Dramatic Action in Greek Tragedy and Noh

Reading with and beyond Aristotle

Fiction & Literature, Literary Theory & Criticism, Asian, Far Eastern, Ancient & Classical, Nonfiction, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy, Ancient
Cover of the book Dramatic Action in Greek Tragedy and Noh by Mae J. Smethurst, Lexington Books
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Mae J. Smethurst ISBN: 9780739172438
Publisher: Lexington Books Publication: February 21, 2013
Imprint: Lexington Books Language: English
Author: Mae J. Smethurst
ISBN: 9780739172438
Publisher: Lexington Books
Publication: February 21, 2013
Imprint: Lexington Books
Language: English

This book explores the ramifications of understanding the similarities and differences between the tragedies of Euripides and Sophocles and realistic Japanese noh. First, it looks at the relationship of Aristotle’s definition of tragedy to the tragedies he favored. Next, his definition is applied to realistic noh*,* in order to show how they do and do not conform to his definition. In the third and fourth chapters, the focus moves to those junctures in the dramas that Aristotle considered crucial to a complex plot - recognitions and sudden reversals -, and shows how they are presented in performance. Chapter 3 examines the climactic moments of realistic noh and demonstrates that it is at precisely these moments that a third actor becomes involved in the dialogue or that an actor in various ways steps out of character. Chapter 4 explores how plays by Euripides and Sophocles deal with critical turns in the plot, as Aristotle defined it. It is not by an actor stepping out of character, but by the playwright’s involvement of the third actor in the dialogue. The argument of this book reveals a similar symbiosis between plot and performance in both dramatic forms. By looking at noh through the lens of Aristotle and two Greek tragedies that he favored, the book uncovers first an Aristotelian plot structure in realistic noh and the relationship between the crucial points in the plot and its performance; and on the Greek side, looking at the tragedies through the lens of noh suggests a hitherto unnoticed relationship between the structure of the tragedies and their performance, that is, the involvement of the third actor at the climactic moments of the plot. This observation helps to account for Aristotle’s view that tragedy be limited to three actors.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

This book explores the ramifications of understanding the similarities and differences between the tragedies of Euripides and Sophocles and realistic Japanese noh. First, it looks at the relationship of Aristotle’s definition of tragedy to the tragedies he favored. Next, his definition is applied to realistic noh*,* in order to show how they do and do not conform to his definition. In the third and fourth chapters, the focus moves to those junctures in the dramas that Aristotle considered crucial to a complex plot - recognitions and sudden reversals -, and shows how they are presented in performance. Chapter 3 examines the climactic moments of realistic noh and demonstrates that it is at precisely these moments that a third actor becomes involved in the dialogue or that an actor in various ways steps out of character. Chapter 4 explores how plays by Euripides and Sophocles deal with critical turns in the plot, as Aristotle defined it. It is not by an actor stepping out of character, but by the playwright’s involvement of the third actor in the dialogue. The argument of this book reveals a similar symbiosis between plot and performance in both dramatic forms. By looking at noh through the lens of Aristotle and two Greek tragedies that he favored, the book uncovers first an Aristotelian plot structure in realistic noh and the relationship between the crucial points in the plot and its performance; and on the Greek side, looking at the tragedies through the lens of noh suggests a hitherto unnoticed relationship between the structure of the tragedies and their performance, that is, the involvement of the third actor at the climactic moments of the plot. This observation helps to account for Aristotle’s view that tragedy be limited to three actors.

More books from Lexington Books

Cover of the book Unlocking the Wealth of Indian Nations by Mae J. Smethurst
Cover of the book Reflecting on Service-Learning in Higher Education by Mae J. Smethurst
Cover of the book Communication Centers and Oral Communication Programs in Higher Education by Mae J. Smethurst
Cover of the book Educational Ecologies by Mae J. Smethurst
Cover of the book The Art of Avaz and Mohammad Reza Shajarian by Mae J. Smethurst
Cover of the book Folk Art and Modern Culture in Republican China by Mae J. Smethurst
Cover of the book Fulda Gap by Mae J. Smethurst
Cover of the book Sound, Image, and National Imaginary in the Construction of Latin/o American Identities by Mae J. Smethurst
Cover of the book A Theory of Feelings by Mae J. Smethurst
Cover of the book The First U.S. History Textbooks by Mae J. Smethurst
Cover of the book The Obama Presidency by Mae J. Smethurst
Cover of the book The Habits of Racism by Mae J. Smethurst
Cover of the book Innovations in English Language Teaching in India by Mae J. Smethurst
Cover of the book Presidential Debate Negotiation from 1960 to 1988 by Mae J. Smethurst
Cover of the book Catholic Theology of Marriage in the Era of HIV and AIDS by Mae J. Smethurst
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy