Language Learning

A Special Case for Developmental Psychology?

Nonfiction, Health & Well Being, Psychology, Child & Adolescent, Child Development
Cover of the book Language Learning by Christine J. Howe, Taylor and Francis
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Christine J. Howe ISBN: 9781351662581
Publisher: Taylor and Francis Publication: December 6, 2017
Imprint: Routledge Language: English
Author: Christine J. Howe
ISBN: 9781351662581
Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Publication: December 6, 2017
Imprint: Routledge
Language: English

Originally published in 1993, the starting place for this book is the notion, current in the literature for around 30 years at that time, that children could not learn their native language without substantial innate knowledge of its grammatical structure. It is argued that the notion is as problematic for contemporary theories of development as it was for theories of the past. Accepting this, the book attempts an in-depth study of the notions credibility.

Central to the book’s argument is the conclusion that the innateness hypothesis runs into two major problems. Firstly, its proponents are too ready to treat children as embryonic linguists, concerned with the representation of sentences as an end in itself. A more realistic approach would be to regard children as communication engineers, storing sentences to optimize the production and retrieval of meaning. Secondly, even when the communication analogy is adopted, it is glibly assumed that the meanings children impute will be the ones adults intend. One of the book’s major contentions is that a careful reading of contemporary research suggests that the meanings may differ considerably.

Identifying such problems, the book considers how development should proceed, given learning along communication lines and a more plausible analysis of meaning. It makes detailed predictions about what would be anticipated given no innate knowledge of grammar. Focusing on English but giving full acknowledgement to cross-linguistic research, it concludes that the predictions are consistent with both the known timescale of learning and the established facts about children’s knowledge. Thus the book aspires to a serious challenge to the innateness hypothesis via, as its final chapter will argue, a model which is much more reassuring to psychological theory.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Originally published in 1993, the starting place for this book is the notion, current in the literature for around 30 years at that time, that children could not learn their native language without substantial innate knowledge of its grammatical structure. It is argued that the notion is as problematic for contemporary theories of development as it was for theories of the past. Accepting this, the book attempts an in-depth study of the notions credibility.

Central to the book’s argument is the conclusion that the innateness hypothesis runs into two major problems. Firstly, its proponents are too ready to treat children as embryonic linguists, concerned with the representation of sentences as an end in itself. A more realistic approach would be to regard children as communication engineers, storing sentences to optimize the production and retrieval of meaning. Secondly, even when the communication analogy is adopted, it is glibly assumed that the meanings children impute will be the ones adults intend. One of the book’s major contentions is that a careful reading of contemporary research suggests that the meanings may differ considerably.

Identifying such problems, the book considers how development should proceed, given learning along communication lines and a more plausible analysis of meaning. It makes detailed predictions about what would be anticipated given no innate knowledge of grammar. Focusing on English but giving full acknowledgement to cross-linguistic research, it concludes that the predictions are consistent with both the known timescale of learning and the established facts about children’s knowledge. Thus the book aspires to a serious challenge to the innateness hypothesis via, as its final chapter will argue, a model which is much more reassuring to psychological theory.

More books from Taylor and Francis

Cover of the book The Other Sylvia Plath by Christine J. Howe
Cover of the book Memoirs of Peter Henry Bruce, Esq., a Military Officer in the Services of Prussia, Russia & Great Britain, Containing an Account of His Travels in Germany, Russia, Tartary, Turkey, the West Indies Etc by Christine J. Howe
Cover of the book The Development and Principles of International Humanitarian Law by Christine J. Howe
Cover of the book The Emergence of a Modern City by Christine J. Howe
Cover of the book The Bureaucratic Phenomenon by Christine J. Howe
Cover of the book Lesbian Utopics by Christine J. Howe
Cover of the book A History of Econometrics in France by Christine J. Howe
Cover of the book Political Theorists in Context by Christine J. Howe
Cover of the book The Routledge International Handbook to Welfare State Systems by Christine J. Howe
Cover of the book Music in Canada by Christine J. Howe
Cover of the book The Three Romes by Christine J. Howe
Cover of the book Ancient Greek Agriculture by Christine J. Howe
Cover of the book Exploring Positive Identities and Organizations by Christine J. Howe
Cover of the book Political Ideologies and the Democratic Ideal by Christine J. Howe
Cover of the book Cluster Development and Policy by Christine J. Howe
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy