Genesis B and the Comedic Imperative

Fiction & Literature, Literary Theory & Criticism, Poetry History & Criticism, British, Poetry, British & Irish
Cover of the book Genesis B and the Comedic Imperative by John F. Vickrey, Lehigh University Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: John F. Vickrey ISBN: 9781611461688
Publisher: Lehigh University Press Publication: February 12, 2015
Imprint: Lehigh University Press Language: English
Author: John F. Vickrey
ISBN: 9781611461688
Publisher: Lehigh University Press
Publication: February 12, 2015
Imprint: Lehigh University Press
Language: English

Readers of Old English would generally agree that the poem Genesis B, a translation into Old English of an Old Saxon (that is, continental) retelling of the story of the Fall, is a vigorous and moving narrative. They would disagree, however, as to the meaning of the poem. Some hold that it reflects an orthodox Christian viewpoint and others claim that it assumes a distinctly unorthodox position in portraying Adam and Eve as not morally culpable in their disobedience but merely tricked into disobedience through the wiles of the Devil's agent. The study Genesis B and the Comedic Imperative, examining these incompatible readings, infers that the poem is essentially orthodox, that it demonstrates sufficiently the moral culpability of Adam and Eve, and that it departs from orthodoxy only insofar as it conveys a strong impression that Adam and Even will undertake what amounts to Christian penance, leading them eventually to Heaven. The poem thereby attains the happy ending typical of early medieval Christian narrative. Hence the titular "Comedic Imperative."

The inference of orthodoxy follows as a nigh-inevitable conclusion of the interpretation of several motifs: the poem's culturally imbued martiality, its allegorical bent, and also what A. N. Doane noted as its tropological bent. The argument depends heavily upon philological inquiry and on examination of prevailing beliefs and attitudes of contemporaneous Frankish society, religious and civil, leading to the reinterpretation of crucial passages. Of these, most notably, is the passage in which Adam, in refusing the Tempter's invitation to eat the fruit, observes that the Tempter has given no tacen ‘sign’ as evidence that he truly is God’s emissary. Other passages that have impeded critical perception of the poem's significance are also examined, such as the notorious micel wundor clause (lines 595-98) and the pseudo-gnomic declaration swa hire eaforan sculon after lybban (623-35). In sum, Genesis B sustains the orthodoxy otherwise of the Junius 11 manuscript.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Readers of Old English would generally agree that the poem Genesis B, a translation into Old English of an Old Saxon (that is, continental) retelling of the story of the Fall, is a vigorous and moving narrative. They would disagree, however, as to the meaning of the poem. Some hold that it reflects an orthodox Christian viewpoint and others claim that it assumes a distinctly unorthodox position in portraying Adam and Eve as not morally culpable in their disobedience but merely tricked into disobedience through the wiles of the Devil's agent. The study Genesis B and the Comedic Imperative, examining these incompatible readings, infers that the poem is essentially orthodox, that it demonstrates sufficiently the moral culpability of Adam and Eve, and that it departs from orthodoxy only insofar as it conveys a strong impression that Adam and Even will undertake what amounts to Christian penance, leading them eventually to Heaven. The poem thereby attains the happy ending typical of early medieval Christian narrative. Hence the titular "Comedic Imperative."

The inference of orthodoxy follows as a nigh-inevitable conclusion of the interpretation of several motifs: the poem's culturally imbued martiality, its allegorical bent, and also what A. N. Doane noted as its tropological bent. The argument depends heavily upon philological inquiry and on examination of prevailing beliefs and attitudes of contemporaneous Frankish society, religious and civil, leading to the reinterpretation of crucial passages. Of these, most notably, is the passage in which Adam, in refusing the Tempter's invitation to eat the fruit, observes that the Tempter has given no tacen ‘sign’ as evidence that he truly is God’s emissary. Other passages that have impeded critical perception of the poem's significance are also examined, such as the notorious micel wundor clause (lines 595-98) and the pseudo-gnomic declaration swa hire eaforan sculon after lybban (623-35). In sum, Genesis B sustains the orthodoxy otherwise of the Junius 11 manuscript.

More books from Lehigh University Press

Cover of the book America's First Chaplain by John F. Vickrey
Cover of the book Erie Railway Tourist, 1854–1886 by John F. Vickrey
Cover of the book Annotation in Eighteenth-Century Poetry by John F. Vickrey
Cover of the book The Ku Klux Klan in Western Pennsylvania, 1921–1928 by John F. Vickrey
Cover of the book Engendered Death by John F. Vickrey
Cover of the book Life on Muskrat Creek by John F. Vickrey
Cover of the book Clean Politics, Clean Streams by John F. Vickrey
Cover of the book The Publishing and Marketing of Illustrated Literature in Scotland, 1760–1825 by John F. Vickrey
Cover of the book Memorials of Harriet Martineau by Maria Weston Chapman by John F. Vickrey
Cover of the book The Steelworkers' Retirement Security System by John F. Vickrey
Cover of the book Adalberto Ortiz by John F. Vickrey
Cover of the book Harriet Martineau and the Irish Question by John F. Vickrey
Cover of the book John Updike's Pennsylvania Interviews by John F. Vickrey
Cover of the book Dead Masters by John F. Vickrey
Cover of the book Zen and the White Whale by John F. Vickrey
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy