Conscience, Equity and the Court of Chancery in Early Modern England

Nonfiction, History
Cover of the book Conscience, Equity and the Court of Chancery in Early Modern England by Dennis R. Klinck, Taylor and Francis
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Dennis R. Klinck ISBN: 9781317161943
Publisher: Taylor and Francis Publication: May 23, 2016
Imprint: Routledge Language: English
Author: Dennis R. Klinck
ISBN: 9781317161943
Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Publication: May 23, 2016
Imprint: Routledge
Language: English

Judicial equity developed in England during the medieval period, providing an alternative access to justice for cases that the rigid structures of the common law could not accommodate. Where the common law was constrained by precedent and strict procedural and substantive rules, equity relied on principles of natural justice - or 'conscience' - to decide cases and right wrongs. Overseen by the Lord Chancellor, equity became one of the twin pillars of the English legal system with the Court of Chancery playing an ever greater role in the legal life of the nation. Yet, whilst the Chancery was commonly - and still sometimes is - referred to as a 'court of conscience', there is remarkably little consensus about what this actually means, or indeed whose conscience is under discussion. This study tackles the difficult subject of the place of conscience in the development of English equity during a crucial period of legal history. Addressing the notion of conscience as a juristic principle in the Court of Chancery during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, the book explores how the concept was understood and how it figured in legal judgment. Drawing upon both legal and broader cultural materials, it explains how that understanding differed from modern notions and how it might have been more consistent with criteria we commonly associate with objective legal judgement than the modern, more 'subjective', concept of conscience. The study culminates with an examination of the chancellorship of Lord Nottingham (1673-82), who, because of his efforts to transform equity from a jurisdiction associated with discretion into one based on rules, is conventionally regarded as the father of modern, 'systematic' equity. From a broader perspective, this study can be seen as a contribution to the enduring discussion of the relationship between 'formal' accounts of law, which see it as systems of rules, and less formal accounts, which try to make room for intuitive moral or prudential reasoning.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Judicial equity developed in England during the medieval period, providing an alternative access to justice for cases that the rigid structures of the common law could not accommodate. Where the common law was constrained by precedent and strict procedural and substantive rules, equity relied on principles of natural justice - or 'conscience' - to decide cases and right wrongs. Overseen by the Lord Chancellor, equity became one of the twin pillars of the English legal system with the Court of Chancery playing an ever greater role in the legal life of the nation. Yet, whilst the Chancery was commonly - and still sometimes is - referred to as a 'court of conscience', there is remarkably little consensus about what this actually means, or indeed whose conscience is under discussion. This study tackles the difficult subject of the place of conscience in the development of English equity during a crucial period of legal history. Addressing the notion of conscience as a juristic principle in the Court of Chancery during the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries, the book explores how the concept was understood and how it figured in legal judgment. Drawing upon both legal and broader cultural materials, it explains how that understanding differed from modern notions and how it might have been more consistent with criteria we commonly associate with objective legal judgement than the modern, more 'subjective', concept of conscience. The study culminates with an examination of the chancellorship of Lord Nottingham (1673-82), who, because of his efforts to transform equity from a jurisdiction associated with discretion into one based on rules, is conventionally regarded as the father of modern, 'systematic' equity. From a broader perspective, this study can be seen as a contribution to the enduring discussion of the relationship between 'formal' accounts of law, which see it as systems of rules, and less formal accounts, which try to make room for intuitive moral or prudential reasoning.

More books from Taylor and Francis

Cover of the book Buddhist Moral Philosophy by Dennis R. Klinck
Cover of the book Advancing Equity and Achievement in America's Diverse Schools by Dennis R. Klinck
Cover of the book The Psychology Of Addiction by Dennis R. Klinck
Cover of the book Signs of Autism in Infants by Dennis R. Klinck
Cover of the book Carbon Governance, Climate Change and Business Transformation by Dennis R. Klinck
Cover of the book Game Theory in Management by Dennis R. Klinck
Cover of the book Victoria Welby and the Science of Signs by Dennis R. Klinck
Cover of the book Fairbridge: Empire and Child Migration by Dennis R. Klinck
Cover of the book Dynamics In Pacific Asia by Dennis R. Klinck
Cover of the book Industry and Work in Contemporary Capitalism by Dennis R. Klinck
Cover of the book Interracial Families by Dennis R. Klinck
Cover of the book Knowledge-Based Services, Internationalization and Regional Development by Dennis R. Klinck
Cover of the book Language, Communication and Education by Dennis R. Klinck
Cover of the book Spelling Recovery by Dennis R. Klinck
Cover of the book Sexual Identities and Sexuality in Social Work by Dennis R. Klinck
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy