Kings and Usurpers in the Seleukid Empire

The Men who would be King

Nonfiction, History, Ancient History, Greece
Cover of the book Kings and Usurpers in the Seleukid Empire by Boris Chrubasik, OUP Oxford
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Boris Chrubasik ISBN: 9780191090615
Publisher: OUP Oxford Publication: October 20, 2016
Imprint: OUP Oxford Language: English
Author: Boris Chrubasik
ISBN: 9780191090615
Publisher: OUP Oxford
Publication: October 20, 2016
Imprint: OUP Oxford
Language: English

Kings and Usurpers in the Seleukid Empire: The Men who would be King focuses on ideas of kingship and power in the Seleukid empire, the largest of the successor states of Alexander the Great. Exploring the question of how a man becomes a king, it specifically examines the role of usurpers in this particular kingdom - those who attempted to become king, and who were labelled as rebels by ancient authors after their demise - by placing these individuals in their appropriate historical contexts through careful analysis of the literary, numismatic, and epigraphic material. By writing about kings and rebels, literary accounts make a clear statement about who had the right to rule and who did not, and the Seleukid kings actively fostered their own images of this right throughout the third and second centuries BCE. However, what emerges from the documentary evidence is a revelatory picture of a political landscape in which kings and those who would be kings were in constant competition to persuade whole cities and armies that they were the only plausible monarch, and of a right to rule that, advanced and refuted on so many sides, simply did not exist. Through careful analysis, this volume advances a new political history of the Seleukid empire that is predicated on social power, redefining the role of the king as only one of several players within the social world and offering new approaches to the interpretation of the relationship between these individuals themselves and with the empire they sought to rule. In doing so, it both questions the current consensus on the Seleukid state, arguing instead that despite its many strong rulers the empire was structurally weak, and offers a new approach to writing political history of the ancient world.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Kings and Usurpers in the Seleukid Empire: The Men who would be King focuses on ideas of kingship and power in the Seleukid empire, the largest of the successor states of Alexander the Great. Exploring the question of how a man becomes a king, it specifically examines the role of usurpers in this particular kingdom - those who attempted to become king, and who were labelled as rebels by ancient authors after their demise - by placing these individuals in their appropriate historical contexts through careful analysis of the literary, numismatic, and epigraphic material. By writing about kings and rebels, literary accounts make a clear statement about who had the right to rule and who did not, and the Seleukid kings actively fostered their own images of this right throughout the third and second centuries BCE. However, what emerges from the documentary evidence is a revelatory picture of a political landscape in which kings and those who would be kings were in constant competition to persuade whole cities and armies that they were the only plausible monarch, and of a right to rule that, advanced and refuted on so many sides, simply did not exist. Through careful analysis, this volume advances a new political history of the Seleukid empire that is predicated on social power, redefining the role of the king as only one of several players within the social world and offering new approaches to the interpretation of the relationship between these individuals themselves and with the empire they sought to rule. In doing so, it both questions the current consensus on the Seleukid state, arguing instead that despite its many strong rulers the empire was structurally weak, and offers a new approach to writing political history of the ancient world.

More books from OUP Oxford

Cover of the book Employment Law Concentrate by Boris Chrubasik
Cover of the book Lost in Dialogue by Boris Chrubasik
Cover of the book Fundamental Rights in Europe by Boris Chrubasik
Cover of the book Closing the Gap by Boris Chrubasik
Cover of the book Where Our Protection Lies by Boris Chrubasik
Cover of the book From Taverns to Gastropubs by Boris Chrubasik
Cover of the book Deuteronomy 28 and the Aramaic Curse Tradition by Boris Chrubasik
Cover of the book Aurora Leigh by Boris Chrubasik
Cover of the book A Supernatural War by Boris Chrubasik
Cover of the book Blackstone's Police Operational Handbook 2012: Law by Boris Chrubasik
Cover of the book Beyond the People by Boris Chrubasik
Cover of the book Postcolonialism: A Very Short Introduction by Boris Chrubasik
Cover of the book The Liberation of Jerusalem by Boris Chrubasik
Cover of the book Virtue and Law in Plato and Beyond by Boris Chrubasik
Cover of the book Extralegal Groups in Post-Conflict Liberia by Boris Chrubasik
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy