More Women Can Run

Gender and Pathways to the State Legislatures

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, Government, Political Parties, Politics, Civil Rights, Social Science, Gender Studies, Women&
Cover of the book More Women Can Run by Susan J. Carroll, Kira Sanbonmatsu, Oxford University Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Susan J. Carroll, Kira Sanbonmatsu ISBN: 9780199361168
Publisher: Oxford University Press Publication: August 2, 2013
Imprint: Oxford University Press Language: English
Author: Susan J. Carroll, Kira Sanbonmatsu
ISBN: 9780199361168
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Publication: August 2, 2013
Imprint: Oxford University Press
Language: English

Women remain dramatically underrepresented in elective office, including in entry-level political offices. While they enjoy the freedom to stand for office and therefore have an equal legal footing with men, this persistent gender imbalance raises pressing questions about democratic legitimacy, the inclusivity of American politics, and the quality of political representation. The reasons for women's underrepresentation remain the subject of much debate. One explanation--that the United States lacks sufficient openings for political newcomers--has become less compelling in recent years, as states that have adopted term limits have not seen the expected gains in women's office holding. Other accounts about candidate scarcity, gender inequalities in society, and the lingering effects of gendered socialization have some merit; however, these accounts still fail to explain the relatively low numbers. Drawing upon original surveys conducted in 1981 and 2008 by the Center for American Women and Politics (CAWP) of women state legislators across all fifty states, and follow-up interviews after the 2008 survey, the authors find that gender differences in pathways to the legislatures, first evident in 1981, have been surprisingly persistent over time. They find that, while the ambition framework better explains men's decisions to run for office, a relationally embedded model of candidate emergence better captures women's decision-making, with women's decisions more often influenced by the encouragement and support of parties, organizations, and family members. By rethinking the nature of women's representation, this study calls for a reorientation of academic research on women's election to office and provides insight into new strategies for political practitioners concerned about women's political equality.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Women remain dramatically underrepresented in elective office, including in entry-level political offices. While they enjoy the freedom to stand for office and therefore have an equal legal footing with men, this persistent gender imbalance raises pressing questions about democratic legitimacy, the inclusivity of American politics, and the quality of political representation. The reasons for women's underrepresentation remain the subject of much debate. One explanation--that the United States lacks sufficient openings for political newcomers--has become less compelling in recent years, as states that have adopted term limits have not seen the expected gains in women's office holding. Other accounts about candidate scarcity, gender inequalities in society, and the lingering effects of gendered socialization have some merit; however, these accounts still fail to explain the relatively low numbers. Drawing upon original surveys conducted in 1981 and 2008 by the Center for American Women and Politics (CAWP) of women state legislators across all fifty states, and follow-up interviews after the 2008 survey, the authors find that gender differences in pathways to the legislatures, first evident in 1981, have been surprisingly persistent over time. They find that, while the ambition framework better explains men's decisions to run for office, a relationally embedded model of candidate emergence better captures women's decision-making, with women's decisions more often influenced by the encouragement and support of parties, organizations, and family members. By rethinking the nature of women's representation, this study calls for a reorientation of academic research on women's election to office and provides insight into new strategies for political practitioners concerned about women's political equality.

More books from Oxford University Press

Cover of the book Race, Ethnicity, Crime, and Justice: Oxford Bibliographies Online Research Guide by Susan J. Carroll, Kira Sanbonmatsu
Cover of the book Basic Electrophysiological Methods by Susan J. Carroll, Kira Sanbonmatsu
Cover of the book The Oxford Companion to the History of Modern Science by Susan J. Carroll, Kira Sanbonmatsu
Cover of the book The Spiritual-Industrial Complex by Susan J. Carroll, Kira Sanbonmatsu
Cover of the book Life After Grad School by Susan J. Carroll, Kira Sanbonmatsu
Cover of the book Islam in Central Asia: Oxford Bibliographies Online Research Guide by Susan J. Carroll, Kira Sanbonmatsu
Cover of the book An African Volk by Susan J. Carroll, Kira Sanbonmatsu
Cover of the book Top Drugs by Susan J. Carroll, Kira Sanbonmatsu
Cover of the book Women's Work by Susan J. Carroll, Kira Sanbonmatsu
Cover of the book War in the Hebrew Bible by Susan J. Carroll, Kira Sanbonmatsu
Cover of the book Postsecular Catholicism by Susan J. Carroll, Kira Sanbonmatsu
Cover of the book On Evil by Susan J. Carroll, Kira Sanbonmatsu
Cover of the book Muslim Spain: Oxford Bibliographies Online Research Guide by Susan J. Carroll, Kira Sanbonmatsu
Cover of the book Indirect Procedures: A Musician's Guide to the Alexander Technique by Susan J. Carroll, Kira Sanbonmatsu
Cover of the book Migrant, Refugee, Smuggler, Savior by Susan J. Carroll, Kira Sanbonmatsu
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy