Journalists or Criminals? Attorney General Eric Holder's Testimony before the Committee and the Justice Department's National Security Leak Investigative Techniques

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science
Cover of the book Journalists or Criminals? Attorney General Eric Holder's Testimony before the Committee and the Justice Department's National Security Leak Investigative Techniques by Progressive Management, Progressive Management
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Progressive Management ISBN: 9781301935499
Publisher: Progressive Management Publication: August 4, 2013
Imprint: Smashwords Edition Language: English
Author: Progressive Management
ISBN: 9781301935499
Publisher: Progressive Management
Publication: August 4, 2013
Imprint: Smashwords Edition
Language: English

This is the majority Republican staff report to Chairman Bob Goodlatte of the House Committee on the Judiciary issued on July 31, 2013 about the controversy over Attorney General Eric Holder's testimony. The Executive Summary states:

The recent controversy surrounding Attorney General Eric Holder, Jr. and his testimony before the House Judiciary Committee is the result of deliberate efforts by Mr. Holder to avoid answering for questionable decisions and actions in the performance of his official duties. In particular, Mr. Holder's testimony was an attempt, through verbal gymnastics, to circumvent proper congressional oversight and accountability by distorting the truth about the Justice Department's investigative techniques targeting journalists.

Mr. Holder assured the Committee, in sworn testimony, that "[w]ith regard to potential prosecution of the press for the disclosure of material, that is not something that I have ever been involved, heard of, or would think would be a wise policy'" Yet, as the Committee learned after its May 15, 2013, hearing, in 2010, the Justice Department obtained a search warrant for Fox News Chief Washington Correspondent James Rosen's emails by swearing to a federal court that Mr. Rosen was a co-conspirator in a national security leak investigation. When questioned by the committee about the obvious clash between his testimony and the truth, Mr. Holder refused to answer questions from the Committee. Finally, after weeks of delay, Mr. Holder responded to the Committee's inquiry. However, Mr. Holder's responses do not ameliorate our concern that his testimony to the committee was deceptive and misleading. we take little comfort in Mr. Holder's assurances to us now that the Department never intended to prosecute Mr. Rosen when it labeled him a criminal suspect in 2010.

Tarnishing a journalist as a suspect in a national security investigation is not something that should be taken lightly. Espionage is a serious federal crime, punishable by up to a decade in prison. In essence, the Justice Department dangled Mr. Rosen over a cliff. But the American people were then assured by Mr. Holder that this was appropriate because there was never a potential of him falling to his doom.

In response to the nationwide disapproval of his tactics, Mr. Holder has proposed new rules and regulations to control the Justice Department's dealings with the media. While some of these proposals are welcome, the committee is dismayed that Mr. Holder suggests that congress change the law to stop him from continuing to do what he has done in the past - distort federal law to fit his investigative prerogatives. Mr. Holder proposes that congress amend the privacy Protection Act of 1980, a law intended to prohibit the government from searching a journalist's records unless the journalist is a criminal suspect. Mr. Holder maintains that the law contains a loophole that permits the government to do what it did in the Rosen case. But there is no such loophole. If Mr. Holder believes that the law should not permit the Justice Department to do what it did, he never should have authorized the search warrant in the first place. The committee believes that Mr. Holder is trying to deflect responsibility for his actions by presenting a distorted reading of the law. Changing the law is not the solution for misuse of the law.

The Committee finds that Mr. Holder's sworn testimony in the Rosen matter was deceptive and misleading. No amount of law-making can restore credibility and professionalism to the Justice Department in the wake of these revelations. The only way to achieve this goal is through an improvement in the quality of leadership at the Justice Department.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

This is the majority Republican staff report to Chairman Bob Goodlatte of the House Committee on the Judiciary issued on July 31, 2013 about the controversy over Attorney General Eric Holder's testimony. The Executive Summary states:

The recent controversy surrounding Attorney General Eric Holder, Jr. and his testimony before the House Judiciary Committee is the result of deliberate efforts by Mr. Holder to avoid answering for questionable decisions and actions in the performance of his official duties. In particular, Mr. Holder's testimony was an attempt, through verbal gymnastics, to circumvent proper congressional oversight and accountability by distorting the truth about the Justice Department's investigative techniques targeting journalists.

Mr. Holder assured the Committee, in sworn testimony, that "[w]ith regard to potential prosecution of the press for the disclosure of material, that is not something that I have ever been involved, heard of, or would think would be a wise policy'" Yet, as the Committee learned after its May 15, 2013, hearing, in 2010, the Justice Department obtained a search warrant for Fox News Chief Washington Correspondent James Rosen's emails by swearing to a federal court that Mr. Rosen was a co-conspirator in a national security leak investigation. When questioned by the committee about the obvious clash between his testimony and the truth, Mr. Holder refused to answer questions from the Committee. Finally, after weeks of delay, Mr. Holder responded to the Committee's inquiry. However, Mr. Holder's responses do not ameliorate our concern that his testimony to the committee was deceptive and misleading. we take little comfort in Mr. Holder's assurances to us now that the Department never intended to prosecute Mr. Rosen when it labeled him a criminal suspect in 2010.

Tarnishing a journalist as a suspect in a national security investigation is not something that should be taken lightly. Espionage is a serious federal crime, punishable by up to a decade in prison. In essence, the Justice Department dangled Mr. Rosen over a cliff. But the American people were then assured by Mr. Holder that this was appropriate because there was never a potential of him falling to his doom.

In response to the nationwide disapproval of his tactics, Mr. Holder has proposed new rules and regulations to control the Justice Department's dealings with the media. While some of these proposals are welcome, the committee is dismayed that Mr. Holder suggests that congress change the law to stop him from continuing to do what he has done in the past - distort federal law to fit his investigative prerogatives. Mr. Holder proposes that congress amend the privacy Protection Act of 1980, a law intended to prohibit the government from searching a journalist's records unless the journalist is a criminal suspect. Mr. Holder maintains that the law contains a loophole that permits the government to do what it did in the Rosen case. But there is no such loophole. If Mr. Holder believes that the law should not permit the Justice Department to do what it did, he never should have authorized the search warrant in the first place. The committee believes that Mr. Holder is trying to deflect responsibility for his actions by presenting a distorted reading of the law. Changing the law is not the solution for misuse of the law.

The Committee finds that Mr. Holder's sworn testimony in the Rosen matter was deceptive and misleading. No amount of law-making can restore credibility and professionalism to the Justice Department in the wake of these revelations. The only way to achieve this goal is through an improvement in the quality of leadership at the Justice Department.

More books from Progressive Management

Cover of the book Jihadi Discourse in the Wake of the Arab Spring: Islamic Militancy, Terrorism, Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Mubarak, Syria, ISIS, ISIL, Muslim Leaders, Salafis, Jihadism, Osama Bin Ladin by Progressive Management
Cover of the book North Korea in Perspective: Orientation Guide and North Korean Cultural Orientation: Geography, History, Economy, Security, Pyongyang, Goguryo, Silla Dynasty, Chosun, Kim Dynasty, Kim Jong Un, Yalu by Progressive Management
Cover of the book 21st Century U.S. Military Documents: Air Force B-52 Bomber - Operations Procedures, Aircrew Evaluation Criteria, Aircrew Training Flying Operations by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Explaining Meiji Japan's Top-Down Revolution (1868) - Reshaped Foreign Policy and Centralized Military by Conscripting Soldiers from Across the Country, Asserting Regionally with Korea by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Russia's Homegrown Insurgency: Jihad in the North Caucasus - Salafi Islamist Terrorism Challenge, Caucasus Emirate (CE), Chechen Insurgency, Putin Policy, Ethnic Circassian and Akhaz fighters by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Toward a Balanced View of Charismatic Leadership: Unique Scholarly Analysis of the Charisma of Army Leaders Through Classification of Speech, The Relationship with Followers by Progressive Management
Cover of the book NASA's Nuclear Frontier: The Plum Brook Reactor Facility - Research into Nuclear Propulsion for Rockets and Aircraft by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Cyber War: The Next Frontier for NATO - Distributed Denial of Service (DDOS) Website Internet Attacks, Hacktivists, Hackers, Cyber Attacks, Cyber Terrorism, Tallinn Manual, Possible Responses by Progressive Management
Cover of the book NASA's Space Shuttle Program: Shuttle Avionics Design Constraints and Considerations - Guide Book Based on KSC Engineering's Shuttle Turnaround Experience Lessons Learned by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Factors Shaping Japan's Foreign Policy Toward the Senkaku Islands: Chinese Encroachments and Domestic Japanese Politics, Leaders Koizumi, Abe, Ishihara and Noda, Constitution and International Law by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Chinese Cyber Warfare: China's Cyber Incursions, Strategic Method, Information Warfare Threat - Mandiant Report, Unit 61398, Henry Kissinger, Quantum Computing by Progressive Management
Cover of the book 21st Century Essential Guide to the Military Equipment of North Korea: Illustrated Guide to North Korean Weapons including Artillery, Tanks, Airplanes, Armored Vehicles, Helicopters, Ships by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Saudi Arabia: Modernity, Stability, and the Twenty-First Century Monarchy - Wahhabism, Saudi Political and Cultural History, Ibn Saud, Patronage State, Oil Economy, King Abdullah, Contemporary Reality by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Anti-Americanism: A Perfect Addition to a Russian Authoritarian's Political Toolbox - Vladimir Putin's History from the KGB to the Presidency, Corruption and Oligarchs, NATO, How Can America Cope? by Progressive Management
Cover of the book Art of War Paper: Survival Through Adaptation: The Chinese Red Army and the Extermination Campaigns, 1927-1936 - Late Qing to Early Republican China, Li Lisan Line, Bolsheviks by Progressive Management
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy