Polygon Calculus

Nonfiction, Science & Nature, Mathematics, Calculus, Religion & Spirituality
Cover of the book Polygon Calculus by Edward E. Rochon, Edward E. Rochon
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Edward E. Rochon ISBN: 9781370723096
Publisher: Edward E. Rochon Publication: November 25, 2016
Imprint: Smashwords Edition Language: English
Author: Edward E. Rochon
ISBN: 9781370723096
Publisher: Edward E. Rochon
Publication: November 25, 2016
Imprint: Smashwords Edition
Language: English

A preface states my intent, apologizes for errors in past work and my method of working. Chapter 1 starts with the equations for the improper integrals for (1/x) and (1/x2)[sq of x]. The lines supposedly project to infinity, but one has an infinite area and the other of 1. This is clearly false. Assuming an infinite progression of any quantity, you would have an infinite summation. I attack the number line continuum as contradictory and untrue. Without increments between numbers, all points on the line would be the same point. I show division of infinity is impossible, as well as any mathematical operations upon it. Chapter 2 shows that curves cannot be continuums, a continuous progression of a curve. They are all partial polygons. It is the parallel line that is sacrosanct by logic, contrary to what the math shamans maintain. I explain that equations not only have limits in their domains, but the equation itself is limited by its parameters. In the case of approaching asymptotes, the equation either falls short and runs parallel to the axis (so called infinite area), or runs parallel to the axis, or crosses the axis (definite area.) In all three cases, the equation domain is no longer within the equation limits. Parallel lines, whether falling short of or parallel to axes, are no longer approaching an asymptote. The equation is outside of its parameters. If the curve crosses the axis, it moves away from the axis and no longer within the equation limits. The domain must cease at these finite limits. We see that calculus is not a true math, but a souped up statistical analysis. Chapter 3 says my original intent was to lay the foundation of polygon or incremental calculus, but stopped short for reasons explained briefly in the preface and here. I encourage readers to check out related essays by me and thank them for their interest, and encourage experts and those with avocations to pursue where I have left off.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

A preface states my intent, apologizes for errors in past work and my method of working. Chapter 1 starts with the equations for the improper integrals for (1/x) and (1/x2)[sq of x]. The lines supposedly project to infinity, but one has an infinite area and the other of 1. This is clearly false. Assuming an infinite progression of any quantity, you would have an infinite summation. I attack the number line continuum as contradictory and untrue. Without increments between numbers, all points on the line would be the same point. I show division of infinity is impossible, as well as any mathematical operations upon it. Chapter 2 shows that curves cannot be continuums, a continuous progression of a curve. They are all partial polygons. It is the parallel line that is sacrosanct by logic, contrary to what the math shamans maintain. I explain that equations not only have limits in their domains, but the equation itself is limited by its parameters. In the case of approaching asymptotes, the equation either falls short and runs parallel to the axis (so called infinite area), or runs parallel to the axis, or crosses the axis (definite area.) In all three cases, the equation domain is no longer within the equation limits. Parallel lines, whether falling short of or parallel to axes, are no longer approaching an asymptote. The equation is outside of its parameters. If the curve crosses the axis, it moves away from the axis and no longer within the equation limits. The domain must cease at these finite limits. We see that calculus is not a true math, but a souped up statistical analysis. Chapter 3 says my original intent was to lay the foundation of polygon or incremental calculus, but stopped short for reasons explained briefly in the preface and here. I encourage readers to check out related essays by me and thank them for their interest, and encourage experts and those with avocations to pursue where I have left off.

More books from Edward E. Rochon

Cover of the book Contra Nominalism: An Essay by Edward E. Rochon
Cover of the book Suicide Tonight by Edward E. Rochon
Cover of the book Paradoxes by Edward E. Rochon
Cover of the book Plan RD: An Essay by Edward E. Rochon
Cover of the book Epicurean Fraud: An Essay by Edward E. Rochon
Cover of the book Light Capacitor: An Essay by Edward E. Rochon
Cover of the book Trinity & Mandala: An Essay by Edward E. Rochon
Cover of the book Collected Poems II by Edward E. Rochon
Cover of the book Guns & Salvation: An Essay by Edward E. Rochon
Cover of the book Visions in America III by Edward E. Rochon
Cover of the book Ethereal Mea Culpa by Edward E. Rochon
Cover of the book M4 Money: An Essay by Edward E. Rochon
Cover of the book Substance & Fraud by Edward E. Rochon
Cover of the book On Method: An Essay by Edward E. Rochon
Cover of the book Clitwits & G-Spots: An Essay by Edward E. Rochon
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy