Constitutional Personae

Heroes, Soldiers, Minimalists, and Mutes

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Constitutional, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science
Cover of the book Constitutional Personae by Cass R. Sunstein, Oxford University Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Cass R. Sunstein ISBN: 9780190222697
Publisher: Oxford University Press Publication: September 7, 2015
Imprint: Oxford University Press Language: English
Author: Cass R. Sunstein
ISBN: 9780190222697
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Publication: September 7, 2015
Imprint: Oxford University Press
Language: English

Since America's founding, the U.S. Supreme Court had issued a vast number of decisions on a staggeringly wide variety of subjects. And hundreds of judges have occupied the bench. Yet as Cass R. Sunstein, the eminent legal scholar and bestselling co-author of Nudge, points out, almost every one of the Justices fits into a very small number of types regardless of ideology: the hero, the soldier, the minimalist, and the mute. Heroes are willing to invoke the Constitution to invalidate state laws, federal legislation, and prior Court decisions. They loudly embrace first principles and are prone to flair, employing dramatic language to fundamentally reshape the law. Soldiers, on the other hand, are skeptical of judicial power, and typically defer to decisions made by the political branches. Minimalists favor small steps and only incremental change. They worry that bold reversals of long-established traditions may be counterproductive, producing a backlash that only leads to another reversal. Mutes would rather say nothing at all about the big constitutional issues, and instead tend to decide cases on narrow grounds or keep controversial cases out of the Court altogether by denying standing. As Sunstein shows, many of the most important constitutional debates are in fact contests between the four Personae. Whether the issue involves slavery, gender equality, same-sex marriage, executive power, surveillance, or freedom of speech, debates have turned on choices made among the four Personae--choices that derive as much from psychology as constitutional theory. Sunstein himself defends a form of minimalism, arguing that it is the best approach in a self-governing society of free people. More broadly, he casts a genuinely novel light on longstanding disputes over the proper way to interpret the constitution, demonstrating that behind virtually every decision and beneath all of the abstract theory lurk the four Personae. By emphasizing the centrality of character types, Sunstein forces us to rethink everything we know about how the Supreme Court works.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Since America's founding, the U.S. Supreme Court had issued a vast number of decisions on a staggeringly wide variety of subjects. And hundreds of judges have occupied the bench. Yet as Cass R. Sunstein, the eminent legal scholar and bestselling co-author of Nudge, points out, almost every one of the Justices fits into a very small number of types regardless of ideology: the hero, the soldier, the minimalist, and the mute. Heroes are willing to invoke the Constitution to invalidate state laws, federal legislation, and prior Court decisions. They loudly embrace first principles and are prone to flair, employing dramatic language to fundamentally reshape the law. Soldiers, on the other hand, are skeptical of judicial power, and typically defer to decisions made by the political branches. Minimalists favor small steps and only incremental change. They worry that bold reversals of long-established traditions may be counterproductive, producing a backlash that only leads to another reversal. Mutes would rather say nothing at all about the big constitutional issues, and instead tend to decide cases on narrow grounds or keep controversial cases out of the Court altogether by denying standing. As Sunstein shows, many of the most important constitutional debates are in fact contests between the four Personae. Whether the issue involves slavery, gender equality, same-sex marriage, executive power, surveillance, or freedom of speech, debates have turned on choices made among the four Personae--choices that derive as much from psychology as constitutional theory. Sunstein himself defends a form of minimalism, arguing that it is the best approach in a self-governing society of free people. More broadly, he casts a genuinely novel light on longstanding disputes over the proper way to interpret the constitution, demonstrating that behind virtually every decision and beneath all of the abstract theory lurk the four Personae. By emphasizing the centrality of character types, Sunstein forces us to rethink everything we know about how the Supreme Court works.

More books from Oxford University Press

Cover of the book Government against Itself by Cass R. Sunstein
Cover of the book A Cabinet of Byzantine Curiosities by Cass R. Sunstein
Cover of the book Dead Man's Island Level 2 Oxford Bookworms Library by Cass R. Sunstein
Cover of the book Doing Valuable Time by Cass R. Sunstein
Cover of the book World War II at Sea by Cass R. Sunstein
Cover of the book The Atlantic in World History by Cass R. Sunstein
Cover of the book States in Disguise by Cass R. Sunstein
Cover of the book The Enlightenment on Trial by Cass R. Sunstein
Cover of the book Fool's Gold? by Cass R. Sunstein
Cover of the book Understanding French Verse by Cass R. Sunstein
Cover of the book New World Faiths by Cass R. Sunstein
Cover of the book A Wolf in the City by Cass R. Sunstein
Cover of the book The Oxford Companion to American Food and Drink by Cass R. Sunstein
Cover of the book Wasting Away by Cass R. Sunstein
Cover of the book Playing in the Cathedral by Cass R. Sunstein
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy