Leaving without Losing

The War on Terror after Iraq and Afghanistan

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, International, International Relations, History
Cover of the book Leaving without Losing by Mark N. Katz, Johns Hopkins University Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Mark N. Katz ISBN: 9781421405889
Publisher: Johns Hopkins University Press Publication: April 16, 2012
Imprint: Language: English
Author: Mark N. Katz
ISBN: 9781421405889
Publisher: Johns Hopkins University Press
Publication: April 16, 2012
Imprint:
Language: English

As the United States withdraws its combat troops from Iraq and Afghanistan, politicians, foreign policy specialists, and the public are worrying about the consequences of leaving these two countries. Neither nation can be considered stable, and progress toward democracy in them—a principal aim of America and the West—is fragile at best. But, international relations scholar Mark N. Katz asks: Could ending both wars actually help the United States and its allies to overcome radical Islam in the long term?

Drawing lessons from the Cold War, Katz makes the case that rather than signaling the decline of American power and influence, removing military forces from Afghanistan and Iraq puts the U.S. in a better position to counter the forces of radical Islam and ultimately win the war on terror. He explains that since both wars will likely remain intractable, for Washington to remain heavily involved in either is counter-productive. Katz argues that looking to its Cold War experience would help the U.S. find better strategies for employing America’s scarce resources to deal with its adversaries now. This means that, although leaving Afghanistan and Iraq may well appear to be a victory for America’s opponents in the short term—as was the case when the U.S. withdrew from Indochina—the larger battle with militant Islam can be won only by refocusing foreign and military policy away from these two quagmires.

This sober, objective assessment of what went wrong in the U.S.–led wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and the ways the West can disentangle itself and still move forward draws striking parallels with the Cold War. Anyone concerned with the future of the War on Terror will find Katz’s argument highly thought provoking.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

As the United States withdraws its combat troops from Iraq and Afghanistan, politicians, foreign policy specialists, and the public are worrying about the consequences of leaving these two countries. Neither nation can be considered stable, and progress toward democracy in them—a principal aim of America and the West—is fragile at best. But, international relations scholar Mark N. Katz asks: Could ending both wars actually help the United States and its allies to overcome radical Islam in the long term?

Drawing lessons from the Cold War, Katz makes the case that rather than signaling the decline of American power and influence, removing military forces from Afghanistan and Iraq puts the U.S. in a better position to counter the forces of radical Islam and ultimately win the war on terror. He explains that since both wars will likely remain intractable, for Washington to remain heavily involved in either is counter-productive. Katz argues that looking to its Cold War experience would help the U.S. find better strategies for employing America’s scarce resources to deal with its adversaries now. This means that, although leaving Afghanistan and Iraq may well appear to be a victory for America’s opponents in the short term—as was the case when the U.S. withdrew from Indochina—the larger battle with militant Islam can be won only by refocusing foreign and military policy away from these two quagmires.

This sober, objective assessment of what went wrong in the U.S.–led wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and the ways the West can disentangle itself and still move forward draws striking parallels with the Cold War. Anyone concerned with the future of the War on Terror will find Katz’s argument highly thought provoking.

More books from Johns Hopkins University Press

Cover of the book Introduction to US Health Policy by Mark N. Katz
Cover of the book Birds of Maryland, Delaware, and the District of Columbia by Mark N. Katz
Cover of the book Field Guide to the Natural World of Washington, D.C. by Mark N. Katz
Cover of the book The Return of Hans Staden by Mark N. Katz
Cover of the book Freedom's Laboratory by Mark N. Katz
Cover of the book Anna Letitia Barbauld and Eighteenth-Century Visionary Poetics by Mark N. Katz
Cover of the book Integrated Treatment for Mood and Substance Use Disorders by Mark N. Katz
Cover of the book Living in Death’s Shadow by Mark N. Katz
Cover of the book The Epidural Book by Mark N. Katz
Cover of the book Reductive Reading by Mark N. Katz
Cover of the book Moralizing the Market by Mark N. Katz
Cover of the book Making Computers Accessible by Mark N. Katz
Cover of the book Iron Coffin by Mark N. Katz
Cover of the book One Health and the Politics of Antimicrobial Resistance by Mark N. Katz
Cover of the book The Politics of Performance Funding for Higher Education by Mark N. Katz
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy