Reevaluation Of Pemberton At Vicksburg

Nonfiction, History, Modern, 19th Century, Americas, United States, Civil War Period (1850-1877), Military
Cover of the book Reevaluation Of Pemberton At Vicksburg by Major Malcolm G. Haynes, Golden Springs Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Major Malcolm G. Haynes ISBN: 9781786253002
Publisher: Golden Springs Publishing Publication: November 6, 2015
Imprint: Golden Springs Publishing Language: English
Author: Major Malcolm G. Haynes
ISBN: 9781786253002
Publisher: Golden Springs Publishing
Publication: November 6, 2015
Imprint: Golden Springs Publishing
Language: English

Historians have largely agreed that Pemberton should shoulder the blame for the poor Confederate performance during the Vicksburg campaign. General consensus exists among American Civil War historians that Pemberton proved a confused, indecisive, and incompetent commander and his poor leadership led to the Confederate defeat. However, an examination of the Vicksburg campaign conducted at the operational level of war shows that throughout the campaign, Pemberton led a capable and competent defense not just of Vicksburg, but of the Mississippi Department he commanded. He relied on an operational approach that involved fighting from prepared defensive positions in favorable terrain deep in his own territory and anchored by natural obstacles. To attack such a position, Pemberton knew an opponent would need a large force operating over an extended line of communications (LOC). Pemberton intended to interdict his opponent’s LOC using a strong cavalry force, thus preventing the enemy from achieving the offensive momentum necessary to break through Vicksburg’s defenses. This was a sound operational approach. However, it failed because of an ineffective Confederate command structure that, among other failures, denied Pemberton the resources, particularly adequate cavalry forces, required to implement his operational approach.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Historians have largely agreed that Pemberton should shoulder the blame for the poor Confederate performance during the Vicksburg campaign. General consensus exists among American Civil War historians that Pemberton proved a confused, indecisive, and incompetent commander and his poor leadership led to the Confederate defeat. However, an examination of the Vicksburg campaign conducted at the operational level of war shows that throughout the campaign, Pemberton led a capable and competent defense not just of Vicksburg, but of the Mississippi Department he commanded. He relied on an operational approach that involved fighting from prepared defensive positions in favorable terrain deep in his own territory and anchored by natural obstacles. To attack such a position, Pemberton knew an opponent would need a large force operating over an extended line of communications (LOC). Pemberton intended to interdict his opponent’s LOC using a strong cavalry force, thus preventing the enemy from achieving the offensive momentum necessary to break through Vicksburg’s defenses. This was a sound operational approach. However, it failed because of an ineffective Confederate command structure that, among other failures, denied Pemberton the resources, particularly adequate cavalry forces, required to implement his operational approach.

More books from Golden Springs Publishing

Cover of the book African American Sailors: Their Role In Helping The Union To Win The Civil War by Major Malcolm G. Haynes
Cover of the book George Washington: America's First Strategic Leader by Major Malcolm G. Haynes
Cover of the book A History Of The Organizational Development Of The Continental Artillery During The American Revolution by Major Malcolm G. Haynes
Cover of the book The Confederate Army, A Regiment: An Analysis Of The Forty-Eighth Tennessee Volunteer Infantry Regiment, 1861-1865 by Major Malcolm G. Haynes
Cover of the book Engineer Battlefield Functions At Chancellorsville by Major Malcolm G. Haynes
Cover of the book Advance And Retreat: Personal Experiences In The United States And Confederate States Armies [Illustrated Edition] by Major Malcolm G. Haynes
Cover of the book Yankee In Gray: The Civil War Memoirs Of Henry E. Handerson by Major Malcolm G. Haynes
Cover of the book Desertion During The Civil War by Major Malcolm G. Haynes
Cover of the book Analysis Of The Relationship Between Technology And Strategy And How They Shaped The Confederate States Navy [Illustrated Edition] by Major Malcolm G. Haynes
Cover of the book Father Struck It Rich by Major Malcolm G. Haynes
Cover of the book Night Comes To The Cumberlands: A Biography Of A Depressed Area by Major Malcolm G. Haynes
Cover of the book Dragoon Or Cavalryman, Major General John Buford In The American Civil War [Illustrated Edition] by Major Malcolm G. Haynes
Cover of the book Rosecrans’ Staff At Chickamauga by Major Malcolm G. Haynes
Cover of the book Confederate Command During The Fort Henry-Fort Donelson Campaign, February 1862 by Major Malcolm G. Haynes
Cover of the book “Worthy Of His Sufferings”: How Strategic Leaders Learned From Failure by Major Malcolm G. Haynes
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy