Natural Death in Baudrillard

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Social Science, Sociology
Cover of the book Natural Death in Baudrillard by Johannes Lenhard, GRIN Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Johannes Lenhard ISBN: 9783656184478
Publisher: GRIN Publishing Publication: May 7, 2012
Imprint: GRIN Publishing Language: English
Author: Johannes Lenhard
ISBN: 9783656184478
Publisher: GRIN Publishing
Publication: May 7, 2012
Imprint: GRIN Publishing
Language: English

Essay from the year 2012 in the subject Sociology - Classics and Theoretical Directions, grade: 2:1, London School of Economics, language: English, abstract: According to Baudrillard, the contemporary 'value system' is based on binary oppositions. The most vital of those are good and evil, man and machine and crucially important life and death. In our society, death is increasingly separated from life in stark contrast to what is still to be found in the 'primitive cultures'. Without being able to explain the alternative system - symbolic exchange - in its complexity, it is important to note its contrasting idea of 'a circular form, a circuit, reversibility' (Baudrillard, 2003: 16ff). In a symbolic system associated but not limited to 'primitives', death is not negativity, not endpoint but rather charged with symbolic meaning as part of a constant exchange procedure, always part of life. For us, death is 'abnormal' and we are constantly striving to extinguish it, make it 'extraterritorial' (Baudrillard, 1993: 126, 182) (e.g. in hospitals, out-of-town cemeteries, palliative clinics). In the following paragraphs, the essay will suggest a reading of Baudrillard's contrasting notion of 'natural death' that he claims to be 'everyone's right and duty'. In the first part, we give a close reading of Baudrillard's notion of natural death - without a primarily critical reflection. What will be suggested is that progress creates both the possibility for a natural, i.e. designed, death and its imperative. The critical reflection of part two will try to qualify Baudrillard's statements with a general critique of his ironic style and advance arguments with regards to content: How is it possible to close of individuality? Is it really a right for 'everyone'? Before this critical account can be appreciated, however, the notion of 'natural death' shall be explained in the following.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Essay from the year 2012 in the subject Sociology - Classics and Theoretical Directions, grade: 2:1, London School of Economics, language: English, abstract: According to Baudrillard, the contemporary 'value system' is based on binary oppositions. The most vital of those are good and evil, man and machine and crucially important life and death. In our society, death is increasingly separated from life in stark contrast to what is still to be found in the 'primitive cultures'. Without being able to explain the alternative system - symbolic exchange - in its complexity, it is important to note its contrasting idea of 'a circular form, a circuit, reversibility' (Baudrillard, 2003: 16ff). In a symbolic system associated but not limited to 'primitives', death is not negativity, not endpoint but rather charged with symbolic meaning as part of a constant exchange procedure, always part of life. For us, death is 'abnormal' and we are constantly striving to extinguish it, make it 'extraterritorial' (Baudrillard, 1993: 126, 182) (e.g. in hospitals, out-of-town cemeteries, palliative clinics). In the following paragraphs, the essay will suggest a reading of Baudrillard's contrasting notion of 'natural death' that he claims to be 'everyone's right and duty'. In the first part, we give a close reading of Baudrillard's notion of natural death - without a primarily critical reflection. What will be suggested is that progress creates both the possibility for a natural, i.e. designed, death and its imperative. The critical reflection of part two will try to qualify Baudrillard's statements with a general critique of his ironic style and advance arguments with regards to content: How is it possible to close of individuality? Is it really a right for 'everyone'? Before this critical account can be appreciated, however, the notion of 'natural death' shall be explained in the following.

More books from GRIN Publishing

Cover of the book Social Business as a Sustainable Business Concept by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Landscape and mythology in M. Scott Momady´s 'House Made of Dawn' by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Multilingualism within Nation States and the Danger of Separation by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Just in Time: El sistema de producción Justo a Tiempo by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Linguistic sign theories by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book 'Bloody Sunday' and its evaluation in the press by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Schapelle Corby - Australian media making a case by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book All the World's a Stage by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book A critical comparison of Internationalisation theories: Eclectic Paradigm of Dunning vs. Uppsala School by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book The Phylogenesis of Aspect in English by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Eating Right with Hemochromatosis. A Diet Guide for Reducing Iron by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book Translating and Reimagining - Recovering Pizarnik in her late Prose Works by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book The lessons to be learned from Peyton Farquhar - 'An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge' and its (anti)hero by Johannes Lenhard
Cover of the book A 'new' and 'historical' theatre in Bertolt Brecht's 'Life of Galileo'? by Johannes Lenhard
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy