Human Rights and Human Well-Being

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, Politics, Civil Rights, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy, Political, Ethics & Moral Philosophy
Cover of the book Human Rights and Human Well-Being by William J. Talbott, Oxford University Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: William J. Talbott ISBN: 9780190623470
Publisher: Oxford University Press Publication: November 1, 2010
Imprint: Oxford University Press Language: English
Author: William J. Talbott
ISBN: 9780190623470
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Publication: November 1, 2010
Imprint: Oxford University Press
Language: English

In the last half of the twentieth century, legalized segregation ended in the southern United States, apartheid ended in South Africa, women in many parts of the world came to be recognized as having equal rights with men, persons with disabilities came to be recognized as having rights to develop and exercise their human capabilities, colonial peoples' rights of self-determination were recognized, and rights of gays and lesbians have begun to be recognized. It is hard not to see these developments as examples of real moral progress. But what is moral progress? In this book, William Talbott offers a surprising answer to that question. He proposes a consequentialist meta-theoretical principle of moral and legal progress, the "main principle", to explain why these changes are examples of moral and legal progress. On Talbott's account, improvements to our moral or legal practices are changes that, when evaluated as a practice, contribute to equitably promoting well-being. Talbott uses the main principle to explain why almost all the substantive moral norms and principles used in moral or legal reasoning have exceptions and why it is almost inevitable that, no matter how much we improve them, there will always be more exceptions. This explanation enables Talbott to propose a new, non-skeptical understanding of what has been called the "naturalistic fallacy". Talbott uses the main principle to complete the project begun in his 2005 book of identifying the human rights that should be universal-that is, legally guaranteed in all human societies. Talbott identifies a list of fourteen robust, inalienable human rights. Talbott contrasts his consequentialist (though not utilitarian) account with many of the most influential nonconsequentialist accounts of morality and justice in the philosophical literature, including those of Ronald Dworkin, Jurgen Habermas, Martha Nussbaum, Phillip Pettit, John Rawls, T.M. Scanlon, Amartya Sen, Judith Thomson.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

In the last half of the twentieth century, legalized segregation ended in the southern United States, apartheid ended in South Africa, women in many parts of the world came to be recognized as having equal rights with men, persons with disabilities came to be recognized as having rights to develop and exercise their human capabilities, colonial peoples' rights of self-determination were recognized, and rights of gays and lesbians have begun to be recognized. It is hard not to see these developments as examples of real moral progress. But what is moral progress? In this book, William Talbott offers a surprising answer to that question. He proposes a consequentialist meta-theoretical principle of moral and legal progress, the "main principle", to explain why these changes are examples of moral and legal progress. On Talbott's account, improvements to our moral or legal practices are changes that, when evaluated as a practice, contribute to equitably promoting well-being. Talbott uses the main principle to explain why almost all the substantive moral norms and principles used in moral or legal reasoning have exceptions and why it is almost inevitable that, no matter how much we improve them, there will always be more exceptions. This explanation enables Talbott to propose a new, non-skeptical understanding of what has been called the "naturalistic fallacy". Talbott uses the main principle to complete the project begun in his 2005 book of identifying the human rights that should be universal-that is, legally guaranteed in all human societies. Talbott identifies a list of fourteen robust, inalienable human rights. Talbott contrasts his consequentialist (though not utilitarian) account with many of the most influential nonconsequentialist accounts of morality and justice in the philosophical literature, including those of Ronald Dworkin, Jurgen Habermas, Martha Nussbaum, Phillip Pettit, John Rawls, T.M. Scanlon, Amartya Sen, Judith Thomson.

More books from Oxford University Press

Cover of the book Faith in Nation by William J. Talbott
Cover of the book The Records of Mazu and the Making of Classical Chan Literature by William J. Talbott
Cover of the book Making Education Work for the Poor by William J. Talbott
Cover of the book The Future of Religious Freedom by William J. Talbott
Cover of the book The Rise and Fall of the American Whig Party by William J. Talbott
Cover of the book Ethnicity and Human Rights in Canada by William J. Talbott
Cover of the book Constitutionalism, Human Rights, and Islam after the Arab Spring by William J. Talbott
Cover of the book William Harvey by William J. Talbott
Cover of the book Windows of Opportunity by William J. Talbott
Cover of the book Innovation Generation by William J. Talbott
Cover of the book The Vulnerability of Integrity in Early Confucian Thought by William J. Talbott
Cover of the book The Lion's Pride by William J. Talbott
Cover of the book Arrhythmias in Women by William J. Talbott
Cover of the book The System Worked by William J. Talbott
Cover of the book Buddhists, Hindus and Sikhs in America by William J. Talbott
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy