Religion, Science, and Democracy

A Disputational Friendship

Nonfiction, Religion & Spirituality, Christianity, Church, Church & State, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, Government, Democracy
Cover of the book Religion, Science, and Democracy by Lisa L. Stenmark, Lexington Books
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Lisa L. Stenmark ISBN: 9780739142882
Publisher: Lexington Books Publication: March 8, 2013
Imprint: Lexington Books Language: English
Author: Lisa L. Stenmark
ISBN: 9780739142882
Publisher: Lexington Books
Publication: March 8, 2013
Imprint: Lexington Books
Language: English

Despite the increasing popularity of “religion and science” as an academic discourse, the intersection of science and religion remains a front line in an ongoing “culture war.” The reasons for this lie in an approach to discourse that closely resembles the model of discourse promoted by John Rawls, in which plural discourse —such as between religion and science— is based on a foundation of shared beliefs and established facts. This leads to a “doctrines and discoveries” approach to the relationship of religion and science, which focuses on their respective truth claims in an attempt to find areas of agreement. This framework inherently privileges scientific perspectives, which actually increases conflict between religion and science, and undermines public discourse by inserting absolutes into it. To the extent that the science and religion discourse adopts this approach, it inadvertently increases the conflict between religion and science and limits our ability to address matters of public concern.

This book suggests an alternative model for discourse, a disputational friendship, based on the work of Hannah Arendt. This approach recognizes the role that authorities —and thus religion and science— play in public life, but undermines any attempt to privilege a particular authority, because it promotes the position of the storyteller, who never settles on a single story but always seeks to incorporate many particular stories into her account. A disputational friendship promotes storytelling not by seeking agreement, but by exploring areas of disagreement in order to create the space for more conversations and to generate more stories and additional interpretations. Successful discourse between religion and science is not measured by its ability to determine “truth” or “fact,” but by its ability to continually expand the discourse and promote public life and public judgment.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Despite the increasing popularity of “religion and science” as an academic discourse, the intersection of science and religion remains a front line in an ongoing “culture war.” The reasons for this lie in an approach to discourse that closely resembles the model of discourse promoted by John Rawls, in which plural discourse —such as between religion and science— is based on a foundation of shared beliefs and established facts. This leads to a “doctrines and discoveries” approach to the relationship of religion and science, which focuses on their respective truth claims in an attempt to find areas of agreement. This framework inherently privileges scientific perspectives, which actually increases conflict between religion and science, and undermines public discourse by inserting absolutes into it. To the extent that the science and religion discourse adopts this approach, it inadvertently increases the conflict between religion and science and limits our ability to address matters of public concern.

This book suggests an alternative model for discourse, a disputational friendship, based on the work of Hannah Arendt. This approach recognizes the role that authorities —and thus religion and science— play in public life, but undermines any attempt to privilege a particular authority, because it promotes the position of the storyteller, who never settles on a single story but always seeks to incorporate many particular stories into her account. A disputational friendship promotes storytelling not by seeking agreement, but by exploring areas of disagreement in order to create the space for more conversations and to generate more stories and additional interpretations. Successful discourse between religion and science is not measured by its ability to determine “truth” or “fact,” but by its ability to continually expand the discourse and promote public life and public judgment.

More books from Lexington Books

Cover of the book Confronting Disaster by Lisa L. Stenmark
Cover of the book Delimiting Modernities by Lisa L. Stenmark
Cover of the book Theory and Method in Historical Ethnomusicology by Lisa L. Stenmark
Cover of the book The Vital Roots of European Enlightenment by Lisa L. Stenmark
Cover of the book Thinking about Animals in the Age of the Anthropocene by Lisa L. Stenmark
Cover of the book Communicative Sexualities by Lisa L. Stenmark
Cover of the book Agamben and the Signature of Astrology by Lisa L. Stenmark
Cover of the book Nation States by Lisa L. Stenmark
Cover of the book The Article V Amendatory Constitutional Convention by Lisa L. Stenmark
Cover of the book Literary Worlds and Deleuze by Lisa L. Stenmark
Cover of the book The EU and the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict 1971–2013 by Lisa L. Stenmark
Cover of the book Underserved Communities and Digital Discourse by Lisa L. Stenmark
Cover of the book The Good Life and the Greater Good in a Global Context by Lisa L. Stenmark
Cover of the book Stepping Out of the Brain Drain by Lisa L. Stenmark
Cover of the book Indigenous Knowledge and Development by Lisa L. Stenmark
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy