The Company They Keep

How Partisan Divisions Came to the Supreme Court

Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Constitutional, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, Government, Democracy
Cover of the book The Company They Keep by Neal Devins, Lawrence Baum, Oxford University Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Neal Devins, Lawrence Baum ISBN: 9780190278076
Publisher: Oxford University Press Publication: January 7, 2019
Imprint: Oxford University Press Language: English
Author: Neal Devins, Lawrence Baum
ISBN: 9780190278076
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Publication: January 7, 2019
Imprint: Oxford University Press
Language: English

Are Supreme Court justices swayed by the political environment that surrounds them? Most people think "yes," and they point to the influence of the general public and the other branches of government on the Court. It is not that simple, however. As the eminent law and politics scholars Neal Devins and Lawrence Baum show in The Company They Keep, justices today are reacting far more to subtle social forces in their own elite legal world than to pressure from the other branches of government or mass public opinion. In particular, the authors draw from social psychology research to show why Justices are apt to follow the lead of the elite social networks that they are a part of. The evidence is strong: Justices take cues primarily from the people who are closest to them and whose approval they care most about: political, social, and professional elites. In an era of strong partisan polarization, elite social networks are largely bifurcated by partisan and ideological loyalties, and the Justices reflect that division. The result is a Court in which the Justices' ideological stances reflect the dominant views in the appointing president's party. Justices such as Clarence Thomas and Ruth Bader Ginsburg live largely in a milieu populated by like-minded elites. Today's partisanship on the Court also stems from the emergence of conservative legal networks such as the Federalist Society, that reinforce the conservative leanings of Republican appointees. For the Warren and Burger Courts, elite social networks were dominated by liberal elites and not divided by political party or ideology. A fascinating examination of the factors that shape decision-making, The Company They Keep will reshape our understanding of how political polarization occurs on the contemporary Supreme Court.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Are Supreme Court justices swayed by the political environment that surrounds them? Most people think "yes," and they point to the influence of the general public and the other branches of government on the Court. It is not that simple, however. As the eminent law and politics scholars Neal Devins and Lawrence Baum show in The Company They Keep, justices today are reacting far more to subtle social forces in their own elite legal world than to pressure from the other branches of government or mass public opinion. In particular, the authors draw from social psychology research to show why Justices are apt to follow the lead of the elite social networks that they are a part of. The evidence is strong: Justices take cues primarily from the people who are closest to them and whose approval they care most about: political, social, and professional elites. In an era of strong partisan polarization, elite social networks are largely bifurcated by partisan and ideological loyalties, and the Justices reflect that division. The result is a Court in which the Justices' ideological stances reflect the dominant views in the appointing president's party. Justices such as Clarence Thomas and Ruth Bader Ginsburg live largely in a milieu populated by like-minded elites. Today's partisanship on the Court also stems from the emergence of conservative legal networks such as the Federalist Society, that reinforce the conservative leanings of Republican appointees. For the Warren and Burger Courts, elite social networks were dominated by liberal elites and not divided by political party or ideology. A fascinating examination of the factors that shape decision-making, The Company They Keep will reshape our understanding of how political polarization occurs on the contemporary Supreme Court.

More books from Oxford University Press

Cover of the book From Truth to Technique at Trial by Neal Devins, Lawrence Baum
Cover of the book Moral Skepticisms by Neal Devins, Lawrence Baum
Cover of the book Prevention vs. Treatment by Neal Devins, Lawrence Baum
Cover of the book Brotherhood Of Kings : How International Relations Shaped The Ancient Near East by Neal Devins, Lawrence Baum
Cover of the book A Study of History by Neal Devins, Lawrence Baum
Cover of the book Foreign Affairs Federalism by Neal Devins, Lawrence Baum
Cover of the book Tools for Innovation by Neal Devins, Lawrence Baum
Cover of the book The Aesthetic Brain by Neal Devins, Lawrence Baum
Cover of the book Ethics at the Edges of Law by Neal Devins, Lawrence Baum
Cover of the book Unusually Cruel by Neal Devins, Lawrence Baum
Cover of the book Following Hadrian : A Second-Century Journey through the Roman Empire by Neal Devins, Lawrence Baum
Cover of the book Coping Effectively With Spinal Cord Injuries by Neal Devins, Lawrence Baum
Cover of the book Memoranda During the War by Neal Devins, Lawrence Baum
Cover of the book We Changed the World by Neal Devins, Lawrence Baum
Cover of the book Minetown, Milltown, Railtown by Neal Devins, Lawrence Baum
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy