Darwinian Misadventures in the Humanities

Nonfiction, Science & Nature, Science, Other Sciences, Philosophy & Social Aspects, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy
Cover of the book Darwinian Misadventures in the Humanities by Eugene Goodheart, Taylor and Francis
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Eugene Goodheart ISBN: 9781351523653
Publisher: Taylor and Francis Publication: May 4, 2018
Imprint: Routledge Language: English
Author: Eugene Goodheart
ISBN: 9781351523653
Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Publication: May 4, 2018
Imprint: Routledge
Language: English

In recent decades the humanities have been in thrall to postmodern skepticism, while Darwinists, brimming with confidence in the genuine progress they have made in the sciences of biology and psychology, have set their sights on rescuing the humanities from the ravages of postmodernism. In this volume, Eugene Goodheart attacks the neo-Darwinist approach to the arts and articulates a powerful defense of humanist criticism.

E. O. Wilson, the distinguished Harvard biologist, has spoken of converting philosophy into science, substituting science for religion, and formulating a biological theory of literature and the arts in Consilence: The Unity of Knowledge. Goodheart demonstrates that Wilson's efforts, and those of his colleagues Richard Dawkins, Steven Pinker, and Daniel Dennett among others, have resulted in scientism rather than science. If, for example, Dawkins had contented himself in The Selfish Gene with the claim that Darwinism had made worthless other answers to the question of how we have evolved, he would have given offense only to creationists, but questions of meaning and purpose are of another order.

Contemporary Darwinist critiques err in assuming that art and traditional criticism aspire to truths that can be codified in terms of scientific laws. If this were so, we would have to regard the speculations of Plato, Aristotle, Augustine, Montaigne, Shakespeare, and Rousseau as worthless. Goodheart exposes the philistinism of literary Darwinism, the bad faith and inverted fundamentalism of the Darwinian approach to religion, and the dangers of the eff ort to create a Darwinian ethical system. Taken together, Goodheart's arguments show that in moving beyond their area of competence, the neo -Darwinists commit an ideology, not a science.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

In recent decades the humanities have been in thrall to postmodern skepticism, while Darwinists, brimming with confidence in the genuine progress they have made in the sciences of biology and psychology, have set their sights on rescuing the humanities from the ravages of postmodernism. In this volume, Eugene Goodheart attacks the neo-Darwinist approach to the arts and articulates a powerful defense of humanist criticism.

E. O. Wilson, the distinguished Harvard biologist, has spoken of converting philosophy into science, substituting science for religion, and formulating a biological theory of literature and the arts in Consilence: The Unity of Knowledge. Goodheart demonstrates that Wilson's efforts, and those of his colleagues Richard Dawkins, Steven Pinker, and Daniel Dennett among others, have resulted in scientism rather than science. If, for example, Dawkins had contented himself in The Selfish Gene with the claim that Darwinism had made worthless other answers to the question of how we have evolved, he would have given offense only to creationists, but questions of meaning and purpose are of another order.

Contemporary Darwinist critiques err in assuming that art and traditional criticism aspire to truths that can be codified in terms of scientific laws. If this were so, we would have to regard the speculations of Plato, Aristotle, Augustine, Montaigne, Shakespeare, and Rousseau as worthless. Goodheart exposes the philistinism of literary Darwinism, the bad faith and inverted fundamentalism of the Darwinian approach to religion, and the dangers of the eff ort to create a Darwinian ethical system. Taken together, Goodheart's arguments show that in moving beyond their area of competence, the neo -Darwinists commit an ideology, not a science.

More books from Taylor and Francis

Cover of the book South America on the Eve of Emancipation by Eugene Goodheart
Cover of the book Status, Power, and Legitimacy by Eugene Goodheart
Cover of the book The Geopolitics of American Insecurity by Eugene Goodheart
Cover of the book Shoguns City by Eugene Goodheart
Cover of the book Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises and the Environment by Eugene Goodheart
Cover of the book Healthcare Architecture as Infrastructure by Eugene Goodheart
Cover of the book My Dad Makes the Best Boats by Eugene Goodheart
Cover of the book Aid, Insurgencies and Conflict Transformation by Eugene Goodheart
Cover of the book National Healths by Eugene Goodheart
Cover of the book Constructing a Sense of Place by Eugene Goodheart
Cover of the book Human Rights and Military Intervention by Eugene Goodheart
Cover of the book Russell-Arg Philosophers by Eugene Goodheart
Cover of the book Urban Development in the Muslim World by Eugene Goodheart
Cover of the book Financialisation and Development in Asia by Eugene Goodheart
Cover of the book Political Psychology of Turkish Political Behavior by Eugene Goodheart
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy