Commander’s Intent Of Major General Joseph Hooker During The Chancellorsville Campaign

Nonfiction, History, Modern, 19th Century, Americas, United States, Civil War Period (1850-1877), Military
Cover of the book Commander’s Intent Of Major General Joseph Hooker During The Chancellorsville Campaign by Major William M. Jurney USMC, Golden Springs Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Major William M. Jurney USMC ISBN: 9781782899310
Publisher: Golden Springs Publishing Publication: November 6, 2015
Imprint: Golden Springs Publishing Language: English
Author: Major William M. Jurney USMC
ISBN: 9781782899310
Publisher: Golden Springs Publishing
Publication: November 6, 2015
Imprint: Golden Springs Publishing
Language: English

Did “Fighting Joe” Hooker of the Army of the Potomac lose his nerve during the Chancellorsville Campaign of 1863? Perhaps history has failed to recognize Major General Joseph Hooker’s true commander’s intent for this campaign. Hooker’s intent was simple: maneuver forces to Lee’s flank and rear in order to force a withdrawal of Confederate troops from Fredericksburg. Hooker had no intention of engaging in a “risky confrontation” with General Robert E. Lee and the Army of Northern Virginia.
Hooker’s approach for planning his spring offensive would focus the Army of Potomac’s efforts toward outmaneuvering Lee’s Army of Northern Virginia. Hooker had put forth the idea of moving on Richmond and Lincoln advised him that his objective was Lee’s army and not Richmond. Hooker does pursue Lee’s army, as the main objective and not Richmond as the President had directed but the means that Hooker pursued to that end are misleading. Hooker entered what he considered the initial stage of his spring offensive at Chancellorsville thinking that he would first defeat Lee’s army by maneuver. Prior to Chancellorsville, however, Hooker was already making preparations for driving to Richmond.

Hooker had intended to confront Lee with the dilemma of being threatened from all sides. Unfortunately, Hooker had failed to communicate his intentions for his army’s movements of May 1, 1863 and confusion ran rampant among his subordinate commanders. Almost exclusively, Hooker developed the actual details of the plan himself. This flaw would result in numerous disconnects in Hooker’s plan.

Hooker’s plan would fail due to his own steadfast belief in the ability of his plan to force Lee to withdraw. To say that Lee defeated the Army of the Potomac is misleading because Lee did not defeat the army, he defeated Hooker as he fought a very effective defensive battle that removed the Federal threat from Virginia due to Hooker’s failings as an army commander.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Did “Fighting Joe” Hooker of the Army of the Potomac lose his nerve during the Chancellorsville Campaign of 1863? Perhaps history has failed to recognize Major General Joseph Hooker’s true commander’s intent for this campaign. Hooker’s intent was simple: maneuver forces to Lee’s flank and rear in order to force a withdrawal of Confederate troops from Fredericksburg. Hooker had no intention of engaging in a “risky confrontation” with General Robert E. Lee and the Army of Northern Virginia.
Hooker’s approach for planning his spring offensive would focus the Army of Potomac’s efforts toward outmaneuvering Lee’s Army of Northern Virginia. Hooker had put forth the idea of moving on Richmond and Lincoln advised him that his objective was Lee’s army and not Richmond. Hooker does pursue Lee’s army, as the main objective and not Richmond as the President had directed but the means that Hooker pursued to that end are misleading. Hooker entered what he considered the initial stage of his spring offensive at Chancellorsville thinking that he would first defeat Lee’s army by maneuver. Prior to Chancellorsville, however, Hooker was already making preparations for driving to Richmond.

Hooker had intended to confront Lee with the dilemma of being threatened from all sides. Unfortunately, Hooker had failed to communicate his intentions for his army’s movements of May 1, 1863 and confusion ran rampant among his subordinate commanders. Almost exclusively, Hooker developed the actual details of the plan himself. This flaw would result in numerous disconnects in Hooker’s plan.

Hooker’s plan would fail due to his own steadfast belief in the ability of his plan to force Lee to withdraw. To say that Lee defeated the Army of the Potomac is misleading because Lee did not defeat the army, he defeated Hooker as he fought a very effective defensive battle that removed the Federal threat from Virginia due to Hooker’s failings as an army commander.

More books from Golden Springs Publishing

Cover of the book Operational Raids: Cavalry In The Vicksburg Campaign, 1862-1863 by Major William M. Jurney USMC
Cover of the book Major General Philip H. Sheridan And The Employment Of His Division During The Battle Of Chickamauga by Major William M. Jurney USMC
Cover of the book High Tide At Gettysburg: The Campaign In Pennsylvania by Major William M. Jurney USMC
Cover of the book Battle Of Antietam, Staff Ride Guide [Illustrated Edition] by Major William M. Jurney USMC
Cover of the book It Was Sheridan's Fault Not Custer's: LTG Sheridan’s Campaign Plans Against The Plain Indians by Major William M. Jurney USMC
Cover of the book American Infidel by Major William M. Jurney USMC
Cover of the book Wall Street Stock Selector by Major William M. Jurney USMC
Cover of the book Fredericksburg Staff Ride: Briefing Book [Illustrated Edition] by Major William M. Jurney USMC
Cover of the book Confederate High Command At Shiloh by Major William M. Jurney USMC
Cover of the book Texas In The Confederacy by Major William M. Jurney USMC
Cover of the book When They Burned the White House [Illustrated Edition] by Major William M. Jurney USMC
Cover of the book Analysis Of The Relationship Between Technology And Strategy And How They Shaped The Confederate States Navy [Illustrated Edition] by Major William M. Jurney USMC
Cover of the book Comparison Of Initiative During The 1864 Virginia Overland Campaign by Major William M. Jurney USMC
Cover of the book Major General James Scott Negley And His Division At Chickamauga: A Historical Analysis by Major William M. Jurney USMC
Cover of the book The Four Decisions That Changed The Course Of The American Revolution by Major William M. Jurney USMC
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy