Hamlet's Problematic Revenge

Forging a Royal Mandate

Nonfiction, Health & Well Being, Psychology, Developmental Psychology, Fiction & Literature, Literary Theory & Criticism, British
Cover of the book Hamlet's Problematic Revenge by William F. Zak, Lexington Books
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: William F. Zak ISBN: 9781498513111
Publisher: Lexington Books Publication: May 20, 2015
Imprint: Lexington Books Language: English
Author: William F. Zak
ISBN: 9781498513111
Publisher: Lexington Books
Publication: May 20, 2015
Imprint: Lexington Books
Language: English

Hamlet's Problematic Revenge: Forging a Royal Mandate provides a new argument within Shakespearean studies that argues the oft-noted arrest of the play’s dramaturgical momentum, especially evident in Hamlet’s much delayed enactment of his revenge, represents in fact a succinct emblem of the “arrested development” in the moral maturity of the entire cast, most notably, Hamlet himself—as the unifying disclosure and tragic problem in the play. Settling for unreflective and short-sighted personal gratifications and cold comforts, they truantly elbow aside a more considerable moral obligation. Again and again, all yield this duty’s commanding priority to a childishly self-regarding fear of offending those in nominal positions of power and questionable positions of authority—figures, like Ophelia and Hamlet’s fathers, for instance, demanding an unworthy deference.

While Hamlet fails to consider with loving regard the improved well-being of the larger community to which he owes his existence and, fails to interrogate the moral adequacy of the Ghost’s command of violent reprisal (two things he never does nor even contemplates doing), “all occasions” in the play “do inform against” him and merely “spur a dull revenge”—not, as he interprets his own words, arguing the need for greater urgency in his vendetta, but, instead, to “inform against” the criminality of that very course itself. His revenge therefore can be argued as “dull,” not because he cannot summon the wherewithal to enact it more bloodily, but because in obsessing about it ceaselessly he remains unreceptive to its “dull” or “unenlightened” opposition to the evil he hopes to eradicate. Hamlet does not avenge his father; this book argues that he becomes him. Amidst a wealth of previously unremarked figurative mirrorings, as well as much of the seemingly digressive material in Hamlet within Shakespearean studies, Hamlet’s Problematic Revenge brings to light a new interpretation of the tragic problem in the play.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Hamlet's Problematic Revenge: Forging a Royal Mandate provides a new argument within Shakespearean studies that argues the oft-noted arrest of the play’s dramaturgical momentum, especially evident in Hamlet’s much delayed enactment of his revenge, represents in fact a succinct emblem of the “arrested development” in the moral maturity of the entire cast, most notably, Hamlet himself—as the unifying disclosure and tragic problem in the play. Settling for unreflective and short-sighted personal gratifications and cold comforts, they truantly elbow aside a more considerable moral obligation. Again and again, all yield this duty’s commanding priority to a childishly self-regarding fear of offending those in nominal positions of power and questionable positions of authority—figures, like Ophelia and Hamlet’s fathers, for instance, demanding an unworthy deference.

While Hamlet fails to consider with loving regard the improved well-being of the larger community to which he owes his existence and, fails to interrogate the moral adequacy of the Ghost’s command of violent reprisal (two things he never does nor even contemplates doing), “all occasions” in the play “do inform against” him and merely “spur a dull revenge”—not, as he interprets his own words, arguing the need for greater urgency in his vendetta, but, instead, to “inform against” the criminality of that very course itself. His revenge therefore can be argued as “dull,” not because he cannot summon the wherewithal to enact it more bloodily, but because in obsessing about it ceaselessly he remains unreceptive to its “dull” or “unenlightened” opposition to the evil he hopes to eradicate. Hamlet does not avenge his father; this book argues that he becomes him. Amidst a wealth of previously unremarked figurative mirrorings, as well as much of the seemingly digressive material in Hamlet within Shakespearean studies, Hamlet’s Problematic Revenge brings to light a new interpretation of the tragic problem in the play.

More books from Lexington Books

Cover of the book Trinidad and Tobago and Guyana by William F. Zak
Cover of the book A Musician and Teacher in Nineteenth Century New England by William F. Zak
Cover of the book Filling the Hole in the Nuclear Future by William F. Zak
Cover of the book They Used to Call Us Witches by William F. Zak
Cover of the book Mead and Modernity by William F. Zak
Cover of the book Out of the Revolution by William F. Zak
Cover of the book Merleau-Ponty and Buddhism by William F. Zak
Cover of the book Against Authenticity by William F. Zak
Cover of the book Eisenhower at the Dawn of the Space Age by William F. Zak
Cover of the book Wittgenstein and Early Analytic Semantics by William F. Zak
Cover of the book A Short History of My Philosophy by William F. Zak
Cover of the book How Economics Professors Can Stop Failing Us by William F. Zak
Cover of the book American Democracy by William F. Zak
Cover of the book After Multiculturalism by William F. Zak
Cover of the book Voices of Exile in Contemporary Canadian Francophone Literature by William F. Zak
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy