Kepler Newton and Einstein

Nonfiction, Science & Nature, Science, Physics, Gravity
Cover of the book Kepler Newton and Einstein by James Constant, James Constant
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: James Constant ISBN: 9781370115457
Publisher: James Constant Publication: June 20, 2017
Imprint: Smashwords Edition Language: English
Author: James Constant
ISBN: 9781370115457
Publisher: James Constant
Publication: June 20, 2017
Imprint: Smashwords Edition
Language: English

How well do Newton’s and Einstein’s theories explain Kepler’s observations of planetary orbits? Do Newton’s laws of motion apply in Newton’s gravitation? Are Kepler’s Newton’s and Einstein’s laws universal? Does Einstein's theory replace Newton's theory?
Newton’s laws of motion and gravitation admit fictional centrifugal forces in angular motions and, with such fictional forces, Newton’s law of gravitation acting radially predicts all types of conical orbits including Kepler’s laws. The idea that Newton’s laws admit fictional centrifugal forces has a significant impact on all theories in cosmology which obtain information from radial measurements. For the most part, they connect Newton’s radial theory to Kepler’s conical orbits. Consider, for example, the bending of light, red shift and precession of perihelia observations. These are the classical observations. In all these classical cases, Newton’s fictional centrifugal forces predict Kepler’s conical planetary and galactic orbits. Most planets and galaxies are observed in almost circular orbits. However, beyond the galactic system, the existence of Kepler’s and Newton’s laws remains open.
The adoption of Einstein’s theory destroys Newton’s theory because Newton’s law of gravitation force F so abundantly confirmed would increase by a factor 2 making it unconformable in practice. Redshift predictions would increase by a factor 2 and orbital periods would decrease by a factor about 30% making Einstein’s predictions unconformable. Einstein's theory does not replace Newton's theory.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

How well do Newton’s and Einstein’s theories explain Kepler’s observations of planetary orbits? Do Newton’s laws of motion apply in Newton’s gravitation? Are Kepler’s Newton’s and Einstein’s laws universal? Does Einstein's theory replace Newton's theory?
Newton’s laws of motion and gravitation admit fictional centrifugal forces in angular motions and, with such fictional forces, Newton’s law of gravitation acting radially predicts all types of conical orbits including Kepler’s laws. The idea that Newton’s laws admit fictional centrifugal forces has a significant impact on all theories in cosmology which obtain information from radial measurements. For the most part, they connect Newton’s radial theory to Kepler’s conical orbits. Consider, for example, the bending of light, red shift and precession of perihelia observations. These are the classical observations. In all these classical cases, Newton’s fictional centrifugal forces predict Kepler’s conical planetary and galactic orbits. Most planets and galaxies are observed in almost circular orbits. However, beyond the galactic system, the existence of Kepler’s and Newton’s laws remains open.
The adoption of Einstein’s theory destroys Newton’s theory because Newton’s law of gravitation force F so abundantly confirmed would increase by a factor 2 making it unconformable in practice. Redshift predictions would increase by a factor 2 and orbital periods would decrease by a factor about 30% making Einstein’s predictions unconformable. Einstein's theory does not replace Newton's theory.

More books from James Constant

Cover of the book Petition for Certiorari Denied Without Opinion: Patent Case 93-1518 by James Constant
Cover of the book Character of the State by James Constant
Cover of the book Petition for Certiorari Denied Without Opinion: Patent Case 96-1178 by James Constant
Cover of the book Malthus Revisited by James Constant
Cover of the book Le Verrier's and Einstein's Predictions for Precession of Perihelia by James Constant
Cover of the book History and Law by James Constant
Cover of the book Petition for Certiorari – Patent Case 94-782 - Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(h)(3) - Patent Statute 35 USC 261 – Judgment lien Statute 12 USC 1963 by James Constant
Cover of the book Cosmic Expansion Slowdown Speedup and the Big Bang Theory by James Constant
Cover of the book European Elites And Debt Crisis by James Constant
Cover of the book Petition for Certiorari Denied Without Opinion: Patent Case 88-308 by James Constant
Cover of the book List of Patents Confiscated Illegally Under California State Laws by James Constant
Cover of the book Redshift and Speed of Light by James Constant
Cover of the book We The People Demand Accountability by James Constant
Cover of the book Fictional Gravitational Forces by James Constant
Cover of the book Federal Courts Crush Inventors by James Constant
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy