The Conservative Revolution of Antonin Scalia
Nonfiction, Reference & Language, Law, Constitutional, Social & Cultural Studies, Political Science, Government, History, Americas, United States
| Author: | Howard Schweber, David A Schultz, Henry L. Chambers Jr., Mary Welek Atwell, Christopher E. Smith, Charles F. Jacobs, Maureen Stobb, Jesse Merriam, Stephen M. Feldman, Ronald Kahn, Gerard Michael D’Emilio, Tim Johnson, Ryan Black, Ryan J. Owens, Christopher J. Krewson, Alexander Denison, Justin Wedeking, James Staab | ISBN: | 9781498564496 |
| Publisher: | Lexington Books | Publication: | August 31, 2018 |
| Imprint: | Lexington Books | Language: | English |
| Author: | Howard Schweber, David A Schultz, Henry L. Chambers Jr., Mary Welek Atwell, Christopher E. Smith, Charles F. Jacobs, Maureen Stobb, Jesse Merriam, Stephen M. Feldman, Ronald Kahn, Gerard Michael D’Emilio, Tim Johnson, Ryan Black, Ryan J. Owens, Christopher J. Krewson, Alexander Denison, Justin Wedeking, James Staab |
| ISBN: | 9781498564496 |
| Publisher: | Lexington Books |
| Publication: | August 31, 2018 |
| Imprint: | Lexington Books |
| Language: | English |
Many hoped or feared that Antonin Scalia’s appointment to the Supreme Court in 1986 would guarantee a conservative counter-revolution that would reverse the liberal jurisprudence of the Supreme Court under Chief Justice Earl Warren and which was continued to some extent under the Burger Court though the influence of Justice William Brennan. In addition, President Reagan described Scalia’s nomination as part of a project to remake the role of the Court, promote an interpretive approach of originalism, and shift authority and discretion to the States. Yet by the time of his death in 2016 it was unclear to what extent Scalia had effected the legal, institutional, or political revolutions that had been anticipated. While the Court did move to the right doctrinally, and reversed or modified many Vinson-Warren-Burger precedents, Scalia’s influence on constitutional jurisprudence turned out to be far less than it could have been, and his ability to persuade other Justices to adopt his legal views—both substantively and methodologically—was less than many mainstream media accounts recognize. Scalia’s institutional and political legacies are similarly complex: he was neither as transformative a figure as some of his allies might have hoped nor so unimportant as some of his detractors might have wished. The fact that his death and the controversy surrounding his replacement is so intense speaks to the fragile legacy that Scalia really has had on the Supreme Court after 30 years. This book will assess Scalia’s legacy in an edited volume that assembles leading legal and political science scholars who will evaluate his impact across a range of jurisprudential, institutional, and political issues.
Many hoped or feared that Antonin Scalia’s appointment to the Supreme Court in 1986 would guarantee a conservative counter-revolution that would reverse the liberal jurisprudence of the Supreme Court under Chief Justice Earl Warren and which was continued to some extent under the Burger Court though the influence of Justice William Brennan. In addition, President Reagan described Scalia’s nomination as part of a project to remake the role of the Court, promote an interpretive approach of originalism, and shift authority and discretion to the States. Yet by the time of his death in 2016 it was unclear to what extent Scalia had effected the legal, institutional, or political revolutions that had been anticipated. While the Court did move to the right doctrinally, and reversed or modified many Vinson-Warren-Burger precedents, Scalia’s influence on constitutional jurisprudence turned out to be far less than it could have been, and his ability to persuade other Justices to adopt his legal views—both substantively and methodologically—was less than many mainstream media accounts recognize. Scalia’s institutional and political legacies are similarly complex: he was neither as transformative a figure as some of his allies might have hoped nor so unimportant as some of his detractors might have wished. The fact that his death and the controversy surrounding his replacement is so intense speaks to the fragile legacy that Scalia really has had on the Supreme Court after 30 years. This book will assess Scalia’s legacy in an edited volume that assembles leading legal and political science scholars who will evaluate his impact across a range of jurisprudential, institutional, and political issues.
