Television Courtroom Broadcasting Effects
The Empirical Research and the Supreme Court Challenge
Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Media & the Law, Courts, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science
| Author: | Paul Lambert | ISBN: | 9780761860068 |
| Publisher: | UPA | Publication: | July 5, 2013 |
| Imprint: | UPA | Language: | English |
| Author: | Paul Lambert |
| ISBN: | 9780761860068 |
| Publisher: | UPA |
| Publication: | July 5, 2013 |
| Imprint: | UPA |
| Language: | English |
Court and policy makers have increasingly had to deal with—and sometimes even embrace—technology, from podcasts to the Internet. Televised courtroom broadcasting especially remains an issue. The debate surrounding the US Supreme Court and federal courts, as well as the great disparity between different forms of television courtroom broadcasting, rages on. What are the effects of television courtroom broadcasting? Does research support the arguments for or against? Despite three Supreme Court cases on television courtroom broadcasting, the common thread between the cases has not been highlighted. The Supreme Court in these cases maintains a common theme: there is not a sufficient body of research on the effects of televising courtroom proceedings to resolve the debate in a confident manner.
Court and policy makers have increasingly had to deal with—and sometimes even embrace—technology, from podcasts to the Internet. Televised courtroom broadcasting especially remains an issue. The debate surrounding the US Supreme Court and federal courts, as well as the great disparity between different forms of television courtroom broadcasting, rages on. What are the effects of television courtroom broadcasting? Does research support the arguments for or against? Despite three Supreme Court cases on television courtroom broadcasting, the common thread between the cases has not been highlighted. The Supreme Court in these cases maintains a common theme: there is not a sufficient body of research on the effects of televising courtroom proceedings to resolve the debate in a confident manner.
