Reevaluation Of Pemberton At Vicksburg

Nonfiction, History, Modern, 19th Century, Americas, United States, Civil War Period (1850-1877), Military
Cover of the book Reevaluation Of Pemberton At Vicksburg by Major Malcolm G. Haynes, Golden Springs Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Major Malcolm G. Haynes ISBN: 9781786253002
Publisher: Golden Springs Publishing Publication: November 6, 2015
Imprint: Golden Springs Publishing Language: English
Author: Major Malcolm G. Haynes
ISBN: 9781786253002
Publisher: Golden Springs Publishing
Publication: November 6, 2015
Imprint: Golden Springs Publishing
Language: English

Historians have largely agreed that Pemberton should shoulder the blame for the poor Confederate performance during the Vicksburg campaign. General consensus exists among American Civil War historians that Pemberton proved a confused, indecisive, and incompetent commander and his poor leadership led to the Confederate defeat. However, an examination of the Vicksburg campaign conducted at the operational level of war shows that throughout the campaign, Pemberton led a capable and competent defense not just of Vicksburg, but of the Mississippi Department he commanded. He relied on an operational approach that involved fighting from prepared defensive positions in favorable terrain deep in his own territory and anchored by natural obstacles. To attack such a position, Pemberton knew an opponent would need a large force operating over an extended line of communications (LOC). Pemberton intended to interdict his opponent’s LOC using a strong cavalry force, thus preventing the enemy from achieving the offensive momentum necessary to break through Vicksburg’s defenses. This was a sound operational approach. However, it failed because of an ineffective Confederate command structure that, among other failures, denied Pemberton the resources, particularly adequate cavalry forces, required to implement his operational approach.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Historians have largely agreed that Pemberton should shoulder the blame for the poor Confederate performance during the Vicksburg campaign. General consensus exists among American Civil War historians that Pemberton proved a confused, indecisive, and incompetent commander and his poor leadership led to the Confederate defeat. However, an examination of the Vicksburg campaign conducted at the operational level of war shows that throughout the campaign, Pemberton led a capable and competent defense not just of Vicksburg, but of the Mississippi Department he commanded. He relied on an operational approach that involved fighting from prepared defensive positions in favorable terrain deep in his own territory and anchored by natural obstacles. To attack such a position, Pemberton knew an opponent would need a large force operating over an extended line of communications (LOC). Pemberton intended to interdict his opponent’s LOC using a strong cavalry force, thus preventing the enemy from achieving the offensive momentum necessary to break through Vicksburg’s defenses. This was a sound operational approach. However, it failed because of an ineffective Confederate command structure that, among other failures, denied Pemberton the resources, particularly adequate cavalry forces, required to implement his operational approach.

More books from Golden Springs Publishing

Cover of the book From The Cannon’s Mouth: The Civil War Letters Of General Alpheus S. Williams by Major Malcolm G. Haynes
Cover of the book Militiaman To Regular: The Training Of The American Soldier 1763 – 1783 by Major Malcolm G. Haynes
Cover of the book Houdini: The Man Who Walked Through Walls by Major Malcolm G. Haynes
Cover of the book Chickamauga: Bloody Battle In The West by Major Malcolm G. Haynes
Cover of the book The Union’s Naval War In Louisiana, 1861-1863 by Major Malcolm G. Haynes
Cover of the book The Gettysburg Campaign, June-July 1863 [Illustrated Edition] by Major Malcolm G. Haynes
Cover of the book Comparison Of Initiative During The 1864 Virginia Overland Campaign by Major Malcolm G. Haynes
Cover of the book The Effects Of Southern Railroads On Interior Lines During The Civil War by Major Malcolm G. Haynes
Cover of the book The Faults Of The Generals: How Great Britain Lost The War For America by Major Malcolm G. Haynes
Cover of the book Memoirs Of The Confederate War For Independence [Illustrated Edition] by Major Malcolm G. Haynes
Cover of the book The Failure of the "New Economics": An Analysis of the Keynesian Fallacies by Major Malcolm G. Haynes
Cover of the book The Long Arm of Lee: The History of the Artillery of the Army of Northern Virginia, Volume 1 by Major Malcolm G. Haynes
Cover of the book The Fathers by Major Malcolm G. Haynes
Cover of the book On Command: An Illustrative Study Of Command And Control In The Army Of Northern Virginia, 1863 by Major Malcolm G. Haynes
Cover of the book The Autobiography of Upton Sinclair by Major Malcolm G. Haynes
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy