The Concept of Contraction in Giordano Bruno's Philosophy

Nonfiction, Religion & Spirituality, Philosophy
Cover of the book The Concept of Contraction in Giordano Bruno's Philosophy by Leo Catana, Taylor and Francis
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Leo Catana ISBN: 9781351892452
Publisher: Taylor and Francis Publication: September 8, 2017
Imprint: Routledge Language: English
Author: Leo Catana
ISBN: 9781351892452
Publisher: Taylor and Francis
Publication: September 8, 2017
Imprint: Routledge
Language: English

Through the concept of contraction, Giordano Bruno (1548-1600) endeavoured to explain the relationship of God to his Creation in a way that conformed with his pantheistic view of nature as well as his heterodox view of man’s relationship to God. The concept of contraction is twofold. In the ontological sense it denotes the way in which the One, or God, descends to multiplicity. In the noetic sense it accounts for the ways in which the individual human soul ascends towards God through a reversed process of contemplation. Bruno denied the efficacy of the several psychical, psychological and medical states traditionally thought to aid contemplation and noetic ascent towards God. In his view the only means was philosophical contemplation, the use of memory being one important form. Philosophical contemplation elevated the mind from the fragmented multiplicity of sense impressions to an understanding of the principles governing the sensible world. This publication is the first book-length study dedicated to concept of contraction in Bruno’s philosophy. Moreover, it explores his sources for this concept. Traditionally Ficino’s translation of Plotinus, dating from the second half of the fifteenth century, has been seen as a key source to the Neoplatonism informing Bruno’s philosophy. In The Concept of Contraction in Giordano Bruno’s Philosophy another Neoplatonic source is considered, namely the pseudo-Aristotelian Liber de Causis (Book of causes), which has not yet been examined in the context of Renaissance Neoplatonism. This work, probably written in Arabic in the ninth century, was translated into Latin in the twelfth century and remained well known to many late Medieval and Renaissance philosophers. Catana argues that this work may have prepared for Ficino’s translation of Plotinus, and that in some instances it provided a common source to Renaissance philosophers, Bruno and Nicholas of Cusa (1401-1464) being conspicuous examples discussed in this book.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Through the concept of contraction, Giordano Bruno (1548-1600) endeavoured to explain the relationship of God to his Creation in a way that conformed with his pantheistic view of nature as well as his heterodox view of man’s relationship to God. The concept of contraction is twofold. In the ontological sense it denotes the way in which the One, or God, descends to multiplicity. In the noetic sense it accounts for the ways in which the individual human soul ascends towards God through a reversed process of contemplation. Bruno denied the efficacy of the several psychical, psychological and medical states traditionally thought to aid contemplation and noetic ascent towards God. In his view the only means was philosophical contemplation, the use of memory being one important form. Philosophical contemplation elevated the mind from the fragmented multiplicity of sense impressions to an understanding of the principles governing the sensible world. This publication is the first book-length study dedicated to concept of contraction in Bruno’s philosophy. Moreover, it explores his sources for this concept. Traditionally Ficino’s translation of Plotinus, dating from the second half of the fifteenth century, has been seen as a key source to the Neoplatonism informing Bruno’s philosophy. In The Concept of Contraction in Giordano Bruno’s Philosophy another Neoplatonic source is considered, namely the pseudo-Aristotelian Liber de Causis (Book of causes), which has not yet been examined in the context of Renaissance Neoplatonism. This work, probably written in Arabic in the ninth century, was translated into Latin in the twelfth century and remained well known to many late Medieval and Renaissance philosophers. Catana argues that this work may have prepared for Ficino’s translation of Plotinus, and that in some instances it provided a common source to Renaissance philosophers, Bruno and Nicholas of Cusa (1401-1464) being conspicuous examples discussed in this book.

More books from Taylor and Francis

Cover of the book Veteran MPs and Conservative Politics in the Aftermath of the Great War by Leo Catana
Cover of the book Authorship Contested by Leo Catana
Cover of the book The Trade Balance in Monetary General Equilibrium by Leo Catana
Cover of the book The Technology of Maya Civilization by Leo Catana
Cover of the book Media Freedom and Contempt of Court by Leo Catana
Cover of the book Beazley's Design and Detail of the Space between Buildings by Leo Catana
Cover of the book Islam, Nationalism and Communism in a Traditional Society by Leo Catana
Cover of the book Whiteness and Postcolonialism in the Nordic Region by Leo Catana
Cover of the book Among the Ibos of Nigeria 1912 by Leo Catana
Cover of the book Iranian Cinema in a Global Context by Leo Catana
Cover of the book Pre-Marital Counseling by Leo Catana
Cover of the book Spatial Planning, Urban Form and Sustainable Transport by Leo Catana
Cover of the book Franklin D. Roosevelt and the Transformation of the Supreme Court by Leo Catana
Cover of the book Organisational Identity and Self-Transformation by Leo Catana
Cover of the book Youth Culture and Sport by Leo Catana
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy