saying about the blurring of class lines and the importance of ordinariness. But this did not add up to an abandonment of a majoritarian project, as New Labour reoriented their political project to emphasize using the state to empower the individual.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

In late twentieth-century England, inequality was rocketing, yet some have suggested that the politics of class was declining in significance, while others argue that class identities lost little power. Neither interpretation is satisfactory: class remained important to 'ordinary' people's narratives about social change and their own identities throughout the period 1968-2000, but in changing ways. Using self-narratives drawn from a wide range of sources - the raw materials of sociological studies, transcripts from oral history projects, Mass Observation, and autobiography - the book examines class identities and narratives of social change between 1968 and 2000, showing that by the end of the period, class was often seen as an historical identity, related to background and heritage, and that many felt strict class boundaries had blurred quite profoundly since 1945. Class snobberies 'went underground', as many people from all backgrounds began to assert that what was important was authenticity, individuality, and ordinariness. In fact, Sutcliffe-Braithwaite argues that it is more useful to understand the cultural changes of these years through the lens of the decline of deference, which transformed people's attitudes towards class, and towards politics. The study also examines the claim that Thatcher and New Labour wrote class out of politics, arguing that this simple - and highly political - narrative misses important points. Thatcher was driven by political ideology and necessity to try to dismiss the importance of class, while the New Labour project was good at listening to voters - particularly swing voters in marginal seats - and echoing back what they were increasingly saying about the blurring of class lines and the importance of ordinariness. But this did not add up to an abandonment of a majoritarian project, as New Labour reoriented their political project to emphasize using the state to empower the individual.

More books from OUP Oxford

Cover of the book Madrid Tales by Florence Sutcliffe-Braithwaite
Cover of the book The Oxford Handbook of Genocide Studies by Florence Sutcliffe-Braithwaite
Cover of the book Galaxies: A Very Short Introduction by Florence Sutcliffe-Braithwaite
Cover of the book Taking a Case to the European Court of Human Rights by Florence Sutcliffe-Braithwaite
Cover of the book Combinatorics: Ancient & Modern by Florence Sutcliffe-Braithwaite
Cover of the book Fair Trade For All: How Trade Can Promote Development by Florence Sutcliffe-Braithwaite
Cover of the book A Dictionary of Ecology by Florence Sutcliffe-Braithwaite
Cover of the book The History of Chemistry: A Very Short Introduction by Florence Sutcliffe-Braithwaite
Cover of the book The Story of Life by Florence Sutcliffe-Braithwaite
Cover of the book Everyday Life in British Government by Florence Sutcliffe-Braithwaite
Cover of the book The Soviet Union: A Very Short Introduction by Florence Sutcliffe-Braithwaite
Cover of the book The Wild Ass's Skin by Florence Sutcliffe-Braithwaite
Cover of the book Law and Gender by Florence Sutcliffe-Braithwaite
Cover of the book The Law of Nations in Global History by Florence Sutcliffe-Braithwaite
Cover of the book The Treatment of Bipolar Disorder by Florence Sutcliffe-Braithwaite
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy