Harvard Law Review: Volume 129, Number 3 - January 2016

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Administrative Law & Regulatory Practice, Jurisprudence
Cover of the book Harvard Law Review: Volume 129, Number 3 - January 2016 by Harvard Law Review, Quid Pro, LLC
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Harvard Law Review ISBN: 9781610278133
Publisher: Quid Pro, LLC Publication: January 8, 2016
Imprint: Smashwords Edition Language: English
Author: Harvard Law Review
ISBN: 9781610278133
Publisher: Quid Pro, LLC
Publication: January 8, 2016
Imprint: Smashwords Edition
Language: English

The January 2016 issue, Number 3, features these contents:

* Article, "Presidential Intelligence," by Samuel J. Rascoff
* Book Review, "The Struggle for Administrative Legitimacy," by Jeremy K. Kessler (on Daniel Ernst's new book about the administrative state)
* Note, "Existence-Value Standing"
* Note, "Rethinking Closely Regulated Industries"

In addition, student commentary analyzes Recent Cases on compelled disclosures in commercial speech; due process notice of procedures to challenge a local ordinance; standing after liquidation actions taken under Dodd-Frank; exaction and takings by acquiring equity shares in AIG; religious liberty after Hobby Lobby; bias-intimidation laws and mens rea; and whether document production is the 'practice of law' under labor law. The issue includes analysis of a Recent Court Filing by the DOJ supporting a meaningful juvenile right to counsel. Finally, the issue includes comments on Recent Publications.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

The January 2016 issue, Number 3, features these contents:

* Article, "Presidential Intelligence," by Samuel J. Rascoff
* Book Review, "The Struggle for Administrative Legitimacy," by Jeremy K. Kessler (on Daniel Ernst's new book about the administrative state)
* Note, "Existence-Value Standing"
* Note, "Rethinking Closely Regulated Industries"

In addition, student commentary analyzes Recent Cases on compelled disclosures in commercial speech; due process notice of procedures to challenge a local ordinance; standing after liquidation actions taken under Dodd-Frank; exaction and takings by acquiring equity shares in AIG; religious liberty after Hobby Lobby; bias-intimidation laws and mens rea; and whether document production is the 'practice of law' under labor law. The issue includes analysis of a Recent Court Filing by the DOJ supporting a meaningful juvenile right to counsel. Finally, the issue includes comments on Recent Publications.

More books from Quid Pro, LLC

Cover of the book The Enigma of Felix Frankfurter by Harvard Law Review
Cover of the book Harvard Law Review: Volume 130, Number 9 - Bicentennial Issue 2017 by Harvard Law Review
Cover of the book New England Law Review: Volume 48, Number 3 - Spring 2014 by Harvard Law Review
Cover of the book Harvard Law Review: Volume 131, Number 3 - January 2018 by Harvard Law Review
Cover of the book The Dramatic Concepts of Antonin Artaud by Harvard Law Review
Cover of the book Sociological Theory: A Contemporary View: How to Read, Criticize and Do Theory by Harvard Law Review
Cover of the book The Emerald Rose: A Courtroom Novel by Harvard Law Review
Cover of the book New Field, New Corn: Essays in Alabama Legal History by Harvard Law Review
Cover of the book Yale Law Journal: Volume 121, Number 2 - November 2011 by Harvard Law Review
Cover of the book Harvard Law Review: Volume 125, Number 6 - April 2012 by Harvard Law Review
Cover of the book Harvard Law Review: Volume 129, Number 2 - December 2015 by Harvard Law Review
Cover of the book Harvard Law Review: Volume 124, Number 8 - June 2011 by Harvard Law Review
Cover of the book The Convention on International Trade of Endangered Species: Local Authority and International Policy by Harvard Law Review
Cover of the book Hot Topics in the Legal Profession: 2017 by Harvard Law Review
Cover of the book Harvard Law Review: Volume 130, Number 4 - February 2017 by Harvard Law Review
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy