Red, White & Black

Cinema and the Structure of U.S. Antagonisms

Nonfiction, Entertainment, Film, History & Criticism, Performing Arts, Social & Cultural Studies, Social Science, Cultural Studies, African-American Studies
Cover of the book Red, White & Black by Frank B. Wilderson III, Duke University Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Frank B. Wilderson III ISBN: 9780822391715
Publisher: Duke University Press Publication: March 19, 2010
Imprint: Duke University Press Books Language: English
Author: Frank B. Wilderson III
ISBN: 9780822391715
Publisher: Duke University Press
Publication: March 19, 2010
Imprint: Duke University Press Books
Language: English

Red, White & Black is a provocative critique of socially engaged films and related critical discourse. Offering an unflinching account of race and representation, Frank B. Wilderson III asks whether such films accurately represent the structure of U.S. racial antagonisms. That structure, he argues, is based on three essential subject positions: that of the White (the “settler,” “master,” and “human”), the Red (the “savage” and “half-human”), and the Black (the “slave” and “non-human”). Wilderson contends that for Blacks, slavery is ontological, an inseparable element of their being. From the beginning of the European slave trade until now, Blacks have had symbolic value as fungible flesh, as the non-human (or anti-human) against which Whites have defined themselves as human. Just as slavery is the existential basis of the Black subject position, genocide is essential to the ontology of the Indian. Both positions are foundational to the existence of (White) humanity.

Wilderson provides detailed readings of two films by Black directors, Antwone Fisher (Denzel Washington) and Bush Mama (Haile Gerima); one by an Indian director, Skins (Chris Eyre); and one by a White director, Monster’s Ball (Marc Foster). These films present Red and Black people beleaguered by problems such as homelessness and the repercussions of incarceration. They portray social turmoil in terms of conflict, as problems that can be solved (at least theoretically, if not in the given narratives). Wilderson maintains that at the narrative level, they fail to recognize that the turmoil is based not in conflict, but in fundamentally irreconcilable racial antagonisms. Yet, as he explains, those antagonisms are unintentionally disclosed in the films’ non-narrative strategies, in decisions regarding matters such as lighting, camera angles, and sound.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Red, White & Black is a provocative critique of socially engaged films and related critical discourse. Offering an unflinching account of race and representation, Frank B. Wilderson III asks whether such films accurately represent the structure of U.S. racial antagonisms. That structure, he argues, is based on three essential subject positions: that of the White (the “settler,” “master,” and “human”), the Red (the “savage” and “half-human”), and the Black (the “slave” and “non-human”). Wilderson contends that for Blacks, slavery is ontological, an inseparable element of their being. From the beginning of the European slave trade until now, Blacks have had symbolic value as fungible flesh, as the non-human (or anti-human) against which Whites have defined themselves as human. Just as slavery is the existential basis of the Black subject position, genocide is essential to the ontology of the Indian. Both positions are foundational to the existence of (White) humanity.

Wilderson provides detailed readings of two films by Black directors, Antwone Fisher (Denzel Washington) and Bush Mama (Haile Gerima); one by an Indian director, Skins (Chris Eyre); and one by a White director, Monster’s Ball (Marc Foster). These films present Red and Black people beleaguered by problems such as homelessness and the repercussions of incarceration. They portray social turmoil in terms of conflict, as problems that can be solved (at least theoretically, if not in the given narratives). Wilderson maintains that at the narrative level, they fail to recognize that the turmoil is based not in conflict, but in fundamentally irreconcilable racial antagonisms. Yet, as he explains, those antagonisms are unintentionally disclosed in the films’ non-narrative strategies, in decisions regarding matters such as lighting, camera angles, and sound.

More books from Duke University Press

Cover of the book What Is a World? by Frank B. Wilderson III
Cover of the book In Search of First Contact by Frank B. Wilderson III
Cover of the book Fear of Small Numbers by Frank B. Wilderson III
Cover of the book Dulcinea in the Factory by Frank B. Wilderson III
Cover of the book Making Cinelandia by Frank B. Wilderson III
Cover of the book Freedom in Entangled Worlds by Frank B. Wilderson III
Cover of the book Bacchanalian Sentiments by Frank B. Wilderson III
Cover of the book Leviathans at the Gold Mine by Frank B. Wilderson III
Cover of the book Poor People's Medicine by Frank B. Wilderson III
Cover of the book The Brazil Reader by Frank B. Wilderson III
Cover of the book Living Color by Frank B. Wilderson III
Cover of the book The Fetish Revisited by Frank B. Wilderson III
Cover of the book Present Tense by Frank B. Wilderson III
Cover of the book The Ruling Passion by Frank B. Wilderson III
Cover of the book For the Record by Frank B. Wilderson III
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy