Labour standards and the WTO: Counter-hegemonic struggle against Neoliberalism?

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science
Cover of the book Labour standards and the WTO: Counter-hegemonic struggle against Neoliberalism? by Claudia Laubstein, GRIN Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Claudia Laubstein ISBN: 9783638319799
Publisher: GRIN Publishing Publication: October 28, 2004
Imprint: GRIN Publishing Language: English
Author: Claudia Laubstein
ISBN: 9783638319799
Publisher: GRIN Publishing
Publication: October 28, 2004
Imprint: GRIN Publishing
Language: English

Seminar paper from the year 2004 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: Globalization, Political Economics, grade: 1,3 (A), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (Political Science), course: International Financial Institutions: Friend or Foe?, 18 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: This paper tries to determine causes for the only limited impact of labor movement. First, I will outline the neo-Gramscian approach to International Political Economy with its central concepts of hegemony and counter-hegemony. From a neo-Gramscian perspective, the labor movement is regarded as a counterhegemonic project which tries to change the hegemonic institution WTO to its advantage. I will show that the need for a social clause arose from tensions within the neoliberal order. In the analysis, the focus will be on the thesis that the labor movement itself is too divided and therefore does not represent a uniform strategy which would be necessary for the building of counter-hegemony. More particularly, a deep division runs between North and South. I will set up the thesis that the perception of an antagonism between Northern and Southern interests is further fueled by nationalist populist movements in developed countries, which themselves have their origins the neoliberal mode of production. The Singapore Ministerial Conference of the WTO in 1996 is the background for discussion because the introduction of labor issues rejected then and further attempts to revive the debate have not led to other results yet1. The dominance of neoliberalism and the social forces of capital will be overviewed in short because they benefit from the current absence of labor standards and therefore oppose the counter-hegemonic movement. The results will be summarized in the conclusion chapter.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Seminar paper from the year 2004 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: Globalization, Political Economics, grade: 1,3 (A), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (Political Science), course: International Financial Institutions: Friend or Foe?, 18 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: This paper tries to determine causes for the only limited impact of labor movement. First, I will outline the neo-Gramscian approach to International Political Economy with its central concepts of hegemony and counter-hegemony. From a neo-Gramscian perspective, the labor movement is regarded as a counterhegemonic project which tries to change the hegemonic institution WTO to its advantage. I will show that the need for a social clause arose from tensions within the neoliberal order. In the analysis, the focus will be on the thesis that the labor movement itself is too divided and therefore does not represent a uniform strategy which would be necessary for the building of counter-hegemony. More particularly, a deep division runs between North and South. I will set up the thesis that the perception of an antagonism between Northern and Southern interests is further fueled by nationalist populist movements in developed countries, which themselves have their origins the neoliberal mode of production. The Singapore Ministerial Conference of the WTO in 1996 is the background for discussion because the introduction of labor issues rejected then and further attempts to revive the debate have not led to other results yet1. The dominance of neoliberalism and the social forces of capital will be overviewed in short because they benefit from the current absence of labor standards and therefore oppose the counter-hegemonic movement. The results will be summarized in the conclusion chapter.

More books from GRIN Publishing

Cover of the book Are we all modern Robinsons? by Claudia Laubstein
Cover of the book Issues of Sexuality in 'Bram Stoker's Dracula' by Claudia Laubstein
Cover of the book An Alternative Muslim Emancipation. Monica Ali's 'Brick Lane' (2003) by Claudia Laubstein
Cover of the book Colonialism and Neo-Colonialism by Claudia Laubstein
Cover of the book Business Report. Global Aircraft Manufacturing Industry by Claudia Laubstein
Cover of the book Eliminating Drug Addiction: The Ways of Solving the Social Problem in Early Soviet Medical Texts by Claudia Laubstein
Cover of the book Governance and Development by Claudia Laubstein
Cover of the book The Lemon. The History and Effects of this Citrus Fruit by Claudia Laubstein
Cover of the book Toward a Russian market economy by Claudia Laubstein
Cover of the book The presentation of a hybrid identity in Fred Wah´s 'Diamond Grill': Food and habitation as ethnic markers and Chinese Canadians by Claudia Laubstein
Cover of the book Immigration Policy in Canada by Claudia Laubstein
Cover of the book From 'counterrevolution' to 'revolution' to collapse by Claudia Laubstein
Cover of the book Development projects in Northern India by Claudia Laubstein
Cover of the book Immigration and the policy of language by Claudia Laubstein
Cover of the book IBM - deploying development activity in non-US-countries? by Claudia Laubstein
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy