MDMA-induced serotonergic neurotoxicity

Nonfiction, Health & Well Being, Psychology, Physiological Psychology
Cover of the book MDMA-induced serotonergic neurotoxicity by Dominik Buchmüller, GRIN Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Dominik Buchmüller ISBN: 9783640439676
Publisher: GRIN Publishing Publication: October 6, 2009
Imprint: GRIN Publishing Language: English
Author: Dominik Buchmüller
ISBN: 9783640439676
Publisher: GRIN Publishing
Publication: October 6, 2009
Imprint: GRIN Publishing
Language: English

Seminar paper from the year 2009 in the subject Psychology - Biological Psychology, grade: A (100%), New College Durham (Duke University, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience), course: Behavior and Neurochemistry, language: English, abstract: It is the aim of this paper to review and integrate relevant empirical findings and theoretical discussions concerning the molecular and cellular mechanisms and effects of MDMA-induced 5-HT neurotoxicity in laboratory animals. 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) is a derivative of the synthetic psychostimulant methamphetamine (METH). It also shares some structural and pharmacological properties of mescaline, a naturally occurring psychedelic hallucinogen. At the molecular level, all three substances resemble the monoamine neurotransmitters epinephrine (E) and dopamine (DA). They mimic the neurophysiological actions and effects of E and DA, as well as serotonin (5-HT). METH and MDMA do so by binding to, and reversal of monoamine-specific transporter proteins at the presynaptic plasma membrane. While the psychological effects of METH are mainly due its action as a DA release agent and reuptake inhibitor, MDMA primarily affects the serotonergic system. It has a high affinity for the serotonin-specific transporter (SERT), which carries it into the presynaptic neuron. Inside the cell, MDMA inhibits the vesicular monoamine transporter type 2 (VMAT2), pre-venting intracellular 5-HT from being stored in synaptic vesicles. In addition, MDMA phos-phorylates SERT, which causes a reversal of its reuptake function and, hence, non-exocytotic efflux of 5-HT by the means of passive diffusion. Because neurotransmitter release normally only occurs in case of an action potential, and the released transmitter is partly reabsorbed and recycled, the reverse functioning of SERT depletes 5-HT stores. The equivalent effect of METH via reversal of the DA transporter (DAT) has been linked to its neurotoxic properties (Yamamoto & Zhu, 1998). As a derivative of methamphetamine, MDMA is sometimes believed to have inherited the severe dopaminergic neurotoxicity of METH and its parent compound amphetamine. Such neurotoxic potential has been found in mice but not in rats (Colado, O'Shea, and Green, 2004), and remains to be established for non-human primates. The probably most prominent publication claiming that MDMA caused irreversible damage to primate DA neurons (Ricaurte et al., 2002) was shown to be in error and had to be retracted. Instead of a recreational dose of MDMA (3 2 mg/kg), the monkeys had, in fact, been given METH, which, at such doses, is known to be neurotoxic in primates (Villemagne et al., 1998). [...]

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Seminar paper from the year 2009 in the subject Psychology - Biological Psychology, grade: A (100%), New College Durham (Duke University, Department of Psychology and Neuroscience), course: Behavior and Neurochemistry, language: English, abstract: It is the aim of this paper to review and integrate relevant empirical findings and theoretical discussions concerning the molecular and cellular mechanisms and effects of MDMA-induced 5-HT neurotoxicity in laboratory animals. 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) is a derivative of the synthetic psychostimulant methamphetamine (METH). It also shares some structural and pharmacological properties of mescaline, a naturally occurring psychedelic hallucinogen. At the molecular level, all three substances resemble the monoamine neurotransmitters epinephrine (E) and dopamine (DA). They mimic the neurophysiological actions and effects of E and DA, as well as serotonin (5-HT). METH and MDMA do so by binding to, and reversal of monoamine-specific transporter proteins at the presynaptic plasma membrane. While the psychological effects of METH are mainly due its action as a DA release agent and reuptake inhibitor, MDMA primarily affects the serotonergic system. It has a high affinity for the serotonin-specific transporter (SERT), which carries it into the presynaptic neuron. Inside the cell, MDMA inhibits the vesicular monoamine transporter type 2 (VMAT2), pre-venting intracellular 5-HT from being stored in synaptic vesicles. In addition, MDMA phos-phorylates SERT, which causes a reversal of its reuptake function and, hence, non-exocytotic efflux of 5-HT by the means of passive diffusion. Because neurotransmitter release normally only occurs in case of an action potential, and the released transmitter is partly reabsorbed and recycled, the reverse functioning of SERT depletes 5-HT stores. The equivalent effect of METH via reversal of the DA transporter (DAT) has been linked to its neurotoxic properties (Yamamoto & Zhu, 1998). As a derivative of methamphetamine, MDMA is sometimes believed to have inherited the severe dopaminergic neurotoxicity of METH and its parent compound amphetamine. Such neurotoxic potential has been found in mice but not in rats (Colado, O'Shea, and Green, 2004), and remains to be established for non-human primates. The probably most prominent publication claiming that MDMA caused irreversible damage to primate DA neurons (Ricaurte et al., 2002) was shown to be in error and had to be retracted. Instead of a recreational dose of MDMA (3 2 mg/kg), the monkeys had, in fact, been given METH, which, at such doses, is known to be neurotoxic in primates (Villemagne et al., 1998). [...]

More books from GRIN Publishing

Cover of the book Raise of the Midgets. Towards a European Security and Defence Policy. by Dominik Buchmüller
Cover of the book Is the anthrax scare of 2001 real or constructed? by Dominik Buchmüller
Cover of the book The Repercussions of Software Piracy: Damages, Approaches of Control, and Benefits from Reducing Piracy Rates by Dominik Buchmüller
Cover of the book Leadership traits and theories. A Review by Dominik Buchmüller
Cover of the book Toward a Russian market economy by Dominik Buchmüller
Cover of the book Measures for Successful Strategic Information Systems Planning by Dominik Buchmüller
Cover of the book Voter's choice in Ukraine's Presidential and Parliamentary Elections since 1994 by Dominik Buchmüller
Cover of the book The conversion of Iceland - a political event by Dominik Buchmüller
Cover of the book Impact of trade and foreign investments on the industrial change in China by Dominik Buchmüller
Cover of the book Die Anatomie politischer Machtkämpfe im post-stalinistischen Me?ducarstvie 1953-1955 by Dominik Buchmüller
Cover of the book Decentralisation within the EU: Committee of the Regions - an undemocratic talking workshop? by Dominik Buchmüller
Cover of the book Föderalismus in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland von 1970 bis 1989 by Dominik Buchmüller
Cover of the book Examine the representation of the relationship between language and power inSouth African Literature by Dominik Buchmüller
Cover of the book Analysis of Lord Byron's Poem 'Well! Thou art happy' by Dominik Buchmüller
Cover of the book A discussion on the article 'Generalised improvement in speech production for subject with reproduction conduction aphasia' by Dominik Buchmüller
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy