Studies in the Textual Tradition of Terence

Nonfiction, Entertainment, Performing Arts, Theatre, History & Criticism, Fiction & Literature, Literary Theory & Criticism, Ancient & Classical
Cover of the book Studies in the Textual Tradition of Terence by John N. Grant, University of Toronto Press, Scholarly Publishing Division
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: John N. Grant ISBN: 9781487597825
Publisher: University of Toronto Press, Scholarly Publishing Division Publication: December 15, 1986
Imprint: Language: English
Author: John N. Grant
ISBN: 9781487597825
Publisher: University of Toronto Press, Scholarly Publishing Division
Publication: December 15, 1986
Imprint:
Language: English

The textual tradition of the Latin dramatist Publius Terentius Afer (second century BC) is unusually rich and complex. Over six hundred manuscripts containing some or all of Terence's six comedies have survived, but only one codex and three small fragments date from antiquity. All the rest were copied in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance when Terence was very popular. Recently scholars have been devoting considerable study to the role of his works and the commentaries on them in the cultural and intellectual development of the Middle Ages and the Renaissance. However, little attention has been given to an examination and re-examination of the manuscripts in order to determine which are the most useful for establishing a reliable text of the plays.

In this study John N. Grant examines afresh the manuscript tradition of the comedies, looking in particular at a branch of the medieval manuscripts which has been neglected in the past. He establishes the primacy of one manuscript, the value of which has hitherto been disputed, and points out the importance of others which have been known but have been neglected by past editors of Terence. In addition, through a careful study of the cycle of illustrations that appear in some medieval manuscripts he brings under scrutiny the history of the transmission of the text in late antiquity. He shows that, contrary to the generally held view, the date of the original cycle of illustrations from which those in the medieval manuscripts are derived cannot be used to provide a chronological keystone for the lost ancient manuscripts which were the ancestors of the surviving witnesses.

An appendix with a selection of readings from over 150 manuscripts will be of value to those interested in investigating further the relationships among the extant manuscripts.

This study lays the foundation for a new edition of the plays of Terence.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

The textual tradition of the Latin dramatist Publius Terentius Afer (second century BC) is unusually rich and complex. Over six hundred manuscripts containing some or all of Terence's six comedies have survived, but only one codex and three small fragments date from antiquity. All the rest were copied in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance when Terence was very popular. Recently scholars have been devoting considerable study to the role of his works and the commentaries on them in the cultural and intellectual development of the Middle Ages and the Renaissance. However, little attention has been given to an examination and re-examination of the manuscripts in order to determine which are the most useful for establishing a reliable text of the plays.

In this study John N. Grant examines afresh the manuscript tradition of the comedies, looking in particular at a branch of the medieval manuscripts which has been neglected in the past. He establishes the primacy of one manuscript, the value of which has hitherto been disputed, and points out the importance of others which have been known but have been neglected by past editors of Terence. In addition, through a careful study of the cycle of illustrations that appear in some medieval manuscripts he brings under scrutiny the history of the transmission of the text in late antiquity. He shows that, contrary to the generally held view, the date of the original cycle of illustrations from which those in the medieval manuscripts are derived cannot be used to provide a chronological keystone for the lost ancient manuscripts which were the ancestors of the surviving witnesses.

An appendix with a selection of readings from over 150 manuscripts will be of value to those interested in investigating further the relationships among the extant manuscripts.

This study lays the foundation for a new edition of the plays of Terence.

More books from University of Toronto Press, Scholarly Publishing Division

Cover of the book Hobbes and America by John N. Grant
Cover of the book Hunting the 1918 Flu by John N. Grant
Cover of the book The People's House of Commons by John N. Grant
Cover of the book William Lyon Mackenzie King, Volume II, 1924-1932 by John N. Grant
Cover of the book Henry Alline by John N. Grant
Cover of the book The Promise of Schooling by John N. Grant
Cover of the book Collected Works of Erasmus by John N. Grant
Cover of the book Land, Stewardship, and Legitimacy by John N. Grant
Cover of the book Insight by John N. Grant
Cover of the book Civic Symbol by John N. Grant
Cover of the book Courts and Trials by John N. Grant
Cover of the book Desiring Canada by John N. Grant
Cover of the book The Butterflies of Canada by John N. Grant
Cover of the book The Empire of the St. Lawrence by John N. Grant
Cover of the book The Right Relationship by John N. Grant
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy