Liberalism, Neutrality, and the Gendered Division of Labor

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, Politics, History & Theory, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy
Cover of the book Liberalism, Neutrality, and the Gendered Division of Labor by Gina Schouten, OUP Oxford
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Gina Schouten ISBN: 9780192542465
Publisher: OUP Oxford Publication: May 2, 2019
Imprint: OUP Oxford Language: English
Author: Gina Schouten
ISBN: 9780192542465
Publisher: OUP Oxford
Publication: May 2, 2019
Imprint: OUP Oxford
Language: English

This book defends progressive political interventions to erode the gendered division of labor as legitimate exercises of coercive political power. The gendered division of labor is widely regarded as the linchpin of gender injustice. The process of gender equalization in domestic and paid labor allocations has stalled, and a growing number of scholars argue that, absent political intervention, further eroding of the gendered division of labor will not be forthcoming anytime soon. Certain political interventions could jumpstart the stalled gender revolution, but beyond their prospects for effectiveness, such interventions stand in need of another kind of justification. In a diverse, liberal state, reasonable citizens will disagree about what makes for a good life and a good society. Because a fundamental commitment of liberalism is to limit political intrusion into the lives of citizens and allow considerable space for those citizens to act on their own conceptions of the good, questions of legitimacy arise. Legitimacy concerns the constraints we must abide by as we seek collective political solutions to our shared social problems, given that we will disagree, reasonably, both about what constitutes a problem and about what costs we should be willing to incur to fix it. The interventions in question would effectively subsidize gender egalitarian lifestyles at a cost to those who prefer to maintain a traditional gendered division of labor. In a pluralistic, liberal society where many citizens reasonably resist the feminist agenda, can we legitimately use scarce public resources to finance coercive interventions to subsidize gender egalitarianism? This book argues that they can, and moreover, that they can even by the lights of political liberalism, a particularly demanding theory of liberal legitimacy.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

This book defends progressive political interventions to erode the gendered division of labor as legitimate exercises of coercive political power. The gendered division of labor is widely regarded as the linchpin of gender injustice. The process of gender equalization in domestic and paid labor allocations has stalled, and a growing number of scholars argue that, absent political intervention, further eroding of the gendered division of labor will not be forthcoming anytime soon. Certain political interventions could jumpstart the stalled gender revolution, but beyond their prospects for effectiveness, such interventions stand in need of another kind of justification. In a diverse, liberal state, reasonable citizens will disagree about what makes for a good life and a good society. Because a fundamental commitment of liberalism is to limit political intrusion into the lives of citizens and allow considerable space for those citizens to act on their own conceptions of the good, questions of legitimacy arise. Legitimacy concerns the constraints we must abide by as we seek collective political solutions to our shared social problems, given that we will disagree, reasonably, both about what constitutes a problem and about what costs we should be willing to incur to fix it. The interventions in question would effectively subsidize gender egalitarian lifestyles at a cost to those who prefer to maintain a traditional gendered division of labor. In a pluralistic, liberal society where many citizens reasonably resist the feminist agenda, can we legitimately use scarce public resources to finance coercive interventions to subsidize gender egalitarianism? This book argues that they can, and moreover, that they can even by the lights of political liberalism, a particularly demanding theory of liberal legitimacy.

More books from OUP Oxford

Cover of the book The Hound of the Baskervilles by Gina Schouten
Cover of the book Adult Nursing Practice by Gina Schouten
Cover of the book Paris Tales by Gina Schouten
Cover of the book Imperial Boredom by Gina Schouten
Cover of the book Cosmopolitan Peace by Gina Schouten
Cover of the book Wordsworth's Revisitings by Gina Schouten
Cover of the book The Masnavi, Book One by Gina Schouten
Cover of the book The Legacy of H.L.A. Hart by Gina Schouten
Cover of the book Crime Reduction Partnerships by Gina Schouten
Cover of the book The Oxford Handbook of Corpus Phonology by Gina Schouten
Cover of the book A Dictionary of Proverbs by Gina Schouten
Cover of the book The War Report by Gina Schouten
Cover of the book Prostate Cancer by Gina Schouten
Cover of the book Shakespeare and the Politics of Commoners by Gina Schouten
Cover of the book King Sigismund of Poland and Martin Luther by Gina Schouten
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy