Epistemology for the Rest of the World

Nonfiction, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy, Epistemology, Eastern
Cover of the book Epistemology for the Rest of the World by , Oxford University Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: ISBN: 9780190865108
Publisher: Oxford University Press Publication: June 6, 2018
Imprint: Oxford University Press Language: English
Author:
ISBN: 9780190865108
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Publication: June 6, 2018
Imprint: Oxford University Press
Language: English

Since the heyday of ordinary language philosophy, Anglophone epistemologists have devoted a great deal of attention to the English word 'know' and to English sentences used to attribute knowledge. Even today, many epistemologists, including contextualists and subject-sensitive invariantists are concerned with the truth conditions of "S knows that p," or the proposition it expresses. In all of this literature, the method of cases is used, where a situation is described in English, and then philosophers judge whether it is true that S knows that p, or whether saying "S knows that p" is false, deviant, etc. in that situation. However, English is just one of over 6000 languages spoken around the world, and is the native language of less than 6% of the world's population. When Western epistemology first emerged, in ancient Greece, English did not even exist. So why should we think that facts about the English word "know," the concept it expresses, or subtle semantic properties of "S knows that p" have important implications for epistemology? Are the properties of the English word "know" and the English sentence 'S knows that p' shared by their translations in most or all languages? If that turned out to be true, it would be a remarkable fact that cries out for an explanation. But if it turned out to be false, what are the implications for epistemology? Should epistemologists study knowledge attributions in languages other than English with the same diligence they have shown for the study of English knowledge attributions? If not, why not? In what ways do the concepts expressed by 'know' and its counterparts in different languages differ? And what should epistemologists make of all this? The papers collected here discuss these questions and related issues, and aim to contribute to this important topic and epistemology in general.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Since the heyday of ordinary language philosophy, Anglophone epistemologists have devoted a great deal of attention to the English word 'know' and to English sentences used to attribute knowledge. Even today, many epistemologists, including contextualists and subject-sensitive invariantists are concerned with the truth conditions of "S knows that p," or the proposition it expresses. In all of this literature, the method of cases is used, where a situation is described in English, and then philosophers judge whether it is true that S knows that p, or whether saying "S knows that p" is false, deviant, etc. in that situation. However, English is just one of over 6000 languages spoken around the world, and is the native language of less than 6% of the world's population. When Western epistemology first emerged, in ancient Greece, English did not even exist. So why should we think that facts about the English word "know," the concept it expresses, or subtle semantic properties of "S knows that p" have important implications for epistemology? Are the properties of the English word "know" and the English sentence 'S knows that p' shared by their translations in most or all languages? If that turned out to be true, it would be a remarkable fact that cries out for an explanation. But if it turned out to be false, what are the implications for epistemology? Should epistemologists study knowledge attributions in languages other than English with the same diligence they have shown for the study of English knowledge attributions? If not, why not? In what ways do the concepts expressed by 'know' and its counterparts in different languages differ? And what should epistemologists make of all this? The papers collected here discuss these questions and related issues, and aim to contribute to this important topic and epistemology in general.

More books from Oxford University Press

Cover of the book We Gather Together by
Cover of the book From Baksheesh to Bribery by
Cover of the book Halal Food by
Cover of the book In Other Shoes by
Cover of the book The Divine Comedy by
Cover of the book The Indian Great Awakening by
Cover of the book Liberalism in Illiberal States by
Cover of the book Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD): Oxford Bibliographies Online Research Guide by
Cover of the book 50 Studies Every Intensivist Should Know by
Cover of the book Seven Steps to Managing Your Memory by
Cover of the book Cranford Level 4 Oxford Bookworms Library by
Cover of the book China In World History by
Cover of the book At Home in the Universe by
Cover of the book Sex Crimes: Oxford Bibliographies Online Research Guide by
Cover of the book The Comparative Approach to American History by
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy