Smokescreen

The US, NATO and the Illegitimate Use of Force

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, Politics, Civil Rights
Cover of the book Smokescreen by Paul F.J.  Aranas, Algora Publishing
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Paul F.J. Aranas ISBN: 9780875868967
Publisher: Algora Publishing Publication: December 15, 2009
Imprint: Algora Publishing Language: English
Author: Paul F.J. Aranas
ISBN: 9780875868967
Publisher: Algora Publishing
Publication: December 15, 2009
Imprint: Algora Publishing
Language: English
When is it legitimate for nations to use force?

The United States and NATO regularly employ the illegitimate use of force, using false arguments and a haze of purported altruistic justifications to justify their actions. But objective standards to legitimacy exist, and those standards are enshrined in the United Nations Charter.

“Smokescreen” analyzes the workings and legitimacy of the United Nations Security Council, and shows how the United States and NATO governments systematically create the false perception of legitimacy for the use of force. Whenever they cannot meet the standard, they simply employ alternative norm justifications of self-defense beyond the scope of Article 51 and humanitarian intervention.

Max Weber’s definition of legitimacy, ‘legitimitätsglaube’ or the belief in legitimacy, has been widely used by social scientists. Unlike moral philosophers, social scientists favor empirical data; therefore, for them, measuring legitimacy becomes possible by measuring what people believe to be legitimate. In this framework the powerful have the ability to manipulate public opinion to create legitimacy for a particular action. The author argues that this is not legitimacy but merely a perception of legitimacy to justify aggression.

David Beetham maintains that Weber’s definition is a catastrophe, and in its place he offers a formula for legitimacy based on the objective criteria of legality, shared beliefs between dominant and subordinate, and consent from at least the most significant subordinate actors. This book argues that the United Nations Security Council, backed by the UN Charter, holds real legitimacy based on Beetham’s formula. Meanwhile, the U.S. education system and mass media largely ignore the history and principles of the United Nations.

The book offers a way forward toward international peace and security, in both the interests of Western countries and humanity as a whole.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
When is it legitimate for nations to use force?

The United States and NATO regularly employ the illegitimate use of force, using false arguments and a haze of purported altruistic justifications to justify their actions. But objective standards to legitimacy exist, and those standards are enshrined in the United Nations Charter.

“Smokescreen” analyzes the workings and legitimacy of the United Nations Security Council, and shows how the United States and NATO governments systematically create the false perception of legitimacy for the use of force. Whenever they cannot meet the standard, they simply employ alternative norm justifications of self-defense beyond the scope of Article 51 and humanitarian intervention.

Max Weber’s definition of legitimacy, ‘legitimitätsglaube’ or the belief in legitimacy, has been widely used by social scientists. Unlike moral philosophers, social scientists favor empirical data; therefore, for them, measuring legitimacy becomes possible by measuring what people believe to be legitimate. In this framework the powerful have the ability to manipulate public opinion to create legitimacy for a particular action. The author argues that this is not legitimacy but merely a perception of legitimacy to justify aggression.

David Beetham maintains that Weber’s definition is a catastrophe, and in its place he offers a formula for legitimacy based on the objective criteria of legality, shared beliefs between dominant and subordinate, and consent from at least the most significant subordinate actors. This book argues that the United Nations Security Council, backed by the UN Charter, holds real legitimacy based on Beetham’s formula. Meanwhile, the U.S. education system and mass media largely ignore the history and principles of the United Nations.

The book offers a way forward toward international peace and security, in both the interests of Western countries and humanity as a whole.

More books from Algora Publishing

Cover of the book 25 Doctrines of Law You Should Know by Paul F.J.  Aranas
Cover of the book World Government - Utopian Dream or Current Reality? by Paul F.J.  Aranas
Cover of the book On Love by Paul F.J.  Aranas
Cover of the book The Making of the Slave Class by Paul F.J.  Aranas
Cover of the book The Brilliant Reign of the Kangxi Emperor by Paul F.J.  Aranas
Cover of the book Starter Home by Paul F.J.  Aranas
Cover of the book A Brief Introduction to Piaget by Paul F.J.  Aranas
Cover of the book Ice Age Extinction by Paul F.J.  Aranas
Cover of the book On Strength by Paul F.J.  Aranas
Cover of the book Hatshepsut, Queen of Sheba by Paul F.J.  Aranas
Cover of the book Orion's Guiding Stars by Paul F.J.  Aranas
Cover of the book Abe Lincoln’s Secret War Against The North by Paul F.J.  Aranas
Cover of the book A Brave Man Stands Firm: The Historic Battles of Chief Justice Marshall and President Jefferson by Paul F.J.  Aranas
Cover of the book The Ramessides, Medes and Persians by Paul F.J.  Aranas
Cover of the book The Mystery of Human Aging by Paul F.J.  Aranas
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy