Comments on Jacques Maritain's Book (1935) Philosophy of Nature

Nonfiction, Science & Nature, Science, Other Sciences, Philosophy & Social Aspects, Religion & Spirituality
Cover of the book Comments on Jacques Maritain's Book (1935) Philosophy of Nature by Razie Mah, Razie Mah
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Razie Mah ISBN: 9781942824497
Publisher: Razie Mah Publication: July 1, 2018
Imprint: Smashwords Edition Language: English
Author: Razie Mah
ISBN: 9781942824497
Publisher: Razie Mah
Publication: July 1, 2018
Imprint: Smashwords Edition
Language: English

Philosopher Jacques Maritain serves as a keystone in the recovery from the excesses of the Age of Ideas (as defined by John Deely, in his masterwork, Four Ages of Understanding). Maritain strives to recover Thomism during the 20th century. But, there are difficulties. The mechanical philosophers of the 17th century jettisoned scholasticism. The scam worked for over three hundred years.
The lockout of Aristotle coincided with a change of terminology. Today, scholastic words stand as vessels. But, we have difficulty re-conceiving the contents. The change of terminology comes on the heels of another change, well underway in the 13th century, from Plato to Aristotle as a paradigm of inquiry.
Now comes another shift.
In the late 19th century, Charles S. Peirce discovered that the sign is a triadic relation. Ironically, the Baroque scholastic, John Poinsot, formulated the sign as a triadic relation in the 17th century. No one knew. In fact, no one would know today if Maritain had not suggested that Deely look into the matter. Deely found John Poinsot's definition of sign.
Today, Daniel Novotny carries on the study of the Baroque scholastics.
Aristotle's causalities participate in triadic relations.
When the early modernists exiled Aristotle, they also blocked the way to understanding triadic relations.
Maritain's book opens the door to a recovery.
In these comments, the shifting balance among the empirical sciences, religion and natural philosophy are rendered as judgments. There are two types of judgments. Reflective judgments do not unfold into category-based nested forms. Actionable judgments do.
Here is a scholarly portal into the fourth age of understanding.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Philosopher Jacques Maritain serves as a keystone in the recovery from the excesses of the Age of Ideas (as defined by John Deely, in his masterwork, Four Ages of Understanding). Maritain strives to recover Thomism during the 20th century. But, there are difficulties. The mechanical philosophers of the 17th century jettisoned scholasticism. The scam worked for over three hundred years.
The lockout of Aristotle coincided with a change of terminology. Today, scholastic words stand as vessels. But, we have difficulty re-conceiving the contents. The change of terminology comes on the heels of another change, well underway in the 13th century, from Plato to Aristotle as a paradigm of inquiry.
Now comes another shift.
In the late 19th century, Charles S. Peirce discovered that the sign is a triadic relation. Ironically, the Baroque scholastic, John Poinsot, formulated the sign as a triadic relation in the 17th century. No one knew. In fact, no one would know today if Maritain had not suggested that Deely look into the matter. Deely found John Poinsot's definition of sign.
Today, Daniel Novotny carries on the study of the Baroque scholastics.
Aristotle's causalities participate in triadic relations.
When the early modernists exiled Aristotle, they also blocked the way to understanding triadic relations.
Maritain's book opens the door to a recovery.
In these comments, the shifting balance among the empirical sciences, religion and natural philosophy are rendered as judgments. There are two types of judgments. Reflective judgments do not unfold into category-based nested forms. Actionable judgments do.
Here is a scholarly portal into the fourth age of understanding.

More books from Razie Mah

Cover of the book Comments on “A Bio-Cultural-Historical Approach to the Study of Development (2016)” by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Peter Burfeind’s Book (2014) Gnostic America by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Mariusz Tabaczek’s Essay (2019) "What do God and Creatures Really Do in an Evolutionary Change?" by Razie Mah
Cover of the book A Primer for the Category-Based Nested Form by Razie Mah
Cover of the book An Essay on Causality in the Empirical and Social Sciences by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Carlos Blanco-Perez's Essay (2018) "On the Principles of a Social Theory" by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Religious Experience (1985) by Wayne Proudfoot by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Original Sin and Original Death: Romans 5:12-19 by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Matthew Minerd’s Essay (2019) "Thomism and the Formal Object of Logic" by Razie Mah
Cover of the book A Primer for Individual In Community by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on David Reich's Book (2018) Who We Are and How We Got Here by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Jeremy Cohen's Essay (1980) "Original Sin as The Evil Inclination" by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Andrew Hollingsworth’s Paper (2016) Ecos of Meaning by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Lessons 1-12 for Instructor’s Guide to An Archaeology of the Fall and Related Scriptures by Razie Mah
Cover of the book Comments on Tomas Bogardus and Mallorie Urban’s Essay (2017) How to Tell... by Razie Mah
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy