Just War or Just Peace?

Humanitarian Intervention and International Law

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, International, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science
Cover of the book Just War or Just Peace? by Simon Chesterman, OUP Oxford
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Simon Chesterman ISBN: 9780191021817
Publisher: OUP Oxford Publication: January 25, 2001
Imprint: OUP Oxford Language: English
Author: Simon Chesterman
ISBN: 9780191021817
Publisher: OUP Oxford
Publication: January 25, 2001
Imprint: OUP Oxford
Language: English

The question of the legality of humanitarian intervention is, at first blush, a simple one. The Charter of the United Nations clearly prohibits the use of force, with the only exceptions being self-defence and enforcement actions authorized by the Security Council. There are, however, long-standing arguments that a right of unilateral intervention pre-existed the Charter. This book, which won the ASIL Certificate of Merit in 2002, begins with an examination of the genealogy of that right, and arguments that it might have survived the passage of the Charter, either through a loophole in Article 2(4) or as part of customary international law. It has also been argued that certain `illegitimate' regimes lose the attributes of sovereignty and thereby the protection given by the prohibition of the use of force. None of these arguments is found to have merit, either in principle or in the practice of states. A common justification for a right of unilateral humanitarian intervention concerns the failure of the collective security mechanism created after the Second World War. Chapters 4 and 5, therefore, examine Security Council activism in the 1990s, notable for the plasticity of the circumstances in which the Council was prepared to assert its primary responsibility for international peace and security, and the contingency of its actions on the willingness of states to carry them out. This reduction of the Council's role from substantive to formal partly explains the recourse to unilateralism in that decade, most spectacularly in relation to the situation in Kosovo. Crucially, the book argues that such unilateral enforcement is not a substitute for but the opposite of collective action. Though often presented as the only alternative to inaction, incorporating a `right' of intervention would lead to more such interventions being undertaken in bad faith, it would be incoherent as a principle, and it would be inimical to the emergence of an international rule of law.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

The question of the legality of humanitarian intervention is, at first blush, a simple one. The Charter of the United Nations clearly prohibits the use of force, with the only exceptions being self-defence and enforcement actions authorized by the Security Council. There are, however, long-standing arguments that a right of unilateral intervention pre-existed the Charter. This book, which won the ASIL Certificate of Merit in 2002, begins with an examination of the genealogy of that right, and arguments that it might have survived the passage of the Charter, either through a loophole in Article 2(4) or as part of customary international law. It has also been argued that certain `illegitimate' regimes lose the attributes of sovereignty and thereby the protection given by the prohibition of the use of force. None of these arguments is found to have merit, either in principle or in the practice of states. A common justification for a right of unilateral humanitarian intervention concerns the failure of the collective security mechanism created after the Second World War. Chapters 4 and 5, therefore, examine Security Council activism in the 1990s, notable for the plasticity of the circumstances in which the Council was prepared to assert its primary responsibility for international peace and security, and the contingency of its actions on the willingness of states to carry them out. This reduction of the Council's role from substantive to formal partly explains the recourse to unilateralism in that decade, most spectacularly in relation to the situation in Kosovo. Crucially, the book argues that such unilateral enforcement is not a substitute for but the opposite of collective action. Though often presented as the only alternative to inaction, incorporating a `right' of intervention would lead to more such interventions being undertaken in bad faith, it would be incoherent as a principle, and it would be inimical to the emergence of an international rule of law.

More books from OUP Oxford

Cover of the book A Case of Hysteria by Simon Chesterman
Cover of the book The Wreck of Catalonia by Simon Chesterman
Cover of the book Middlemarch by Simon Chesterman
Cover of the book Music in Our Lives by Simon Chesterman
Cover of the book Company Directors by Simon Chesterman
Cover of the book The Oxford Handbook of Generality in Mathematics and the Sciences by Simon Chesterman
Cover of the book The British Constitution: A Very Short Introduction by Simon Chesterman
Cover of the book Mental Actions by Simon Chesterman
Cover of the book A Gentle Creature and Other Stories by Simon Chesterman
Cover of the book Disability and Isaiah's Suffering Servant by Simon Chesterman
Cover of the book Mistake and Non-Disclosure of Fact by Simon Chesterman
Cover of the book Blackstone's Custody Officers' Manual by Simon Chesterman
Cover of the book Crossroads in the Black Aegean by Simon Chesterman
Cover of the book Interpreting the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty by Simon Chesterman
Cover of the book Understanding Other Minds by Simon Chesterman
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy