Rational Lawmaking under Review

Legisprudence According to the German Federal Constitutional Court

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Reference, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, Politics, History & Theory
Cover of the book Rational Lawmaking under Review by , Springer International Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: ISBN: 9783319332178
Publisher: Springer International Publishing Publication: July 26, 2016
Imprint: Springer Language: English
Author:
ISBN: 9783319332178
Publisher: Springer International Publishing
Publication: July 26, 2016
Imprint: Springer
Language: English

This book explores the constitutional, legally binding dimension to legisprudence in the light of the German Federal Constitutional Court´s approach to rational lawmaking. Over the last decades this court has been remarkably active in applying legisprudential criteria and standards when reviewing parliamentary laws. It has thus supplied observers with a unique material to analyse the lawmakers’ dutyto legislate rationally, and to assess the virtues and drawbacks of this strand of judicial control in a constitutional democracy. By bringing together legislation experts and public law scholars to elaborate on ‘legisprudence under review’, this contributed volume aspires to shed light on the constitutionalisation of rational lawmaking as a controversial trend gaining ground in both national and international jurisdictions. The book is divided into five parts. Part I frames the two key issues pervading the whole collection: the intricate relationship between judicial review and democracy, on the one hand, and the possibility of improving and rationalizing the task of legislation under the current circumstances of politics, on the other. Part II provides an overview of the judicial review of rational lawmaking, laying special emphasis on the duty of legislative justification imposed on lawmakers by the German Constitutional Court. Part III is devoted to the review of the systemic rationality of legislation, in particular to the requirements of legislative consistence and coherence as developed by this court. Contributions in Part IV revolve around the judicial scrutiny of the socio-empirical elements of rational lawmaking, with the control of legislative facts and impacts and the problem of symbolic laws being the central topics. Finally, Part V draws on the German case law to discuss the links between rational lawmaking, balancing and proportionality, and the interdependence between process review and substantive review of legislation.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

This book explores the constitutional, legally binding dimension to legisprudence in the light of the German Federal Constitutional Court´s approach to rational lawmaking. Over the last decades this court has been remarkably active in applying legisprudential criteria and standards when reviewing parliamentary laws. It has thus supplied observers with a unique material to analyse the lawmakers’ dutyto legislate rationally, and to assess the virtues and drawbacks of this strand of judicial control in a constitutional democracy. By bringing together legislation experts and public law scholars to elaborate on ‘legisprudence under review’, this contributed volume aspires to shed light on the constitutionalisation of rational lawmaking as a controversial trend gaining ground in both national and international jurisdictions. The book is divided into five parts. Part I frames the two key issues pervading the whole collection: the intricate relationship between judicial review and democracy, on the one hand, and the possibility of improving and rationalizing the task of legislation under the current circumstances of politics, on the other. Part II provides an overview of the judicial review of rational lawmaking, laying special emphasis on the duty of legislative justification imposed on lawmakers by the German Constitutional Court. Part III is devoted to the review of the systemic rationality of legislation, in particular to the requirements of legislative consistence and coherence as developed by this court. Contributions in Part IV revolve around the judicial scrutiny of the socio-empirical elements of rational lawmaking, with the control of legislative facts and impacts and the problem of symbolic laws being the central topics. Finally, Part V draws on the German case law to discuss the links between rational lawmaking, balancing and proportionality, and the interdependence between process review and substantive review of legislation.

More books from Springer International Publishing

Cover of the book Python for Signal Processing by
Cover of the book The Neuropilins: Role and Function in Health and Disease by
Cover of the book The Ambient Intelligent Classroom by
Cover of the book Ecological Modelling Applied to Entomology by
Cover of the book Recent Advances on Mycorrhizal Fungi by
Cover of the book Robust Multimodal Cognitive Load Measurement by
Cover of the book Electromagnetic Fields and Waves by
Cover of the book Progress in Materials Science and Engineering by
Cover of the book Situation Recognition Using EventShop by
Cover of the book Introduction to Sofic and Hyperlinear Groups and Connes' Embedding Conjecture by
Cover of the book Refinement by
Cover of the book Smart Structures and Materials by
Cover of the book Clinical Ethics Consultation Toolkit by
Cover of the book Sociopolitics of Migrant Death and Repatriation by
Cover of the book Principal Bundles by
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy