Moral Responsibility

Beyond Free Will and Determinism

Nonfiction, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy, Reference, Ethics & Moral Philosophy
Cover of the book Moral Responsibility by , Springer Netherlands
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: ISBN: 9789400718784
Publisher: Springer Netherlands Publication: August 17, 2011
Imprint: Springer Language: English
Author:
ISBN: 9789400718784
Publisher: Springer Netherlands
Publication: August 17, 2011
Imprint: Springer
Language: English

It is well over a decade since John Fischer and Mark Ravizza – and before them, Jay Wallace and Daniel Dennett – defended responsibility from the threat of determinism. But defending responsibility from determinism is a potentially endless and largely negative enterprise; it can go on for as long as dissenting voices remain, and although such work strengthens the theoretical foundations of these theories, it won’t necessarily build anything on top of those foundations, nor will it move these theories into new territory or explain how to apply them to practical contexts.

To this end, the papers in this volume address these more positive challenges by exploring how compatibilist responsibility theory can be extended and/or applied in a range of practical contexts. For instance, how is the narrow philosophical concept of responsibility that was defended from the threat of determinism related to the plural notions of responsibility present in everyday discourse, and how might this more fine-grained understanding of responsibility open up new vistas and challenges for compatibilist theory? What light might compatibilism shed, and what light might be shed upon it, by political debates about access to public welfare in the context of responsibility for one’s own health, and by legal debates about the impact of self-intoxication on responsibility. Does compatibilist theory, which was originally designed to cater for analysis of individual actions, scale to scenarios that involve group action and collective responsibility — e.g. for harms due to human-induced climate change? 

This book’s chapters deal with a range of theoretical problems discussed in classic compatibilist literature — e.g. the relationship between responsibility and capacity, the role of historical tracing in discounting the exculpatory value of incapacities, and the justifiability of retributive punishment. But instead of motivating their discussions by focusing on the alleged threat that determinism poses to responsibility, these chapters’ authors have animated their discussions by tackling important practical problems which crop up in contemporary debates about responsibility. 

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

It is well over a decade since John Fischer and Mark Ravizza – and before them, Jay Wallace and Daniel Dennett – defended responsibility from the threat of determinism. But defending responsibility from determinism is a potentially endless and largely negative enterprise; it can go on for as long as dissenting voices remain, and although such work strengthens the theoretical foundations of these theories, it won’t necessarily build anything on top of those foundations, nor will it move these theories into new territory or explain how to apply them to practical contexts.

To this end, the papers in this volume address these more positive challenges by exploring how compatibilist responsibility theory can be extended and/or applied in a range of practical contexts. For instance, how is the narrow philosophical concept of responsibility that was defended from the threat of determinism related to the plural notions of responsibility present in everyday discourse, and how might this more fine-grained understanding of responsibility open up new vistas and challenges for compatibilist theory? What light might compatibilism shed, and what light might be shed upon it, by political debates about access to public welfare in the context of responsibility for one’s own health, and by legal debates about the impact of self-intoxication on responsibility. Does compatibilist theory, which was originally designed to cater for analysis of individual actions, scale to scenarios that involve group action and collective responsibility — e.g. for harms due to human-induced climate change? 

This book’s chapters deal with a range of theoretical problems discussed in classic compatibilist literature — e.g. the relationship between responsibility and capacity, the role of historical tracing in discounting the exculpatory value of incapacities, and the justifiability of retributive punishment. But instead of motivating their discussions by focusing on the alleged threat that determinism poses to responsibility, these chapters’ authors have animated their discussions by tackling important practical problems which crop up in contemporary debates about responsibility. 

More books from Springer Netherlands

Cover of the book Historical Foundations of Cognitive Science by
Cover of the book Perfumes, Cosmetics and Soaps by
Cover of the book Modern Origins by
Cover of the book The Red Soils of China by
Cover of the book Truth and Belief by
Cover of the book Law and Regulation of Commercial Mining of Minerals in Outer Space by
Cover of the book Annual Reports in Combinatorial Chemistry and Molecular Diversity by
Cover of the book Petrology of the Sedimentary Rocks by
Cover of the book Petrographic Atlas: Characterisation of Aggregates Regarding Potential Reactivity to Alkalis by
Cover of the book Adult and Pluripotent Stem Cells by
Cover of the book Minesite Recultivation by
Cover of the book Helminth Zoonoses by
Cover of the book Stem Cells and Human Diseases by
Cover of the book Studies on Gottlob Frege and Traditional Philosophy by
Cover of the book Practice and Progress in Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology by
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy