The Ambivalence of Good

Human Rights in International Politics since the 1940s

Nonfiction, History, Modern, 20th Century, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science
Cover of the book The Ambivalence of Good by Jan Eckel, OUP Oxford
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Jan Eckel ISBN: 9780191086113
Publisher: OUP Oxford Publication: April 11, 2019
Imprint: OUP Oxford Language: English
Author: Jan Eckel
ISBN: 9780191086113
Publisher: OUP Oxford
Publication: April 11, 2019
Imprint: OUP Oxford
Language: English

The Ambivalence of Good examines the genesis and evolution of international human rights politics since the 1940s. Focusing on key developments such as the shaping of the UN human rights system, decolonization, the rise of Amnesty International, the campaigns against the Pinochet dictatorship, the moral politics of Western governments, or dissidence in Eastern Europe, the book traces how human rights profoundly, if subtly, transformed global affairs. Moving beyond monocausal explanations and narratives prioritizing one particular decade, such as the 1940s or the 1970s, The Ambivalence of Good argues that we need a complex and nuanced interpretation if we want to understand the truly global reach of human rights, and account for the hopes, conflicts, and interventions to which this idea gave rise. Thus, it portrays the story of human rights as polycentric, demonstrating how actors in various locales imbued them with widely different meanings, arguing that the political field evolved in a fitful and discontinuous process. This process was shaped by consequential shifts that emerged from the search for a new world order during the Second World War, decolonization, the desire to introduce a new political morality into world affairs during the 1970s, and the visions of a peaceful international order after the end of the Cold War. Finally, the book stresses that the projects pursued in the name of human rights nonetheless proved highly ambivalent. Self-interest was as strong a driving force as was the desire to help people in need, and while international campaigns often improved the fate of the persecuted, they were equally likely to have counterproductive effects. The Ambivalence of Good provides the first research-based synopsis of the topic and one of the first synthetic studies of a transnational political field (such as population, health, or the environment) during the twentieth century. Based on archival research in six countries, it breaks new empirical ground concerning the history of human rights in the United Nations, of human rights NGOs, of far-flung mobilizations, and of the uses of human rights in state foreign policy.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

The Ambivalence of Good examines the genesis and evolution of international human rights politics since the 1940s. Focusing on key developments such as the shaping of the UN human rights system, decolonization, the rise of Amnesty International, the campaigns against the Pinochet dictatorship, the moral politics of Western governments, or dissidence in Eastern Europe, the book traces how human rights profoundly, if subtly, transformed global affairs. Moving beyond monocausal explanations and narratives prioritizing one particular decade, such as the 1940s or the 1970s, The Ambivalence of Good argues that we need a complex and nuanced interpretation if we want to understand the truly global reach of human rights, and account for the hopes, conflicts, and interventions to which this idea gave rise. Thus, it portrays the story of human rights as polycentric, demonstrating how actors in various locales imbued them with widely different meanings, arguing that the political field evolved in a fitful and discontinuous process. This process was shaped by consequential shifts that emerged from the search for a new world order during the Second World War, decolonization, the desire to introduce a new political morality into world affairs during the 1970s, and the visions of a peaceful international order after the end of the Cold War. Finally, the book stresses that the projects pursued in the name of human rights nonetheless proved highly ambivalent. Self-interest was as strong a driving force as was the desire to help people in need, and while international campaigns often improved the fate of the persecuted, they were equally likely to have counterproductive effects. The Ambivalence of Good provides the first research-based synopsis of the topic and one of the first synthetic studies of a transnational political field (such as population, health, or the environment) during the twentieth century. Based on archival research in six countries, it breaks new empirical ground concerning the history of human rights in the United Nations, of human rights NGOs, of far-flung mobilizations, and of the uses of human rights in state foreign policy.

More books from OUP Oxford

Cover of the book Does Anything Really Matter? by Jan Eckel
Cover of the book Translational Dynamics and Magnetic Resonance by Jan Eckel
Cover of the book Prisoners, Solitude, and Time by Jan Eckel
Cover of the book Prayer after Augustine by Jan Eckel
Cover of the book Clinical Psychology: A Very Short Introduction by Jan Eckel
Cover of the book The Leadership Capital Index by Jan Eckel
Cover of the book Terrorism in Asymmetrical Conflict by Jan Eckel
Cover of the book On Life and Death by Jan Eckel
Cover of the book A Government that Worked Better and Cost Less?: Evaluating Three Decades of Reform and Change in UK Central Government by Jan Eckel
Cover of the book Collective Emotions by Jan Eckel
Cover of the book Multi-Level Electoral Politics by Jan Eckel
Cover of the book Heartthrobs by Jan Eckel
Cover of the book Dystopia by Jan Eckel
Cover of the book Consumption and the Country House by Jan Eckel
Cover of the book Selfhood and the Soul by Jan Eckel
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy