Gender Quotas and Democratic Participation

Recruiting Candidates for Elective Offices in Germany

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Social Science, Gender Studies, Political Science
Cover of the book Gender Quotas and Democratic Participation by Louise K Davidson-Schmich, University of Michigan Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Louise K Davidson-Schmich ISBN: 9780472121618
Publisher: University of Michigan Press Publication: March 8, 2016
Imprint: University of Michigan Press Language: English
Author: Louise K Davidson-Schmich
ISBN: 9780472121618
Publisher: University of Michigan Press
Publication: March 8, 2016
Imprint: University of Michigan Press
Language: English

Since the 1970s, quotas for female political candidates in elections have proliferated worldwide. Beyond increasing the numbers of women in high-level elected bodies and, thereby, women’s political representation, advocates claim that quotas foster gender-equal participation in democracy and create female role models. According to this reasoning, quotas also overcome barriers to women’s political participation, especially discriminatory practices in the selection of electoral candidates. Though such claims have persuaded policymakers to adopt quotas, little empirical evidence exists to verify their effects.

In Gender Quotas and Democratic Participation, Louise K. Davidson-Schmich employs a pathbreaking research design to assess the effects of gender quotas on all phases of political recruitment. Drawing on interviews with, and an original survey of, potential candidates in Germany, she investigates the extent to which quotas and corresponding increases in women’s descriptive representation have resulted in similar percentages of men and women joining political parties, aspiring to elected office, pursuing ballot nominations, and securing selection as candidates. She also examines the effect of quotas on discriminatory selection procedures.

Ultimately, Davidson-Schmich argues, quotas’ intended benefits have been only partially realized. Quotas give women greater presence in powerful elected bodies not by encouraging female citizens to pursue political office at rates similar to men’s, but by improving the odds that the limited number of politically ambitious women who do join parties will be elected. She concludes with concrete, original policy recommendations for increasing women’s political participation.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Since the 1970s, quotas for female political candidates in elections have proliferated worldwide. Beyond increasing the numbers of women in high-level elected bodies and, thereby, women’s political representation, advocates claim that quotas foster gender-equal participation in democracy and create female role models. According to this reasoning, quotas also overcome barriers to women’s political participation, especially discriminatory practices in the selection of electoral candidates. Though such claims have persuaded policymakers to adopt quotas, little empirical evidence exists to verify their effects.

In Gender Quotas and Democratic Participation, Louise K. Davidson-Schmich employs a pathbreaking research design to assess the effects of gender quotas on all phases of political recruitment. Drawing on interviews with, and an original survey of, potential candidates in Germany, she investigates the extent to which quotas and corresponding increases in women’s descriptive representation have resulted in similar percentages of men and women joining political parties, aspiring to elected office, pursuing ballot nominations, and securing selection as candidates. She also examines the effect of quotas on discriminatory selection procedures.

Ultimately, Davidson-Schmich argues, quotas’ intended benefits have been only partially realized. Quotas give women greater presence in powerful elected bodies not by encouraging female citizens to pursue political office at rates similar to men’s, but by improving the odds that the limited number of politically ambitious women who do join parties will be elected. She concludes with concrete, original policy recommendations for increasing women’s political participation.

More books from University of Michigan Press

Cover of the book Improper Influence by Louise K Davidson-Schmich
Cover of the book The Supreme Court on Trial by Louise K Davidson-Schmich
Cover of the book The Matter of Disability by Louise K Davidson-Schmich
Cover of the book The New Imperial Presidency by Louise K Davidson-Schmich
Cover of the book The Holocaust, Corporations, and the Law by Louise K Davidson-Schmich
Cover of the book The Phantom Respondents by Louise K Davidson-Schmich
Cover of the book Partisan Gerrymandering and the Construction of American Democracy by Louise K Davidson-Schmich
Cover of the book Angry Public Rhetorics by Louise K Davidson-Schmich
Cover of the book Reframing Screen Performance by Louise K Davidson-Schmich
Cover of the book The Possibility of Popular Justice by Louise K Davidson-Schmich
Cover of the book Staging Philanthropy by Louise K Davidson-Schmich
Cover of the book India China by Louise K Davidson-Schmich
Cover of the book The Birth of the Archive by Louise K Davidson-Schmich
Cover of the book Page to Stage by Louise K Davidson-Schmich
Cover of the book Ellery's Protest by Louise K Davidson-Schmich
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy