Judging Statutes

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Jurisprudence, Constitutional, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, Government, Public Policy
Cover of the book Judging Statutes by Robert A. Katzmann, Oxford University Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Robert A. Katzmann ISBN: 9780199362158
Publisher: Oxford University Press Publication: August 14, 2014
Imprint: Oxford University Press Language: English
Author: Robert A. Katzmann
ISBN: 9780199362158
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Publication: August 14, 2014
Imprint: Oxford University Press
Language: English

In an ideal world, the laws of Congress--known as federal statutes--would always be clearly worded and easily understood by the judges tasked with interpreting them. But many laws feature ambiguous or even contradictory wording. How, then, should judges divine their meaning? Should they stick only to the text? To what degree, if any, should they consult aids beyond the statutes themselves? Are the purposes of lawmakers in writing law relevant? Some judges, such as Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, believe courts should look to the language of the statute and virtually nothing else. Chief Judge Robert A. Katzmann of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit respectfully disagrees. In Judging Statutes, Katzmann, who is a trained political scientist as well as a judge, argues that our constitutional system charges Congress with enacting laws; therefore, how Congress makes its purposes known through both the laws themselves and reliable accompanying materials should be respected. He looks at how the American government works, including how laws come to be and how various agencies construe legislation. He then explains the judicial process of interpreting and applying these laws through the demonstration of two interpretative approaches, purposivism (focusing on the purpose of a law) and textualism (focusing solely on the text of the written law). Katzmann draws from his experience to show how this process plays out in the real world, and concludes with some suggestions to promote understanding between the courts and Congress. When courts interpret the laws of Congress, they should be mindful of how Congress actually functions, how lawmakers signal the meaning of statutes, and what those legislators expect of courts construing their laws. The legislative record behind a law is in truth part of its foundation, and therefore merits consideration.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

In an ideal world, the laws of Congress--known as federal statutes--would always be clearly worded and easily understood by the judges tasked with interpreting them. But many laws feature ambiguous or even contradictory wording. How, then, should judges divine their meaning? Should they stick only to the text? To what degree, if any, should they consult aids beyond the statutes themselves? Are the purposes of lawmakers in writing law relevant? Some judges, such as Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, believe courts should look to the language of the statute and virtually nothing else. Chief Judge Robert A. Katzmann of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit respectfully disagrees. In Judging Statutes, Katzmann, who is a trained political scientist as well as a judge, argues that our constitutional system charges Congress with enacting laws; therefore, how Congress makes its purposes known through both the laws themselves and reliable accompanying materials should be respected. He looks at how the American government works, including how laws come to be and how various agencies construe legislation. He then explains the judicial process of interpreting and applying these laws through the demonstration of two interpretative approaches, purposivism (focusing on the purpose of a law) and textualism (focusing solely on the text of the written law). Katzmann draws from his experience to show how this process plays out in the real world, and concludes with some suggestions to promote understanding between the courts and Congress. When courts interpret the laws of Congress, they should be mindful of how Congress actually functions, how lawmakers signal the meaning of statutes, and what those legislators expect of courts construing their laws. The legislative record behind a law is in truth part of its foundation, and therefore merits consideration.

More books from Oxford University Press

Cover of the book Korea under Siege, 1876-1945 by Robert A. Katzmann
Cover of the book The Myth of International Order by Robert A. Katzmann
Cover of the book The History of Neuroscience in Autobiography Volume 6 by Robert A. Katzmann
Cover of the book Ludwig Wittgenstein: Early Works: Oxford Bibliographies Online Research Guide by Robert A. Katzmann
Cover of the book Building Trust by Robert A. Katzmann
Cover of the book Free Will and Luck by Robert A. Katzmann
Cover of the book Rhythms of the Brain by Robert A. Katzmann
Cover of the book Chinese Comfort Women by Robert A. Katzmann
Cover of the book The Epistemology of A Priori Knowledge by Robert A. Katzmann
Cover of the book Cross-Curricular Activities - Oxford Basics by Robert A. Katzmann
Cover of the book Christians and the Color Line by Robert A. Katzmann
Cover of the book The Global Lincoln by Robert A. Katzmann
Cover of the book China In World History by Robert A. Katzmann
Cover of the book The Magic Lantern by Robert A. Katzmann
Cover of the book Empire of Ideas by Robert A. Katzmann
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy