Liberalism, Neutrality, and the Gendered Division of Labor

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, Politics, History & Theory, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy
Cover of the book Liberalism, Neutrality, and the Gendered Division of Labor by Gina Schouten, OUP Oxford
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Gina Schouten ISBN: 9780192542465
Publisher: OUP Oxford Publication: May 2, 2019
Imprint: OUP Oxford Language: English
Author: Gina Schouten
ISBN: 9780192542465
Publisher: OUP Oxford
Publication: May 2, 2019
Imprint: OUP Oxford
Language: English

This book defends progressive political interventions to erode the gendered division of labor as legitimate exercises of coercive political power. The gendered division of labor is widely regarded as the linchpin of gender injustice. The process of gender equalization in domestic and paid labor allocations has stalled, and a growing number of scholars argue that, absent political intervention, further eroding of the gendered division of labor will not be forthcoming anytime soon. Certain political interventions could jumpstart the stalled gender revolution, but beyond their prospects for effectiveness, such interventions stand in need of another kind of justification. In a diverse, liberal state, reasonable citizens will disagree about what makes for a good life and a good society. Because a fundamental commitment of liberalism is to limit political intrusion into the lives of citizens and allow considerable space for those citizens to act on their own conceptions of the good, questions of legitimacy arise. Legitimacy concerns the constraints we must abide by as we seek collective political solutions to our shared social problems, given that we will disagree, reasonably, both about what constitutes a problem and about what costs we should be willing to incur to fix it. The interventions in question would effectively subsidize gender egalitarian lifestyles at a cost to those who prefer to maintain a traditional gendered division of labor. In a pluralistic, liberal society where many citizens reasonably resist the feminist agenda, can we legitimately use scarce public resources to finance coercive interventions to subsidize gender egalitarianism? This book argues that they can, and moreover, that they can even by the lights of political liberalism, a particularly demanding theory of liberal legitimacy.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

This book defends progressive political interventions to erode the gendered division of labor as legitimate exercises of coercive political power. The gendered division of labor is widely regarded as the linchpin of gender injustice. The process of gender equalization in domestic and paid labor allocations has stalled, and a growing number of scholars argue that, absent political intervention, further eroding of the gendered division of labor will not be forthcoming anytime soon. Certain political interventions could jumpstart the stalled gender revolution, but beyond their prospects for effectiveness, such interventions stand in need of another kind of justification. In a diverse, liberal state, reasonable citizens will disagree about what makes for a good life and a good society. Because a fundamental commitment of liberalism is to limit political intrusion into the lives of citizens and allow considerable space for those citizens to act on their own conceptions of the good, questions of legitimacy arise. Legitimacy concerns the constraints we must abide by as we seek collective political solutions to our shared social problems, given that we will disagree, reasonably, both about what constitutes a problem and about what costs we should be willing to incur to fix it. The interventions in question would effectively subsidize gender egalitarian lifestyles at a cost to those who prefer to maintain a traditional gendered division of labor. In a pluralistic, liberal society where many citizens reasonably resist the feminist agenda, can we legitimately use scarce public resources to finance coercive interventions to subsidize gender egalitarianism? This book argues that they can, and moreover, that they can even by the lights of political liberalism, a particularly demanding theory of liberal legitimacy.

More books from OUP Oxford

Cover of the book Selected Dialogues by Gina Schouten
Cover of the book Spain, 1833-2002 by Gina Schouten
Cover of the book Strategy, HRM, and Performance by Gina Schouten
Cover of the book The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights by Gina Schouten
Cover of the book Depression by Gina Schouten
Cover of the book Ancient Egyptian Art and Architecture: A Very Short Introduction by Gina Schouten
Cover of the book Goldoni in Paris by Gina Schouten
Cover of the book The Holy Roman Empire: A Very Short Introduction by Gina Schouten
Cover of the book Making Oscar Wilde by Gina Schouten
Cover of the book Emotion Regulation and Psychopathology in Children and Adolescents by Gina Schouten
Cover of the book Constitutional Pluralism in the EU by Gina Schouten
Cover of the book Kidnapped by Gina Schouten
Cover of the book Third Party Litigation Funding by Gina Schouten
Cover of the book Veterinary Science: A Very Short Introduction by Gina Schouten
Cover of the book The Oxford Handbook of Modern Irish Theatre by Gina Schouten
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy