The Congressional Black Caucus, Minority Voting Rights, and the U.S. Supreme Court

Nonfiction, Social & Cultural Studies, Social Science, Cultural Studies, African-American Studies, Political Science, Government
Cover of the book The Congressional Black Caucus, Minority Voting Rights, and the U.S. Supreme Court by Christina Rivers, University of Michigan Press
View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart
Author: Christina Rivers ISBN: 9780472028214
Publisher: University of Michigan Press Publication: July 17, 2012
Imprint: University of Michigan Press Language: English
Author: Christina Rivers
ISBN: 9780472028214
Publisher: University of Michigan Press
Publication: July 17, 2012
Imprint: University of Michigan Press
Language: English

Both the U.S. Supreme Court and the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) claim to advocate minority political interests, yet they disagree over the intent and scope of the Voting Rights Act (VRA), as well as the interpretation of the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. Whereas the Court promotes color-blind policies, the CBC advocates race-based remedies. Setting this debate in the context of the history of black political thought, Rivers examines a series of high-profile districting cases, from Rodgers v. Lodge (1982) through NAMUDNO v. Holder (2009). She evaluates the competing approaches to racial equality and concludes, surprisingly, that an originalist, race-conscious interpretation of the 14th Amendment, along with a revised states' rights position regarding electoral districting, may better serve minority political interests.

View on Amazon View on AbeBooks View on Kobo View on B.Depository View on eBay View on Walmart

Both the U.S. Supreme Court and the Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) claim to advocate minority political interests, yet they disagree over the intent and scope of the Voting Rights Act (VRA), as well as the interpretation of the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. Whereas the Court promotes color-blind policies, the CBC advocates race-based remedies. Setting this debate in the context of the history of black political thought, Rivers examines a series of high-profile districting cases, from Rodgers v. Lodge (1982) through NAMUDNO v. Holder (2009). She evaluates the competing approaches to racial equality and concludes, surprisingly, that an originalist, race-conscious interpretation of the 14th Amendment, along with a revised states' rights position regarding electoral districting, may better serve minority political interests.

More books from University of Michigan Press

Cover of the book Democracy and Institutions by Christina Rivers
Cover of the book Life and Thought in the Ancient Near East by Christina Rivers
Cover of the book Rethinking Sustainability by Christina Rivers
Cover of the book The Skin of Meaning by Christina Rivers
Cover of the book Arguments with Silence by Christina Rivers
Cover of the book Regulatory Barriers and the Principle of Non-discrimination in World Trade Law by Christina Rivers
Cover of the book The Next Twenty-five Years by Christina Rivers
Cover of the book The Stuff of Fiction by Christina Rivers
Cover of the book Growth, Trade, and Systemic Leadership by Christina Rivers
Cover of the book Reinventing the State by Christina Rivers
Cover of the book Slayers and Their Vampires by Christina Rivers
Cover of the book Textual Awareness by Christina Rivers
Cover of the book Democracy's Promise by Christina Rivers
Cover of the book Disabled Veterans in History by Christina Rivers
Cover of the book Paradigms and Sand Castles by Christina Rivers
We use our own "cookies" and third party cookies to improve services and to see statistical information. By using this website, you agree to our Privacy Policy