Just War or Just Peace?

Humanitarian Intervention and International Law

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, International, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science
Cover of the book Just War or Just Peace? by Simon Chesterman, OUP Oxford
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Simon Chesterman ISBN: 9780191021817
Publisher: OUP Oxford Publication: January 25, 2001
Imprint: OUP Oxford Language: English
Author: Simon Chesterman
ISBN: 9780191021817
Publisher: OUP Oxford
Publication: January 25, 2001
Imprint: OUP Oxford
Language: English

The question of the legality of humanitarian intervention is, at first blush, a simple one. The Charter of the United Nations clearly prohibits the use of force, with the only exceptions being self-defence and enforcement actions authorized by the Security Council. There are, however, long-standing arguments that a right of unilateral intervention pre-existed the Charter. This book, which won the ASIL Certificate of Merit in 2002, begins with an examination of the genealogy of that right, and arguments that it might have survived the passage of the Charter, either through a loophole in Article 2(4) or as part of customary international law. It has also been argued that certain `illegitimate' regimes lose the attributes of sovereignty and thereby the protection given by the prohibition of the use of force. None of these arguments is found to have merit, either in principle or in the practice of states. A common justification for a right of unilateral humanitarian intervention concerns the failure of the collective security mechanism created after the Second World War. Chapters 4 and 5, therefore, examine Security Council activism in the 1990s, notable for the plasticity of the circumstances in which the Council was prepared to assert its primary responsibility for international peace and security, and the contingency of its actions on the willingness of states to carry them out. This reduction of the Council's role from substantive to formal partly explains the recourse to unilateralism in that decade, most spectacularly in relation to the situation in Kosovo. Crucially, the book argues that such unilateral enforcement is not a substitute for but the opposite of collective action. Though often presented as the only alternative to inaction, incorporating a `right' of intervention would lead to more such interventions being undertaken in bad faith, it would be incoherent as a principle, and it would be inimical to the emergence of an international rule of law.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

The question of the legality of humanitarian intervention is, at first blush, a simple one. The Charter of the United Nations clearly prohibits the use of force, with the only exceptions being self-defence and enforcement actions authorized by the Security Council. There are, however, long-standing arguments that a right of unilateral intervention pre-existed the Charter. This book, which won the ASIL Certificate of Merit in 2002, begins with an examination of the genealogy of that right, and arguments that it might have survived the passage of the Charter, either through a loophole in Article 2(4) or as part of customary international law. It has also been argued that certain `illegitimate' regimes lose the attributes of sovereignty and thereby the protection given by the prohibition of the use of force. None of these arguments is found to have merit, either in principle or in the practice of states. A common justification for a right of unilateral humanitarian intervention concerns the failure of the collective security mechanism created after the Second World War. Chapters 4 and 5, therefore, examine Security Council activism in the 1990s, notable for the plasticity of the circumstances in which the Council was prepared to assert its primary responsibility for international peace and security, and the contingency of its actions on the willingness of states to carry them out. This reduction of the Council's role from substantive to formal partly explains the recourse to unilateralism in that decade, most spectacularly in relation to the situation in Kosovo. Crucially, the book argues that such unilateral enforcement is not a substitute for but the opposite of collective action. Though often presented as the only alternative to inaction, incorporating a `right' of intervention would lead to more such interventions being undertaken in bad faith, it would be incoherent as a principle, and it would be inimical to the emergence of an international rule of law.

More books from OUP Oxford

Cover of the book Egyptian Myth: A Very Short Introduction by Simon Chesterman
Cover of the book Blackstone's Criminal Practice 2012 (book only) by Simon Chesterman
Cover of the book St Theodore the Studite's Defence of the Icons by Simon Chesterman
Cover of the book A Practical Approach to Planning Law by Simon Chesterman
Cover of the book Diaries Real and Fictional in Twentieth-Century French Writing by Simon Chesterman
Cover of the book The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems by Simon Chesterman
Cover of the book Annuity Markets by Simon Chesterman
Cover of the book Woodrow Wilson by Simon Chesterman
Cover of the book Applications to Wind Up Companies by Simon Chesterman
Cover of the book Being Good: A Short Introduction to Ethics by Simon Chesterman
Cover of the book Nuclear Power: A Very Short Introduction by Simon Chesterman
Cover of the book The European Convention on Human Rights by Simon Chesterman
Cover of the book The Zinoviev Letter by Simon Chesterman
Cover of the book The Chemical Weapons Convention by Simon Chesterman
Cover of the book The IMF and the Politics of Austerity in the Wake of the Global Financial Crisis by Simon Chesterman
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy