Explanation in Ethics and Mathematics

Debunking and Dispensability

Nonfiction, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy, Logic, Science & Nature, Mathematics
Cover of the book Explanation in Ethics and Mathematics by , OUP Oxford
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: ISBN: 9780191084263
Publisher: OUP Oxford Publication: May 26, 2016
Imprint: OUP Oxford Language: English
Author:
ISBN: 9780191084263
Publisher: OUP Oxford
Publication: May 26, 2016
Imprint: OUP Oxford
Language: English

How far should our realism extend? For many years philosophers of mathematics and philosophers of ethics have worked independently to address the question of how best to understand the entities apparently referred to by mathematical and ethical talk. But the similarities between their endeavours are not often emphasised. This book provides that emphasis. In particular, it focuses on two types of argumentative strategies that have been deployed in both areas. The first—debunking arguments—aims to put pressure on realism by emphasising the seeming redundancy of mathematical or moral entities when it comes to explaining our judgements. In the moral realm this challenge has been made by Gilbert Harman and Sharon Street; in the mathematical realm it is known as the 'Benacerraf-Field' problem. The second strategy—indispensability arguments—aims to provide support for realism by emphasising the seeming intellectual indispensability of mathematical or moral entities, for example when constructing good explanatory theories. This strategy is associated with Quine and Putnam in mathematics and with Nicholas Sturgeon and David Enoch in ethics. Explanation in Ethics and Mathematics addresses these issues through an explicitly comparative methodology which we call the 'companions in illumination' approach. By considering how argumentative strategies in the philosophy of mathematics might apply to the philosophy of ethics, and vice versa, the papers collected here break new ground in both areas. For good measure, two further companions for illumination are also broached: the philosophy of chance and the philosophy of religion. Collectively, these comparisons light up new questions, arguments, and problems of interest to scholars interested in realism in any area.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

How far should our realism extend? For many years philosophers of mathematics and philosophers of ethics have worked independently to address the question of how best to understand the entities apparently referred to by mathematical and ethical talk. But the similarities between their endeavours are not often emphasised. This book provides that emphasis. In particular, it focuses on two types of argumentative strategies that have been deployed in both areas. The first—debunking arguments—aims to put pressure on realism by emphasising the seeming redundancy of mathematical or moral entities when it comes to explaining our judgements. In the moral realm this challenge has been made by Gilbert Harman and Sharon Street; in the mathematical realm it is known as the 'Benacerraf-Field' problem. The second strategy—indispensability arguments—aims to provide support for realism by emphasising the seeming intellectual indispensability of mathematical or moral entities, for example when constructing good explanatory theories. This strategy is associated with Quine and Putnam in mathematics and with Nicholas Sturgeon and David Enoch in ethics. Explanation in Ethics and Mathematics addresses these issues through an explicitly comparative methodology which we call the 'companions in illumination' approach. By considering how argumentative strategies in the philosophy of mathematics might apply to the philosophy of ethics, and vice versa, the papers collected here break new ground in both areas. For good measure, two further companions for illumination are also broached: the philosophy of chance and the philosophy of religion. Collectively, these comparisons light up new questions, arguments, and problems of interest to scholars interested in realism in any area.

More books from OUP Oxford

Cover of the book Participatory Research in Palliative Care by
Cover of the book Multicultural Odysseys : Navigating the New International Politics of Diversity by
Cover of the book Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, Volume 52 by
Cover of the book Nature's Robots by
Cover of the book Oxford Handbook of Clinical Diagnosis by
Cover of the book Molecules at an Exhibition by
Cover of the book Undergraduate Topology by
Cover of the book Early Modern Europe : An Oxford History by
Cover of the book Comparative Reasoning in European Supreme Courts by
Cover of the book The Enlightenment: A Very Short Introduction by
Cover of the book French Law by
Cover of the book Friedrich Max Müller and the Sacred Books of the East by
Cover of the book Thoracic Imaging by
Cover of the book International Law: A Very Short Introduction by
Cover of the book The Nineteenth Century by
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy