Security in the 21st century: US and European responses to global terrorism

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, International, International Security
Cover of the book Security in the 21st century: US and European responses to global terrorism by Patrick Wagner, GRIN Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Patrick Wagner ISBN: 9783638310932
Publisher: GRIN Publishing Publication: October 2, 2004
Imprint: GRIN Publishing Language: English
Author: Patrick Wagner
ISBN: 9783638310932
Publisher: GRIN Publishing
Publication: October 2, 2004
Imprint: GRIN Publishing
Language: English

Master's Thesis from the year 2004 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: Peace and Conflict Studies, Security, grade: 2 (B), University of Kent (Brussels School of International Studies), 64 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: Although the world stood united behind America when the dust of the collapsed twin towers of the World Trade Centre settled, differences between the United States and Europe soon became apparent. Europe might have supported the US in Afghanistan, both politically and militarily, but diverging interests already became apparent when the US sidelined NATO and preferred to lead 'Operation Enduring Freedom' itself. The dispute escalated over the US plans to continue the war on terror in Iraq. Here, it emerged that the US and Europe do not share the same world view. While the US seem to perceive the world in Hobbesian terms, and believe that military strength is the only means to achieve security, Europe appears to understand security in the Kantian sense and believes that 'perpetual peace' can be achieved. The question that divided Europe and the US over Iraq then is more than a simple difference of opinion but reflects a deep philosophical division: Can global security be achieved by force or through sustained dedication to a set of normative principles implemented by the world community? Consequently, the counterterrorism strategies formulated in Europe and the US are of a fundamentally different nature, which cannot be explained merely by the discrepancy in military capabilities. If that would be the case, Europe would have begun to build up its military potential by now. Acknowledging that 'terrorism has become one of the most pressing political problems,' (David Whittaker) the aim of this paper is to compare the US and the European approach to global terrorism, establish reasons for the differences and evaluate which approach might be more effective. As September 11, has changed our perception of security by demonstrating that even the US is, despite its unrivalled military superiority, vulnerable to attack, carried out by just 19 men armed with cardboard cutters, we should remain aware that the responses we chose to these attacks reflect our dedication to human rights, the rule of law and indeed freedom. Relying on military strength is easier than to acknowledge that terrorism is caused by a fundamentally unjust economical and political world order that markedly favours the West, yet it might ultimately prove to become more dangerous than terrorism itself, as it does nothing to resolve the problem but reinforces the world order that is the cause of the problem.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Master's Thesis from the year 2004 in the subject Politics - International Politics - Topic: Peace and Conflict Studies, Security, grade: 2 (B), University of Kent (Brussels School of International Studies), 64 entries in the bibliography, language: English, abstract: Although the world stood united behind America when the dust of the collapsed twin towers of the World Trade Centre settled, differences between the United States and Europe soon became apparent. Europe might have supported the US in Afghanistan, both politically and militarily, but diverging interests already became apparent when the US sidelined NATO and preferred to lead 'Operation Enduring Freedom' itself. The dispute escalated over the US plans to continue the war on terror in Iraq. Here, it emerged that the US and Europe do not share the same world view. While the US seem to perceive the world in Hobbesian terms, and believe that military strength is the only means to achieve security, Europe appears to understand security in the Kantian sense and believes that 'perpetual peace' can be achieved. The question that divided Europe and the US over Iraq then is more than a simple difference of opinion but reflects a deep philosophical division: Can global security be achieved by force or through sustained dedication to a set of normative principles implemented by the world community? Consequently, the counterterrorism strategies formulated in Europe and the US are of a fundamentally different nature, which cannot be explained merely by the discrepancy in military capabilities. If that would be the case, Europe would have begun to build up its military potential by now. Acknowledging that 'terrorism has become one of the most pressing political problems,' (David Whittaker) the aim of this paper is to compare the US and the European approach to global terrorism, establish reasons for the differences and evaluate which approach might be more effective. As September 11, has changed our perception of security by demonstrating that even the US is, despite its unrivalled military superiority, vulnerable to attack, carried out by just 19 men armed with cardboard cutters, we should remain aware that the responses we chose to these attacks reflect our dedication to human rights, the rule of law and indeed freedom. Relying on military strength is easier than to acknowledge that terrorism is caused by a fundamentally unjust economical and political world order that markedly favours the West, yet it might ultimately prove to become more dangerous than terrorism itself, as it does nothing to resolve the problem but reinforces the world order that is the cause of the problem.

More books from GRIN Publishing

Cover of the book Der Ingelheimer Oberhof by Patrick Wagner
Cover of the book Industrialisierungsansätze am Beispiel von Vietnam und Malaysia by Patrick Wagner
Cover of the book 'Wuthering Heights' and Victorian values by Patrick Wagner
Cover of the book The Trend towards Corporate Voluntary Disclosures by Patrick Wagner
Cover of the book Individual vs. Society in Ken Kessey's Novel and Film 'One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest' by Patrick Wagner
Cover of the book What are the differences between the academic and the political view on international terrorism? by Patrick Wagner
Cover of the book Europe's Influence on Ukrainian State Building - A Struggle for Identity between Europe and Russia by Patrick Wagner
Cover of the book Treatments for BPD (Borderline Personality Disorder). An Annotated Bibliography by Patrick Wagner
Cover of the book E-Mailschreiben in der Grundschule by Patrick Wagner
Cover of the book Development aid and transformation process in Africa by Patrick Wagner
Cover of the book The Political Economy of the Korean Industrialisation by Patrick Wagner
Cover of the book The family group conference as a means of decision-making in matters of adult guardianship by Patrick Wagner
Cover of the book Impact of location-based services on consumers' buying behaviour, illustrated by the German market by Patrick Wagner
Cover of the book Selbstreflexivität im Film am Beispiel von Jean-Luc Godards 'À bout de souffle' by Patrick Wagner
Cover of the book Are the 4 P's of international marketing of equal importance to all firms? What factors might cause some to more or less important than others? by Patrick Wagner
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy